Linguistic Landscape of the Chanthaboon Riverfront Community: Language Use and Language Choice on Shop Signs

ผู้แต่ง

  • Kanpicha Boonmak Department of English, Faculty of Social Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Chanthaburi Campus
  • Sattawat Chaiyasit Department of English for Business Communication, Faculty of Science and Arts, Burapha University, Chanthaburi Campus
  • Praweenuch Sotkomkham Department of English for International Communication, Faculty of Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jhusoc.2026.17

คำสำคัญ:

linguistic landscape, heritage tourism, shop signs, language choice, Chanthaboon Riverfront Community

บทคัดย่อ

This study examines the linguistic landscape of the Chanthaboon Riverfront Community in Chanthaburi Province, Thailand. Using a mixed-methods design, the study analyzed 71 shop signs and conducted semi-structured interviews with seven local shop owners. The sign analysis revealed that monolingual signs were the most common type, accounting for 74.6% of the dataset. Monolingual Thai signs formed the largest group at 56.3%, followed by Thai-English bilingual signs at 21.1%. Thai-Chinese signs were rare, making up only 2.8% of the sample, and only one Thai-Chinese-English trilingual sign was found. In terms of visual prominence, the Thai language was usually displayed more prominently than English on bilingual signs. Interview data suggested that shop owners’ language choices were shaped by both practical and symbolic concerns. The Thai language was associated with local identity, family memory, and the heritage atmosphere of the community. English was used to support tourist accessibility, online searchability, and business image. Chinese appeared mainly as a marker of cultural heritage rather than as an everyday language of commercial communication. The findings suggest that the linguistic landscape of the Chanthaboon Riverfront Community remains strongly anchored in Thai, while English and Chinese are used in relation to tourism, branding, and heritage identity.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Backhaus, P. (2006). Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27195495

Gorter, D. (2006). Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668382

Kim, T. S., & Ahn, J. S. (2023). Celebrating local heritage while marginalizing local language: the multilingual linguistic landscapes of Seongsu-dong in Seoul. International Journal of Multilingualism, 22(2), 517-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2260423

Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002

Low, P. (2022). The linguistic landscape and prospects of a seaside destination in the east of Thailand. Journal of Language and Teaching Research, 13(5), 965-973. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.08

Lu, S., Li, G., & Xu, M. (2020). The linguistic landscape in rural destinations: A case study of Hongcun Village in China. Tourism Management, 77, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104005

Mansoor, S. S., Hamzah, N. H., & Shangeetha, R. K. (2023). Linguistic landscape in Malaysia: The case of language choice used in signboards. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 1062-1083. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28338

Pathanasin, S. (2025). A Study of the Linguistic Landscape on Phuket Island: Identity, Tourism and Policy. rEFLections, 32(1), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.279617

Phra Khru Samuchinwarawat Thiraphattho (Junjuea), & Phakdeesaen, S. (2022). Coexistence in new normal society of multicultural community along Chanthaboon Riverbank, Muang District, Chanthaburi Province. MCU Ubonratchathani Journal of Buddhist Studies, 7(1), 401-416.

Rungswang, A. (2023). Linguistic Landscape: Forms and Functions of Signs on Khaosan Road, Thailand. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 8(10), 399-415. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/262989

Sangprachan, S., Atthaisong, J., & Phaluehaspailin, Y. (2026). Analysis of tourists' demographic characteristics and tourism behavior in the Chanthaboon waterfront community, Chanthaburi Province. Academic Journal of Phetchaburi Rajabhat University, 16(1), 78-87. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ajpbru/article/view/300322

Sari, D. F., Yusuf, Y. Q., Putri, V. N., Usman, H., & Qismullah, F. I. (2024). Shop names and language culture: A study of linguistic landscape in Aceh's Tourist Hub. International Journal of Language Studies, 18(3), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1260441

Savski, K. (2021). Language policy and linguistic landscape: Identity and struggle in two southern Thai spaces. Linguistic Landscape, 7(2), 128-150. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.20008.sav

Shen, Y. (2022). Exploring the linguistic landscape of a historical and cultural city in China: From the perspective of language ecology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2172-2181. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.25

Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (Eds.). (2009). Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. Routledge.

Vivas-Peraza, A. C. (2020). English in the linguistic landscape of Thailand: A case study of public signs in Hat Yai. Language Value, 13(1), 23-57. https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2020.13.2

Wang, X., & Gao, Y. (2025). The role of English in the linguistic landscape of Luang Prabang: Perceptions from merchants and consumers. English Today, 41(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078424000476

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

19-08-2026

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Boonmak, K., Chaiyasit, S., & Sotkomkham, P. (2026). Linguistic Landscape of the Chanthaboon Riverfront Community: Language Use and Language Choice on Shop Signs. มนุษยสังคมสาร (มสส.) คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบุรีรัมย์, 24(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.14456/jhusoc.2026.17

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิจัย