Stakeholder Analysis of the Autonomous University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article employs stakeholder salience to analyze stakeholder of soon-to-be autonomous universities by stakeholders’ attributes which are power, legitimacy and urgency. These stakeholders are students, academic staff, administrative staff, the governing board of the university, the university council, sources of fund, employers and external organizations (Office of the higher education Commission, the Bureau of the budget, Office of the Auditor General of Thailand, the Comptroller General’s Department). The article explains that the definitive stakeholders of the future-autonomous university are students, academic staff, administrative staff, the governing board of the university and the university council, which are all the internal stakeholders. To become the autonomous university, the university needs to address the urgency of these stakeholders which are, for example, an increase in the study fee, a decrease in the teaching quality, a lack of job security and insufficient welfare, the future income of the university, the new rules, regulations and organizing system of the university and the university governance.
Downloads
Article Details
All articles published in the Journal of Management Science, Ubon Ratchathani University are copyrighted by the journal. The views and opinions expressed in each article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Faculty of Management Science, Ubon Ratchathani University. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles.
References
เทียนฉาย กีระนันท์. (2545). รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์โครงการวิจัยเรื่องการเตรียมพร้อมของมหาวิทยาลัยของรัฐเพื่อเป็นมหาวิทยาลัยในกำกับรัฐ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักปลัดทบวงมหาวิทยาลัย.
บุญเจริญ ศิริเนาวกุล. (ม.ป.ป.). มองมหาวิทยาลัยในกำกับจากข้อเท็จจริง. Unpublished manuscript.
มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎนครปฐม. (2558). การศึกษาข้อมูลข้อดีข้อเสียของการเป็นมหาวิทยาลัยในกำกับของรัฐ. นครปฐม: มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎนครปฐม.
มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์. มปป. พบอธิการบดี ฉบับที่ 3/2556 "ม.อ.กับการเป็นมหาวิทยาลัยในกำกับของรัฐ"
พบอธิการบดี ฉบับที่ 3. Retrieved 10 มกราคม, 2561, from http://www.psu.ac.th/th/node/5129
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). “ประสิทธิภาพและการบริหารจัดการ ของมหาวิทยาลัยในกำกับของรัฐ. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
Aligica, P. D. (2006). Institutional and stakeholder mapping : Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review, 6(1), 79-90.
AVCI, Ö., RING, E., & MITCHELLI, L. (2015). Stakeholders in U.S. higher education: An analysis through two theories of stakeholders. Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Yönetimi Dergisi, X
Balbachevsky, E. (unknown). Brazilian higher education policy: Internal and external stakeholders. Unpublished manuscript.
Benneworth, P. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education may 2010, Volume 59, Issue 5, Pp 567–588 | Cite as, 59(5), 567-588.
Bjørkquist, C. (2009). Stakeholder influence in higher education - old ideas in new bottles? (Master, Karlstad University Studies).
Bui, V. Q. (2017). Stakeholder identification in Vietnamese private higher education institutions. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 57-62.
Chapleo, C., & Simms, C. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education, perspectives: Policy and practice in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(1), 12-20.
El-Morshedy, R. M., Mazen, S. A., Hassanein, E., Fahmy, A. A., & Hassanein, M. K. (2015). Stakeholders of Egypt public universities and research institutions: An information technology governance perspective. Egyptian Computer Science Journal, 39(1), 70-86.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing.
Grimble, R., & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55(2), 173-193.
Honalde, G., & Cooper, L. (1989). Beyond coordination and control: An interorganizational approach to structural adjustment, service delivery, and natural resource management. World Development, 17(10), 1531-1541.
Jorge, M. L., Hernández, A. L., & Cejas, M. Y. C. (2012). Stakeholder expectations in Spanish public universities: An empirical study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(10), 1-13.
Kettunen, J. (2014). The stakeholder map in higher education. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 78(7), 34-38.
Kreitner, R. (2009). Principles of management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Labanauskis, R. & Ginevičius, R. (2017). Role of stakeholders leading to development of higher education services. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 9(3), 63-75.
Leisyte, L., Westerheijden, D. F., Epping, E., Faber, M., & de Weert, E. (2013). Stakeholders and quality assurance in higher education. 26th Annual CHER Conference, Lausanne.
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2010). An exploratory research on the stakeholders of a university. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1(1), 76-88.
Marić, I. (2013). Stakeholder analysis of higher education institutions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 11(2), 217-226.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Slabá, M. (2015). Stakeholder groups of public and private universities in the czech republic - identification, categorization and prioritization. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 305-326.
Zaman, K. (2015). Quality guidelines for good governance in higher education across the globe doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.01.001
