Decoding Voter Behavior: The Influence of Political Marketing on Electoral Decisions
Keywords:
Campaign finance, Political behavior, Political marketing, Political product, Voter decision-makingAbstract
This study employs a quantitative methodology to examine the influence of political marketing dimensions—promotion, product, price, and place—on voting decisions, utilizing data from 383 participants in Thailand’s central region. The central region was selected for its demographic diversity and socio-political significance, providing a representative context for understanding voting decisions. Data were collected using a structured survey and a 5-point Likert scale. Reliability across all constructs was confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha demonstrating strong internal consistency. Multiple regression analysis via SMART PLS revealed that political promotion and product strategies exert the most substantial impact on voter decisions, while accessibility and price play supportive roles. The findings underscore the critical importance of targeted promotional strategies and well-aligned political offerings in driving voter engagement. Recommendations include leveraging digital platforms and enhancing informational accessibility to increase participation. Although the study’s regional scope and reliance on self-reported data present certain limitations, the results provide valuable insights for political strategists seeking to strengthen democratic engagement and voter turnout in diverse contexts.
References
Adelson, B. (2019). Accessibility issues for poll sites and voters. In Brown, M., Hale, K., King, B. (Eds), The future of election administration (pp.47–53). Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18541-1_6
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality progress, 40(7), 64–65.
Blais, A., Daoust, J. F., Dassonneville, R., & Péloquin-Skulski, G. (2019). What is the cost of voting? Electoral Studies, 59, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2019.02.011
Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Brogaard, J., Dai, L., Ngo, P. T., & Zhang, B. (2020). Global political uncertainty and asset prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(4), 1737–1780. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488820
Couture, J., & Breux, S. (2017). The differentiated effects of health on political participation. The European Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw245
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Delice, A. (2003). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2001–2018.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
Fowler Jr., F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications.
Fuller, C., & Lucas, D. (2017). Pricing political rallies. Economic Affairs, 37(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12230
Gallay, R., & Giangrasso, R. A. (2015). The political candidate as a marketable product. In N.K. Malhotra (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1985 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 359-363). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16943-9_76
Guedea-Noriega, H. H., & García-Sánchez, F. (2018). SePoMa: Semantic-based data analysis for political marketing. In R. Valencia-García, G. Alcaraz-Mármol, J. Del Cioppo-Morstadt, N. Vera-Lucio, & M. Bucaram-Leverone (Eds.), Technologies and Innovation: 4th International Conference, CITI 2018, Guayaquil, Ecuador, November 6-9, 2018, Proceedings 4 (pp. 199–213). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00940-3_15
Gupta, K. (2015). Political marketing in India 2014: Case of new political product AAP.SSRN, 2917075. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2917075
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Hardiyanto, D., Wijaya, M., & Satyawan, I. A. (2023). Political marketing strategies through social media tools in Indonesia. Formosa Journal of Social Sciences (FJSS), 2(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjss.v2i3.5753
Harris, L., & Harrigan, P. (2015). Social media in politics: The ultimate voter engagement tool or simply an echo chamber? Journal of Political Marketing, 14(3), 251 - 283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2012.693059
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R.R. Sinkovics, & P.N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Hodler, R., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2015). The Effects of Voting Costs on the Democratic Process and Public Finances. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 141-171. https://doi.org/10.1257/POL.20120383
Houghton, D., Hamdan, Z. A., & Marder, B. (2017). Structured abstract: Political campaigning on Twitter—the use of language, message tone, and implications for political marketing communication from the UK General Election 2015. In M. Stieler (Eds.), Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends: Proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 1413-1419). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45596-9_260
Ibáñez, D. B., Calderón, C. A., Arroyave, J., & Silva, R. (2015). Influence of social networks in the decision to vote: An exploratory survey on the Ecuadorian electorate. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 6(4), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2015100102
Iqbal, Y., & Shabir, G. (2019). Influence of interpersonal communication sources on voting behaviour of youth. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(4), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-iv).26
Law, W. (2020). Decomposing political advertising effects on vote choices. Public Choice, 188(3), 525-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00849-8
Mathaisel, D., & Comm, C. (2021). Political marketing with data analytics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 9(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00097-1
Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Divakar, S. (2021). Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.01.003
Ndubuisi, V. N. (2023). Political marketing: A third force in political campaign. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(9), 444-455. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70938
Pizer, W., & Prest, B. (2016). Prices versus quantities with policy updating. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(3), 483 - 518. https://doi.org/10.1086/707142
Ramli, Y., Imaningsih, E. S., Shiratina, A., & Soelton, M. (2021). The Implication of Digital Marketing that Influence the Political Decision to Vote. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(4), 282-292.
Ratushnyak, O., & Glushenko, L. (2023). Formulation of the marketing price policy of the enterprise taking into account the psychological effects of price perception. Innovation and Sustainability, 1(3), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.91.98
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
Rodenburger, D. (2020). Political interest and the decision to vote: a self-selection problem. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30(2), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1560302
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




