Carbon Footprint Assessment of the Distribution Process and Methods for Greenhouse Gas Reduction: The Case of Beverage Production Business
Main Article Content
Abstract
Climate change has led the transportation sector to be recognized as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. This study aims to quantify greenhouse gas emissions arising from the distribution processes of a case-study company and to identify appropriate measures for reducing emissions associated with distribution activities. Greenhouse gas emissions were assessed in accordance with the Global Logistics Emissions Council (GLEC) Framework, an internationally recognized carbon footprint assessment tool specifically designed for transportation and logistics supply chains. Data were collected through on-site observation of actual operations, semi-structured interviews, and documentary review. The collected data were subsequently analyzed to estimate greenhouse gas emissions and to compare emission outcomes under different emission-reduction policy scenarios. The results indicate that the case-study company generated a total of 105,693.65 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO₂e) from its distribution processes. Direct-to-store distribution accounted for 86,974.52 kgCO₂e, while direct transportation via a distribution center resulted in emissions of 18,719.13 kgCO₂e. The most effective and operationally feasible emission-reduction strategy for the beverage manufacturing company was found to be the improvement of transportation efficiency through load factor optimization combined with the adoption of electric vehicles. This policy achieved a total emission reduction of 19,017.93 kgCO₂e, representing a 21.94 percent decrease compared with greenhouse gas emissions prior to process improvement.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are SJMS’s copyright. The editorial board allows all published articles to be copied, excerpted, or disseminated with academic citation.
References
Albrechtowics, P. (2023). Electric vehicle impact on the environment in terms of the electric energy source - case study. Energy Reports, 9(2023), 3812-3821.
Chanchaichujit, J., Balasubramanian, S., Wong, W., & Jomthanachai, S. (2025). The development of GHG emissions calculation platform for postal supply chain. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 2186-2195.
Department of Climate Change and Environment. (2025). Greenhouse gas emissions data national level. Retrieved October 3, 2025 from https://ghgplatformdemo.dcce.go.th/th/national
Doolgindachbaporn, T., Neeratanaphan, L., & Waralakprapat, N. (2014). Carbon footprint of Thai white spirit factory. Chulachomklao Royal Academy Journal, 12(1), 45-58.
Kanchanakarankul, D., & Tia, W. (2017). Analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of parcel post in the metropolitan area. Engineering Journal Chiang Mai University, 24(3), 98-111.
Luengyuang, N. (2022). Corporate carbon footprint assessment: a case study of beverage manufacturing factory [Master Independent Study, Mahasarakam University].
Maimun, T., Teekasap, S., Sareephattananon, A., & Rattanatai, B. (2018). Organization carbon footprint assessment of Eastern Asia university. Eau Heritage Journal Science and Technology, 12(2), 195-209.
Meesuk, S., & Wattana, S. (2022). An assessment of carbon footprint of beer products. The paper presented at the 23rd National Graduate Research Conference, Khon Kaen.
PTTEP. (2022). Carbon capture and storage. Retrieved October 3, 2025 from https://www.pttep.com/th/our-company/ep-net-zero-2050/carbon-capture-and-storage
Saengsathien, A., & Namchimplee, K. (2022). Green point-to-point logistics at Kalasin: a case study of rice transportation. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 49(6), 772-779.
SIMTEC Institute. (2024). The future of renewable energy use in modern factory production. Retrieved October 3, 2025 from https://www.simtec.or.th/blog/the-future-of-using-renewable-energy-modern-factory-production/
Smart Fright Centre. (2025). Global Logistics Emissions Council Framework. Retrieved October 3, 2025 from https://smart-freight-centre-media.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/GLEC_FRAMEWORK_v3.2_21_10_25_1.pdf
Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization. (2025). Carbon footprint product. Retrieved October 3, 20253 from https://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=Y0hKdlpIVmpkSE5mYVhNPQ
Thaipradith, P., Tuprakay, S., Ratcha, M., & Suwannahong, K. (2023). Assessing the carbon footprint of a product: a case study of the wooden chair production process. Journal of Health and Environmental Education, 8(3), 178-186.
United Nations Climate Change. (2016). The Paris agreement. Retrieved October 3, 2025, from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement