Development of Parallel Tests for Thai Language General Ability for Teacher Students in Public University

Main Article Content

ปรัชญา ใจภักดี

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop 3 parallel tests and establish the norms for interpreting the scores from Thai language ability test of student teachers in public universities. The sample group in this study consisted of 1,110 fourth-year student teachers in public universities in the academic year of 2018. They were selected by multi-stage sampling. The results of the research found that the 3 parallel tests, each one consisted of 20 items were of high quality in terms of content validity. Each item had IOC of 1.00. The difficulty level of the first, the second, and the third test were 0.68, 0.67, and 0.67, respectively. The means of discrimination were 0.64, 0.65, and 0.64, and the reliability of the tests were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.88, respectively.  The correlation coefficient between Test 1 and Test 2, Test 1 and Test 3, and Test 2 and Test 3 were 0.88, 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. This showed that the 3 tests were parallel to one another.  The norm was shown in the form of normal scores ranging from 26 to 69.

Article Details

How to Cite
ใจภักดี ป. (2020). Development of Parallel Tests for Thai Language General Ability for Teacher Students in Public University. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (JHUSOC), 18(3), 155–173. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhusoc/article/view/244038
Section
Research Article

References

Al Aufi, M. A. (2014). Implications of the improvement of teaching quality for professional development (PD) of academics at the colleges of applied sciences (CASs) in the sultanate of Oman. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). The University of Waikato NewZealand.

Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

Anastasi, A. (1968). Psychological testing (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.

Ferguson, G. A. (1966). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Frankel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1999). How to design and evaluate research in education (4thed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

Gourneau, B. (2005). “Five attitudes of effective teachers: Implications for training”. Essays in Education, 13, p. 1-8.

Gronlund, N. E. (1981). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan.

Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

Kanjanawat, S. (2013). Classical test theory (7th ed). Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Kermel, Louis J. & Marylin O. Kermel. (1978). Measurement and evaluation in the school. New York: McMillman Publishing.

Liukkonen, J. & Esko, L. (1999, August). The reliability and validity of scores from the children’s version of the perception of success questionnaire. Education and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), 651-664.

Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. California: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Laothong, N. (2016). Developing educational research tools measurement. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Macmillan, T. T. (1971, May). The Delphi technique. In Paper presented at the meeting of the California Junior Colleges Associations Committee on Research and development. n.p.

Mehren, W. A. & Lehmann, I. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Rinehart and Winston.

Pongboriboon, Y. (1979). Principles of evaluation and evaluation of education. Khon Kaen: Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Prayurnprohm, P. (2008). The development of Thai teacher professional aptitude test. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Panich, V. (2012). Skills in the new future: Education for the 21st century. Bangkok: Tathata publication. [in Thai]

________. Way of learning for students in the 21st century. Bangkok: Sodsri-Saritwongse Foundation. [in Thai]

Ryan, L. V. & Riordan, C. M. (2000). The development of a measure of desired moral approbation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(3), 448-462.

Saiyos, L. & Saiyos, A. (2010). Educational research technique (11th ed.). Bangkok: Suwiriyasarn. [in Thai]

________. Techniques for measuring learning (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Children's Club. [in Thai]

Taweerat, T. (2000). Creation and development of achievement test (7th ed.). Bangkok: Educational and Psychological Test Bureau Srinakharinwirot University. [in Thai]

Tirakanan, S. (2010). Research methods in social science: A guide to practice. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]