THE EVALUATION OF THE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT PROJECT OF STUDENT CARE AND SUPPORT SYSTEM IN BANMIWITTAYA SCHOOL, LOPBURI PROVINCE
Keywords:
The Evaluation, Classroom Management;, Student Care and Support SystemAbstract
The purposes of this study were to assess the context evaluation, input factors evaluation, process evaluation, product evaluation, impact evaluation, effectiveness evaluation, sustainability evaluation, and transportability evaluation. The CIPPIEST was utilized as the evaluation tool for this project. The sample group included 306 students, 306 parents, and 65 teachers of Banmiwittaya School, Lopburi Province during the 2020 fiscal year. The sample size was determined using the Krejcie and Morgan tables, and stratified random sampling was employed for sample selection. Additionally, data were collected from one teacher responsible for the school budget and forty-three advisors. In total, fourteen copies of research instruments were used in this study. The data were analyzed in terms of percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
The results of the study were as follows:
The overall evaluation of the classroom management project of student care and support system in Banmiwittaya School, Lopburi Province revealed that it passed all assessment criteria for eight issues and twenty-four indicators as follows: 1) Context evaluation met all two indicators’ criteria at the high level. 2) Input factors evaluation met all two indicator criteria, with one at the high level and another at the highest level. 3) Process evaluation met all two indicators criteria at the highest level. 4) Outcome evaluation met all four indicators criteria at the highest level. 5) Impact evaluation met all four indicators’ criteria at the highest level. 6) The effectiveness evaluation percentage met all four indicators’ criteria at the highest level.7) The sustainability evaluation percentage met all three indicators’ criteria at the highest level. 8) The transportability evaluation percentage met all three indicators’ criteria, with two at the high level and another at the highest level.
References
Srimahawaro, K. (2013).Assessment of the Family Joining in Philosophy Project of Sufficiency Economy at Ban Sra Bua School. Nakbutr Review Journal Nakhon Si Tham Rajabhat University. Year 6 (2). July - December 2014,
Kueanun, N. (2010). Implementation of the student care and support system of educational institutions that affect the quality of life of students under Prachuap Khiri Khan Educational Service Area Office 1. Master of Education Thesis Branch of Educational Administration. Phetchaburi : Phetchaburi Rajabhat University,
Kaewmanee N. (2013).Assessment of the student support system project. Thesaban School 3 (Wat Sala Hua Yang), Songkhla Municipality Songkhla Province Songkhla: Thesaban School 3,
Tangkunanan, P. (2020).Classroom management and learning resources. Bangkok: Min Service Supply, 2015. Pakin Chaiwong. Assessment Report of Morality and Ethics Promotion Project in Pa Kang Wittaya School. According to the way of the Buddhist school with the activity "PAKANG Model". Uttaradit : Pakang Witthaya School Uttaradit Educational Service Area Office, Area 2,
Inkong, M. (2008). Assessment of the Educational Quality Development and Upgrading Process Project in Small Schools Under the Surat Thani Educational Service Area Office 2. Master of Education Thesis. Field of study: Educational Administration. Surat Thani : Graduate School Suratthani Rajabhat University,
Nilphan, M. (2010).Evaluation of decision-making curriculum using a systematic approach using the CIPP Model. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University,
Sangnikul R. (2016). Evaluation of the Thailand Little Scientists House Project: A Case Study of Kalasin Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Master of Education Thesis. Department of Education Research and Evaluation. Mahasarakham : Graduate School Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University,
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008).Strengthening the student support system Student Training Handbook: Fellow Counselor (YC – Youth Counseler) for guest speakers. Bangkok : Freight and Parcel Organization,
Krejcie, R.V. (1970). and Morgan, D.W.. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.Educational and psychological measurement, 30 (3) : 607-610,
Stufflebeam, D.L.. (2007).Evaluation theory, Models and Applications. San Francisco. CA : Jossey-Bass,
Stufflebeam, D. L., and Coryn, C. L. S.. (2014). Evaluation: Theory models and applications. (2nd eds.). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of MCU Buddhapanya Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.