Advancements in Household Classification Using Multiclass Decision Forest: A Case Study of the Kut Bak District, Sakon Nakhon Province
Keywords:
Machine learning, Multiclass decision forest, Poverty classification, Socio-Economic analysisAbstract
This study examines the classification of household poverty in Kut Bak District, Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand, using advanced machine learning techniques, specifically the Multiclass Decision Forest algorithm. The research pursued two main objectives: (1) to develop a robust model for classifying households into distinct poverty levels, and (2) to identify key socio-economic factors that significantly influence poverty classification. The dataset comprised 302 households, representing various socio-economic strata within the district. The study population consisted of 686 households, with the sample selected through a participatory process involving local community leaders and government officials. Nineteen socio-economic features were included in the model, such as household income, expenditures, and participation in local development projects. Households were classified into four poverty levels: extremely poor, moderately poor, marginally poor, and above poor. Model performance was evaluated using confusion matrices, yielding an overall accuracy of 94.4%, including perfect (100%) accuracy in classifying the extreme categories (extremely poor and above poor). The analysis further revealed that household income and participation in local projects were the most influential determinants of poverty levels. Specifically, households with low income and minimal project participation were most likely to fall into the “extremely poor” category, whereas those with higher income and multiple income sources were typically classified as “above poor.” The findings provide important insights into the socio-economic dynamics of poverty in rural Thailand and offer practical implications for designing targeted poverty alleviation strategies. More broadly, the study demonstrates the potential of machine learning approaches to address complex socio-economic challenges, thereby contributing to the field of development studies.
References
Adnan, M. N., Ip, R. H. L., Bewong, M., & Islam, M. Z. (2021). BDF: A new decision forest algorithm. Information Sciences, 569, 687-705.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 476-487.
Alsharkawi, A., Al-Fetyani, M., Dawas, M., Saadeh, H., & Alyaman, M. (2021). Poverty classification using machine learning: The case of Jordan. Sustainability, 13(3), 3.
Carter, M. R., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2),
-199.
Chakravarty, S. R., & Majumder, A. (2005). Measuring human poverty: A generalized index and an application using basic dimensions of life and some anthropometric indicators. Journal of Human Development, 6(3), 275-299.
Cooperman, A., McLarty, A. R., & Seim, B. (2022). Drivers of successful common-pool resource management: A conjoint experiment on groundwater management in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 74, 102512.
Gweshengwe, B., & Hassan, N. H. (2020). Defining the characteristics of poverty and their implications for poverty analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1768669.
Huang, K., & Xia, F. (2023). Classification of rural relative poverty groups and measurement of the influence of land elements: A questionnaire-based analysis of 23 poor counties in China. Land, 12(4), Article 4.
Islam, M., Kashem, S., Momtaz, Z., & Hasan, M. M. (2023). An application of the participatory approach to develop an integrated water resources management (IWRM) system for the drought-affected region of Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(3), e14260.
Kharas, H., & Dooley, M. (2022). The evolution of global poverty, 1990-2030. Retrieved May 4, 2023, from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-evolution-of- global-poverty-1990-2030/
Lemanski, C. (2016). Poverty: Multiple perspectives and
strategies. Geography, 101(1), 4-10.
Mah, J. C., Penwarden, J. L., Pott, H., Theou, O., & Andrew, M. K. (2023). Social vulnerability indices: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1253.
Mansi, E., Hysa, E., Panait, M., & Voica, M. C. (2020). Poverty—A Challenge for economic development? Evidences from Western Balkan countries and the European Union. Sustainability, 12(18), 18.
Morris, M. H., Santos, S. C., & Neumeyer, X. (2018). Poverty and entrepreneurship in developed economies. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Muñetón-Santa, G., Escobar-Grisales, D., López-Pabón, F. O., Pérez-Toro, P. A., & Orozco-Arroyave, J. R. (2022). Classification of poverty condition using natural language processing. Social Indicators Research, 162(3), 1413-1435.
Rokach, L. (2016). Decision forest: Twenty years of research. Information Fusion, 27, 111-125.
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2020). Explainable decision forest:
Transforming a decision forest into an interpretable
tree. Information Fusion, 61, 124-138.
Sihombing, P. R., & Arsani, A. M. (2021). Comparison of machine learning methods in classifying poverty in Indonesia in 2018. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 2(1), 51-56.
Talingdan, J. A. (2019). Performance comparison of different classification algorithms for household poverty classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (ICISE) (pp. 11-15). Shanghai: IEEE Computer Society.
Thorbecke, E. (2013). Multidimensional poverty: Conceptual and measurement issues. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
United Nations. (2023). 2023 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). In Human Development Reports. Retrieved December 12, from https://hdr.undp.org/content/2023-global-multidimensional-poverty-in-dex-mpi
Wikipedia. (2023). Kut Bak district. Retrieved May 4, 2023,
from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=
Kut_Bak_district&oldid=1151602823
Wong, S. Y. (2012). Understanding poverty: Comparing basic needs approach and capability approach (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2066179). Retrieved May 4, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?ab stract_id=2066179
World Bank. (2023a). World Bank East Asia and the Pacific economic update, October 2023: Services for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2023b). World development report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




