The Study of Fiscal Instruments for Increasing Land Use in Thailand

Main Article Content

Angkana Thananupappun
Choompoonuh K.perpoomwiwat
Pan Ananapibut


This research is concerned with the study of fiscal instruments for increasing land use in Thailand. The aim of this study are to analyze land use in Thailand and evaluate the economic loss of vacant land. This research also reviews some of the fiscal instruments related to land taxation. Based on the GIS database in 2015, provided by the Land Development Department to analyze the land use, and characteristics by region and province. It was found that, over the last eight years, the rate of vacant land in Thailand has been in decline. The largest area of vacant land was in the north, while Ubonratchathani province used land the least. Most of the vacant land was agricultural , which included meadows, natural woods and low-land areas. When the vacant land was assessed in terms of economic loss, it was currently found that Thailand has inefficient land use for agricultural, commercial, industrial and residential areas. If these areas are used more effectively, it can increase the value of land use by 4.41 percent of the GDP, which presents the amount of opportunity cost from using land ineffectively about 640,440 million baht. Recently-used land taxation, e.g. local administration tax, still results in the concentration of land possession, which indicates the ineffectiveness of tax instrument. Therefore, the government should use other types of land taxes, such as wealth tax ,land and buildings taxes in order to decrease the rate of uncultivated or vacant land possession, The study, however, has proven that only wealth tax was significantly efficient to stimulate the use of this vacant land.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thananupappun, A., K.perpoomwiwat, C., & Ananapibut, P. (2019). The Study of Fiscal Instruments for Increasing Land Use in Thailand. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University, 14(1), 139-170. Retrieved from
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Angkana Thananupappun

Ph.D.Candidate (Economics), Faculty of Economics,Srinakharinwirot University. (2017).

Choompoonuh K.perpoomwiwat

Ph.D. (Economics) University of Utah. United States(2000), Currently a Associate Professor in Faculty
of Economics and Associate Dean for Research and International Relations, Graduate School of
Srinakharinwirot University.

Pan Ananapibut

Ph.D. (Economics) University of Sydney, Australia. (2008), Currently a Director of Tax Policy Revenue,
Fiscal Policy Office, Ministry of finance.


Adesoji, O.A., Yohannes, G.H. , & Ahadu, T.T. (2016). Evidence of land hoarding behavior in US agriculture. Retrieved July 30 ,2017, from

Ainembabazi, J.H. & Angelsen, A. (2016). Land Inheritance and Market Transactions in Uganda. Retrieved 30 July, 2017, from

Ananapibut, P. (2012). The reform of the tax system for thai society equal. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from (in Thai)

Fatta, G. (2014). The Effect of Land Speculation on the Housing in the City of Jeddah. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from;sequence=1

Felipe, M., Alexandra, P., & Miguel, V. (2008). Determinants of Urban Vacant Land Evidence form , Chile. Retrieved July 29, 2017, from

Fiscal Policy Office. (2016). Land and building tax rates. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from (in Thai)

French-property. (2015). French Wealth Tax. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from

Garner, O. & Gary, O. (2010). Approaches for Calculation of Holding Costs in the Context of Greenfield Residential Development. Retrieved July 29 ,2017, from

Government Housing Bank. (2016). Land evaluation in 2016-2019. Retrieved July 28, 2017, from (in Thai)

Groves (2009). The Impact of Positive Property Tax Differentials on the Timing of Development. Retrieved February 6,2016, from

Japanese Fixed Property Tax. (2003). Land and Property Taxation. Retrieved 29 March 3, 2015, from

Khuprakhon, K. (1999). Land economics. Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University Printing House. (in Thai)

Laovakul, D. (2012). Fiscal policy and measures for fairness in income distribution. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from (in Thai)

Land Development Department. (2015). Land use condition of 77 provinces in 2015 – 2009. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from (in Thai)

Land Development Department. (2017). Land use map of Thailand in 2015-2016. Retrieved July 28, 2017, from (in Thai)

