Social Immunity in Phubbing Society

Main Article Content

ดร.เอนก สุวรรณณฑิต

Abstract

The objective of the research was to study the philosophy of interdisciplinary knowledge
on deep listening techniques as a social immunity through the philosophical analysis with the
philosophical paradigm of thought, philosophy of technology and social philosophy. The results
were: 1) the social problems of phubbing society are existed. Modern communication devices have
drawn attention from human which cause no one concern each other and new generations lose their
social skills, "Face to face" and more likely to have the less mental ability and a shorter attention.
The usageof communication devices at all times was making external recognition failed. Men could
not filter out irrelevant stimuli. The issue of a shorter attention span will affect the education and
lifelong learning in the next-generations. And 2) Deep listening is the immunity of the people by
listening with attention and identify the words of the interlocutor without jump to conclusion and
understanding the context of each individual's whole person and his horizon. Furthermore, the
technique was suggested by the expertise was listening well that describe with the old learning
technique –Listening, Imagination, Questioning and Writing- and supported the regularity of
training in listening by distinguish conversation, talk and dialectics, and group discussion. The
results of this research can be used as a principle to prevention the social problems. However,
developing the management of life-long learning in a level of social immunity is suggested.

Article Details

How to Cite
สุวรรณณฑิต ด. (2019). Social Immunity in Phubbing Society. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (JHUSOC), 16(1), บทที่ 3 หน้าที่ 45–60. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhusoc/article/view/198393
Section
Research Article

References

กีรติบุญเจือ. (2546). ปรัชญาภาษาชาวบ้าน.กรุงเทพฯ : มหาวิทยาลัยเซนต์จอห์น.
วรภทัร์ภู่
เจริญ. (2552). Dialogue คิดลงสู่ในไหลลงสู่ปัญญา. กรุงเทพฯ:อริยชน.
เอนก สุวรรณบณั ฑิต,กีรติบุญเจือ.(2558). สังคมบนฐานความรู้กบั สันติภาพ. รมยสาร, 13(2):
149-59.
Augtein, R. & Wolff, G. (1976, May 31). Der Spiegel Interview with Martin Heidegger.
(Richardson, W.J. trans). Der Spiegel, pp. 193-219. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from
https://www.ditext.com/heidegger/interview.html.
Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical
inquiry. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Buber, M. (1998). Knowledge of man: Selected essays. Amherst, USA: Prometheus.
Gordon, M. (2011). Listening as embracing the Other. Educational Theory, 61; 207-19.
Haskell, RE. (2008). Deep listening: hidden meaning in everyday conversation. New York:
Perseus.

Heidegger, M. (1976). The question concerning technology and other essays. (Lovitt, W., Trans).
New York: Harper & Row.

Laryea, K. (2014). A pedagogy of deep listening in e-learning. Journal of Conscious Evolution.

Retrieved on August 31, 2015 from: https://www.cejournal.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/Deep.pdf

Microsoft. (2015). Attention span. Toronto: Microsoft Canada.

Morkunien, J. (2004). “The information society as knowledge based society”, in Social philosophy,

paradigm of contemporary thinking. Cultural heritage and contemporary change series IVA,
Eastern and central europe Vol.23. Council for research in values and philosophy: 196-207.
https://www.crvp.org/book/Series04/IVA-23/contents.htm

Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political
thought. Miami: MIT Press.

Walter, P. & Kop, R. (2009). Heidegger, digital technology and postmodern education. Bulletin of
science technology & society. Retrieved on March1, 2016 from https://bsts.sagepub.com