Mechanisms for Collaboration and Engagement in High-Value Agricultural and Food Business Groups, in Accordance with the Development Guidelines for New Economic Hubs within the Central-Western Economic Corridor
Keywords:
High-value agricultural, Cluster development, PPA-C Model, Quadruple HelixAbstract
This research aimed to: (1) examine the background information and current situation of high-value agricultural and food product clusters in the Central-Western Economic Corridor (CWEC); (2) design and prioritize potential clusters for development within the CWEC; (3) establish a stakeholder network cooperation mechanism; and (4) formulate policy recommendations for the CWEC, which encompasses four provinces: Kanchanaburi, Suphan Buri, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, and Nakhon Pathom. The study employed a qualitative methodology through participatory action research (PAR), grounded in a holistic development approach and the Quadruple Helix concept. A total of 75 key informants participated, including 33 representatives from government and state enterprises, 8 from the private sector and entrepreneurial ventures, 19 from academia and expert fields, and 15 from the community. Research instruments included secondary data sources, semi-structured interview guides, focus group discussions, and brainstorming sessions. Key informants were selected through purposive sampling based on direct institutional or community involvement in the CWEC development agenda; within each group, snowball referral was applied where access was limited. Data validity was ensured through methodological triangulation combining in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, documentary analysis and source triangulation across all four stakeholder groups. Qualitative content analysis followed systematic coding procedures, with inter-rater discrepancies resolved through structured discussion. Findings revealed that the CWEC possesses considerable potential for linking production bases to the ASEAN region, though challenges remain in infrastructure and policy integration. The evaluation of potential business clusters resulted in the following prioritization: (1) white shrimp and giant freshwater prawn, (2) tropical fruits, (3) rice, (4) tilapia and snakehead fish, and (5) beef cattle. Furthermore, the study developed the Public–Private–Academic–Community (PPA-C) Model, a contextualized Quadruple Helix cooperation mechanism for inclusive agro-food cluster governance in which communities serve as active co-producers rather than passive beneficiaries. Cluster potential was evaluated across four criteria: economic potential, market and export potential, sustainability and competitiveness, and readiness for development and impact; the five priority clusters (shrimp, tropical fruit, rice, freshwater fish, and beef cattle) yielded overall mean scores of 7.91, 7.81, 7.73, 7.60, and 6.60, respectively. Policy recommendations emphasize enhancing product value through technology, improving infrastructure, and expanding domestic and international markets. Short-, medium-, and long-term action plans are proposed to strengthen sustainable competitiveness.
References
Altenburg, T., & Meyer-Stamer, J. (1999). How to promote clusters: Policy experiences from Latin America. World Development, 27(9), 1693–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00081-9
Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3–4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00119.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Springer.
Eastern Economic Corridor Office. (2023). EEC investment progress report 2023. Office of the Eastern Economic Corridor.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2373-7
Glassman, J. (2018). Drums of war, drums of development: The formation of a Pacific ruling class and industrial transformation in East and Southeast Asia, 1945–1980. Brill.
Hope, A., & Cox, J. (2015). Development corridors (EPS-PEAKS Topic Guide). Overseas Development Institute.
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198
Katchwattana. (2023, March 14). Recognizing the potential of the Central–Western Economic Corridor (CWEC): Thailand’s emerging high-tech industrial base. https://www.salika.co/2023/03/14/strenght-of-cwec-economic-coorridor-for-hi-tech-industry/
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). SAGE.
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Routledge.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. MIT Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Miller, C. A., Richter, J., & O'Leary, J. (2016). Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.004
MoneyBuffalo. (2021, December 16). Which provinces are in the new economic corridor and what do people in the area get? https://www.moneybuffalo.in.th/economy/which-provinces-are-the-new-economic-corridor-what-do-people-in-the-area-get
Nakhon Pathom Provincial Agricultural and Cooperative Office. (2023). Draft provincial agricultural and cooperative development plan of Nakhon Pathom Province 2023–2027 (Revised edition 2026). Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.
https://www.opsmoac.go.th/nakhonpathom-strategic-files-452891791796
National Statistical Office. (2024a). Labour force survey of Kanchanaburi Province, Quarter 3: July–September 2023. https://kanchanaburi.nso.go.th/images/budget/2566/kcn-fdh-03-01.pdf
National Statistical Office. (2024b). Labour force survey of Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province, Quarter 3: July–September 2023. https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/file_or_link/2024/20240614111720_18774.pdf
National Statistical Office. (2024c). Labour force survey of Nakhon Pathom Province, Quarter 2: April–June 2024. https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/file_or_link/2024/20240902111530_52282.pdf
National Statistical Office. (2024d). Labour force survey of Suphan Buri Province, Quarter 3: July–September 2023. https://suphan.nso.go.th/images/attachment/research/Report_Q3_66.pdf
Nordberg, K. (2015). Enabling regional growth in peripheral non-university regions: The impact of a quadruple helix intermediate organization. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0241-z
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2025, February 13). The Thirteenth National Economic and Social Development Plan (2023–2027). https://www.nesdc.go.th/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/ 02/article_file_20230615134223.pdf
Office of the Prime Minister. (2018a). National Strategy 2018–2037. Office of the Prime Minister.
Office of the Prime Minister. (2024b). Report on Thailand’s agricultural export performance under free trade agreements. Office of the Prime Minister.
Poapongsakorn, N., & Pantakua, K. (2020). Thai agriculture in transition: Farming 4.0 policy. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI).
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.
Rigg, J., Salamanca, A., & Thompson, E. C. (2019). The puzzle of East and Southeast Asia's persistent smallholder. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.003
Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small-scale industry. Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422377
Science, Research and Innovation Promotion and Coordination Division. (2024). The role of higher education institutions in developing Thailand’s special economic zones. http://clinictech.ops.go.th/online/cmo/site_blog_show.asp?id=437
Senate Secretariat. (2024). Report on the development of the Central-Western Economic Corridor (CWEC). Bangkok: Senate Secretariat.
Sonobe, T., & Otsuka, K. (2006). Cluster-based industrial development: An East Asian model. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sukdanon. (2019). Economic corridor development and regional cooperation in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Transportation Institute, Chulalongkorn University.
Suphan Buri Provincial Agriculture and Cooperatives Office. (2023). Geographical Indication (GI) products: Suphan Buri water chestnut. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.
Wongpidavet, P. (2022). Industrial clustering and backward linkages in Thailand's Eastern Economic Corridor. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 39(2), 182–207. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae39-2d
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