Li, M., & Daowei, Z. (2011). Impacts of property tax on land use change decisions in Georgia.Urban. Retrieved 29 July 2017, from

Natalia, C. & Chris, E. (2013). Too rich to rein in. Retrieved July 29, 2017, from

Newman, G., Gu, D., Kim, J., Bowman, A.M. and Li, W. (2016). Elasticity and urban vacancy: A longitudinal comparison of U.S. cities.Retrieved February 3, 2016, from

Newman, G., Bowman, A.M., Lee, R. and Kim, B.(2016). A current inventory of vacant urban land in America. Retrieved April 4,2017, from

Newman, G., Park, Y., Bowman, A.M. and Lee, R. (2018). Vacant urban areas: Causes and interconnected factors .Retrieved March 30, 2017, from

Ngamarunchote, B., Rerkasupon, P., Borwornrongchai, T. and pongbangli, P. (2012). Concept of land and property tax : a case study of land and building tax. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from (in Thai)

ManasBoonpheampool, A., Charukratanapong, R., Auamjang, V. (2009). A study to review the land management tools thailand and overseas.Retrieved July 28, 2017, from (in Thai)

Meng, L. & Zhang, D. (2014). Impacts of property tax on land use change decisions in Georgia . Retrieved 15 July 2017, from

Morande, F., Petermann, A. & Vargas, M. (2010) .Determinants of Urban Vacant L and: Evidence from Santiago, Chile. Retrieved 15 March 2017, from

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2015). Report situational poverty and inequality in thailand in 2013. Retrieved July 28, 2017, from (in Thai)

Pascal, T. & Sebastian, W. (2014). Speculation and the U.S. Housing Boom. Retrieved 30 July 2017, from https://www.bundesbank.

Patmasiriwat, D. (2009). Distribution of wealth in Thailand Empirical research and policy to increase the power of the poor. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from (in Thai)

Permpoonwiwat, C.K. (2009). Study on land tax policy. Retrieved March 24, 2017, from (in Thai)

Phiphatserithum, K. (2009). Fiscal allocation and distribution. Bangkok: Thammasat University Printing House.(in Thai)

Pietola, K., Myyrd, S. & Pouta, E. (2009). The Effects of Changes in Capital Gains Taxes on Land Sales: Empirical Evidence from Finland. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from

Poolmak, P. (2014). Influence of land tax on fairness of income distribution:case study in sisaket province. Retrieved July 26, 2017, from (in Thai)

Puapanichya, C. (1992). Basic land economics. Bangkok: TP Printing CO., LTD.(in Thai) Real estate Information center. (2016). Draft of land and building tax. Retrieved July 28, 2017, from (in Thai)

Seung, G.K., Seong, H. & Roger, C. (2012). Exploring Spatially Heterogeneous Effect of a Property tax Scheme on Land Development. Retrieved 29 July, 2017, from

Thailand Development Research Institute Foundation. (2013). Policy studies poverty and income distribution. Retrieved July 22, 2015, from (in Thai)

Thammanoo, A. (2005). General knowledge of public finance. Bangkok: Thai Research and Training Co., Ltd.(in Thai)

Thedwanich, J., SriSaowarak, E., Nabangchang, O., Sajjanan, S. and Permpoonwiwat, C.K. (2009). Assessment new land and building tax impact on land use. Retrieved March 23, 2017, from (in Thai)

Towbina and Weberb (2014) .Speculation and the U.S. Housing Boom. Retrieved June 2, 2016, from https://www.bundesbank/.

Wongharnchao,W., Nabangchang, O., SriSaowarak, E., SimaPichaichet, P. Pinitphowadol, S. and Thedwanich, J. (2001). Study land holding and economic and legal implications for maximizing land use. Retrieved June 2, 2016, from (in Thai)

Yasith, P. (2015). Land and building taxation. Retrieved November 24, 2015, from (in Thai)