Conceptual Framework and Taxonomy of Innovation: A Case Study of Malaysia and Thailand Public Sector

Main Article Content

Thuanthong Krutchon
Samihah Khalil @Halim

Abstract

This paper has two purposes. First, it aims to critically review the conceptual framework of innovation. Scholars view the term innovation with different meanings and this paper discusses several significant concepts of innovation.  In doing so, three major taxonomies of innovation will be given focus: product and service, service delivery, and organization innovation. Second, this paper discusses the significance and best practice of innovation taxonomy in both private and public sectors. Two case studies are reviewed to illustrate innovation initiatives in the public sector which have taken place in Malaysia and Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Krutchon, T., & Khalil @Halim, S. (2018). Conceptual Framework and Taxonomy of Innovation: A Case Study of Malaysia and Thailand Public Sector. Journal of International Studies, Prince of Songkla University, 5(2), 1–21. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jis/article/view/116146
Section
Academic Articles

References

Adams, D. (2010). Operationalising place-based innovation in public administration. Journal of Place Management and Development, 3(1),8-21.

Alberti, A., &Bertucci, G. (2006). Replicating Innovations in Governance. In G. Bertucci (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.

Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., &Entwistle, T. (2010). Public Service Improvement. New York: Oxford University Press.

Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.

Brooke, R. (1989). Managing the Enabling Authority London: Longman.Conger, S. (2009).Social Invention.The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 14(1-225).

Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.

Brooke, R. (1989). Managing the Enabling Authority London: Longman.

Conger, S. (2009).Social Invention.The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 14(1-225).

Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2550 (2007).

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495-522.

Decentralization Plan and Process Formulation Act, B.E. 2542. (1999).

FIMM, J. M. (2000). Innovation Strategies in Australian Local Government. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

Greene, M. (2003).Investing for Innovation.Work Study, 52(2), 84-88.

Hampton, W. (1987). Local Government and Urban Politics. London: Longman.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Service: Past and Present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27-34.

Ho, L.-A. (2011). Meditation, learning, organizational innovation and performance.Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(1), 113-131.

Hunmin, K. (2006). Approaches and Means of Innovation in Korean Local Government.The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 11(2), 1-16.

Jones, G. (1997). The New Local Government Agenda. Hertfordshire: The Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators.

Krueathep, W. (2005).Creative Innovation of Local Government. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund.

Lewis, W. A. (1966). Development planning: the essentials of economic policy. London: Allen &Unwin.

Light, P. C. (1998).Sustaining Innovation. California: Jossey-Bass.

Liu, Z. (2008). Welcome Remarks on behalf of the World Bank. In Okpol& P. Atchariyapanya (Eds.), Dialogue on Implementing the Local Government Provisions of the New Constitution in Thailand.Nonthaburi: College of Local Government Development, King Prajadhipok's Institute.

Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008).Innovations in Governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3-20.

Ng, S., Russell-Bennett, R., & Dagger, T. (2007). A typology of mass services: the role of service delivery and consumption purpose in classifying service experiences. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(7), 471–480.

Noor, M. N. M., & Pitt, M. (2009).A critical review on innovation in facilities management service delivery.Facilities, 27(5/6), 0263-2772.

Oke, A. (2007). Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies.International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(6), 564-587.

Patel, I. (2006). Understanding Innovations and Best Practices. In G. Bertucci (Ed.), Innovations in Governance and Public Administration: Replicating What Works. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.

Potts, J., &Kastelle, T. (2010). Public Sector Innovation Research: What's next? Innovation: management, policy & practice, 12(2), 122-137.

Puangngam, K. (2009). Thai Local Government (7 ed.). Bangkok: Winyuchon.

Puangngam, K. (2010). Synthesis and Lesson Imitate of Local Innovation and Public Service of Local overnment. Bangkok: Office of Prime Minister.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Ruiz, J. A. G. (2009). Public-private partnership to develop infrastructure and encourage innovation in Mexico. Business Strategy Series, 10(4), 229-234.

Setabutr, N., Lertpaithoon, S., Suwanmala, C., Rathamarit, N., Suvanamongkol, P., Vajirakachorn, S., Nagai, F. (2002).Thailand Japan Joint Research Project on Capacity Building of Thai Local Authorities. Bangkok: Ministry of Interior.

Stewart, J., & Clarke, M. (2011). The Public Service Orientation: Issues and Dilemmas. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Public Administration: 25 Years of Analysis and Debate.West Sussex: Wiley-Black Well.

Suwanmala, C., Krueathep, W., Sutthicharee, C., Patthamasiriwat, D., Srichan, T., Sriwirot, Y., . . .Chitchang, S. (2004). Nomenclature Dictionary of Thai Local Innovation Annual Year B.E. 2547.Bangkok: Kurasapa.

Suwanmala, C., Krueathep, W., Sutthicharee, C., Patthamasiriwat, D., Srichan, T., Sriwirot, Y., . . .Chitchang, S. (2006). Policy Issues to Encourage Innovation in Thailand. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund.

Tanchai, W. (2008).Directions of Local Government under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2550 (2007). In O. Kokpol& P. Atchariyapanya (Eds.), Dialogue on Implementing the Local Government Provisions of the New Constitution in Thailand.Nonthaburi: College of Local Government Development, King Prajadhipok's Institute.

Thavesetra, V., &Nuansakul, S. (1999).Thai Government and Politics.Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University Press.

United Nations. (2011). Good Practices and Innovaiton in Public Governance. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Vejjajiva, A. (2010). The Speech of AbhisitVejjajiva, Prime Minister in 1st Thai Local Innovation Award. Bangkok: Thai Royal Government Retrieved from ttp://www.eppo.go.th/admin/cab/sp-2553-09-17.html.

Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., Schwabsky, N., &Ruvio, A. (2008). Public Sector Innovation for Europe: A multinational Eight- Country Exploration of Cititzens' Perspectives. Public Adminis tration, 86(2), 307-329.

Walker, R. (2010). Innovation. In R. Ashworth, G. Boyne & T. Entwistle (Eds.), Public Service Improvement: Theories and Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wettenhall, R. (1988). Local Government as Innovators.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 47(4), 351-374.

Wilson, D., & Game, C. (1998).Local Government in the United Kingdom. London: Macmillan Press.

Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. In P. Windrum& P. Koch (Eds.), Innovation in Public Sector Services (pp. 8). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.