The Development of Physics Teacher’s Indicators For the 21st Centuries in the Northeastern of Thailand
Keywords:
Develop Indicators, Physics Teacher’s Attributes, 21st CenturyAbstract
The purposes of this research were to: 1) to develop indicators of Physics teacher’s attributes for the 21st centuries in the Northeastern of Thailand 2) to analyze the model of indicators of Physics teacher’s attributes for the 21st centuries in the Northeastern of Thailand. The samples were divided into 2 groups: group 1 is 697 Physics teachers in Exploratory Factor Analysis: EFA and 635 Physics teachers in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: CFA by using Multistage Random Sampling technique. The instrument used were the structure interview, and indicators of Physics teacher’s attributes model in the 21st centuries. The Index consistency between questions of definition, terminology (IOC) is .60 to 1.00, the discriminative power is 0.271 to 0.762, and the reliability is 0.90 to 0.97. For Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using a computer program. The results if the research were as follow:
- The analysis of the model of indicators of Physics teacher’s attributes for the 21st centuries in the Northeastern of Thailand found that it consists of 4 components, 31 indicators, and the component is between .564 to .789 consisting of knowledge and skills learning management self-development and ethics for teachers. All components can explain the attributes of physics teachers according to the guidelines for life skills in the 21st century, 64.802 percent.
- The analysis of the model of indicators of Physics teacher’s attributes for the 21st centuries in the Northeastern of Thailand found that it consists of 4 components, 31 indicators, with values ranging from 0.807 to 0.933 with a statistical significance level. 01. There are self-development, learning management, moral code, and ethics for teachers, knowledge and skills. The factor loading of 0.933, 0.923, 0.879, and 0.807.
References
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D.J. & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Nakin, S. (2012). A Study of Group Working Behavior Achievement of Students Year 2 Faculty of Education, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University by Cooperative Learning. Nakhon Ratchasima: Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University.
Naowarangsi, N., Soinam, S. & Homsin, N. (2019).The Development of Teacher Leadership Indicators for Secondary School teachers in the 2st Century under the Office of the Basic Education Commission in Northeast Region. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal, 14(1), 65-78.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2015). Learning Science in the 21St Century. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Panthong, W. (2013). A Model for the Development of Student Oriented Teachers in the School under Jurisdiction of Primary Education Service Areas. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 15(sp), 193-205.
Phrasamu Narit Narinto. (2019). Teacher Development for Quality of Learners in the 21St Century. Journal of Graduate MCU khonkaen Campus, 6(3), 459-473.
Sungsimma, P. & Somprach, K. (2016). Teacher Quality Factors Affecting the Desirable Characteristics of Students in the 21th Century. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University (Graduate Studies Research), 10(3), 103-109.
Suttiwan, S. & Phusee-orn, S. (2018). Development indicator features elementary science teacher in 21st century schools under the Primary Education Service Area Office, Udon Thani. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 24(1), 330-345.
Thanaphatchottiwat, S. et al. (2018). The Development of Teaching Professional Experience Model for Enhancing the Required Characteristics of Teacher in the 21st Century. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 17(1), 33-48.
