The Development of an e-Service Learning Model for Promoting a Digital Active Learning Community of Mainstreaming Students in Higher Education

Authors

  • Titiya Netwong Department of Information Technology, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
  • Bunpod Pijitkamnerd Department of Library and Information Sciences, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand
  • Suratchana Chuayrodmod Department of Finance, Suan Dusit University, Bangkok, 10300 Thailand

Keywords:

e-Service learning, Digital active learning Community, Mainstreaming,, Higher education

Abstract

This research was a development and innovative study. The objectives were 1) to develop a model of e-Service learning for promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, 2) to study the effectiveness of the e-Service learning model for promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, and 3) to study the
digital active learning community of mainstreaming students. The samples used in the research were as follows: 1) Three people consisted of experts for in-depth interviews, 2) 400 students participated to study the conditions of the mainstreaming
approach and to promote the digital active learning community, 3) seven people consisted of experts for the focus group, 4) 62 students participated to study the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students, and 5) five experts certified the model. The research instruments were as follows: 1) In-depth interview for the e-Service learning model for promoting the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, 2) a questionnaire to study the conditions of mainstreaming for promoting the digital active learning community, 3) an evaluation form for the model of the e-Service learning for
promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education was used to develop the model through a focus group, 4) the questionnaire on students' digital active learning community practices of mainstreaming students,
and 5) an assessment form certifying the model. The statistics used in the research were percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research results were as follows: 1. The e-Service learning model for promoting the digital active learning
community of mainstreaming students in higher education consisted of 1) the components of the e-Service learning model: 1.1) preparation, 1.2) electronic social service collaboration network, 1.3) digital technology, 1.4) digital product for academic services to society, 1.5) learning outcomes, and 1.6) assessment of the learning management. 2) The steps of e-Service learning of the mainstreaming stage were 2.1) team building, 2.2) community selection, 2.3) project organisation, 2.4) project implementation, 2.5) knowledge dissemination, and 2.6) summary and reflection of the knowledge. Furthermore, the qualified experts certified that the
developed model was appropriate at the highest level. 2. The implementation of the project consisted of 11 service recipients. The
digital products were logos of 11 community merchants who applied for services to promote their online products. The mainstreaming students developed the necessary skills in using the programme. This incentivised the learners to be aware of
contributing to the local community and creating pride and confidence in themselves. 3. For the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, the overview of being a proactive digital learning community of
students participating in practice was at a practical level every time. When considering each of the six aspects, it was found that the practice was at a practical level every time. These aspects are sorted in descending order as follows: Teamwork, knowledge reflection, learning exchange and communication, knowledge pursuit, knowledge transfer and linkage, while knowledge dissemination had a normal level.

References

Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online

learning: The theory and practice of online learning

(2nd ed.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.

Asvapoositkul, P. (2019). Service Learning in the Library and

Information Science Curriculum. Journal of Library

and Information Srinakharinwirot University, 12(1),

-111.

Cooper, T. & Scriven, R. (2017). Communities of inquiry in

curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths

and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of

Educational Technology, 33(4), 22-37.

Copeland, A. (2015). Teaching Digital Wisdom. Hybrid

Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://hybridpedagogy.org/

teaching-digital-wisdom/

Culcasi, I., Russo, C., & Cinque, M. (2022). E-Service-Learning

in Higher Education: Modelization of Technological

Interactions and Measurement of Soft Skills

Development. Journal of Higher Education Outreach

and Engagement, 26(3), 39-56.

Dapena, A., Castro, P. M., & Ares-Pernas, A. (2022). Moving

to e-Service Learning in Higher Education. Applied

Sciences, 2022 (12), 5462. https://doi.org/10.3390/

app12115462.

Díaz, J. E. M. & Saldaña, C. A. D. (2020). Virtual World as a

Resource for Hybrid Education. International Journal

of Emerging Technology in Learning (iJET), 15(15),

-109.

Dowing, S. (2012). Digital Learning Spaces-an alternative to

traditional Learning Management Systems? Research-

Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/

publication/268446149

Doyle, W. D. (1987). Magnetization reversal in films with

biaxial anisotropy, INTERMAG Conf., 2.2-1-2.2-6.

Guthrie, K. L. & McCracken, H. (2010a). Teaching and

learning social justice through online service-learning

courses. International Review of Research in Open and

Distance Learning, 11(3), 78-94.

Guthrie, K. L. & McCracken, H. (2010b). Reflective pedagogy:

Making meaning in experiential based online course.

The Journal of Educators Online, 7(2), 1-21.

He, W., Zha, S., Watson, & He, Y. (2022). Promoting Inclusive

Online Learning for Students with Disabilities in

Information Systems Courses. Journal of Information

Systems Education, 33(1), 7-14, Winter 2022.

International Federation of Library Associations and

Institutions. (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines.

Retrieved from Creative Commons. https://creative

commons.org/licenses/by/3.0

Jamiai, A. (2019, August 26). The Role of Netiquettes in

Establishing Relationships in Virtual Learning

Communities. International Journal of Language and

Literary Studies, 1(2), pp. 46-59. Retrieved from https://

doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v1i2.29

Kim, J. Y. & Fienup, D. M. (2022). Increasing Access to Online

Learning for Students With Disabilities During the

COVID-19 Pandemic. The Journal of Special Education,

(4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246692

Na-Songkhla, J. (2018). Digital Learning Design. Bangkok:

Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Netwong, T. (2014). Development of Information Technology

Literacy and Volunteers by Using Blended Learning

and Society Service Project Based Learning. Journal

of Industrial, 13(3), 59-65.

Netwong, T. (2019). The School Library Roles in Information

Services through Mainstreaming for Enhance 21st

Century Learning Skills. International Journal of

Information and Education Technology, 9(2), 154-158.

Netwong, T. (2021). Effectiveness Adaptive Blended Digital

Technology to Improve Learning Outcomes of Digital

Native Learners in the Situation of COVID-19. ASEAN

Journal of Education, 7(2), 45-54.

Office of Student Promotion and Development. (2018). Report

on the results of a survey on information about the

promotion and development of service systems to

support students, students with disabilities in higher

education institutions: Academic year 2018. Bangkok,

Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher

Education, Science, Research and Innovation.

Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education

Plan, 2017 – 2024. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the

Education Council.

Pijitkamnerd, B., Netwong, T., & Chuayrodmod, S. (2020).

E-Service Learning for Promoting Digital Active

Learning of Mainstreaming Students, Library and

Information Science Program. Journal of BSRU-Research

and Development Institute, 5(2), 169-181.

Rutgers University. (2019a). Active Learning Community.

Retrieved from Rutgers. https://dcs.rutgers.edu/activelearning/

community

Said, H., Ahmad, I., Yassin, M. A., Mansor, S. S., Hassan, Z.

& Alrubaay, I. (2014). Using e-service learning for

promoting digital citizenship. Life Science Journal,

(3), 154-159.

Shek, D. T. L., Li, X., Yu, L., Lin, L., & Chen, Y. (2022).

Evaluation of Electronic Service‑Learning (e‑Service‑

Learning) Projects in Mainland China under COVID‑19.

Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2022(17), 3175–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10058-8.

Strait, J. & Sauer, T. (2004). Constructing experiential learning

for online courses: The birth of e-service. Educause

Quarterly, 1(2004), 62-65.

Waldner, L. S., McGorry, S. Y. & Widener, M. C. (2012).

E-service learning: The evolution of service-learning

to engage a growing online student population. Journal

of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 16(2),

-150.

Waldner, L., McGorry, S. & Widener, M. C. (2010). Extreme

e-service learning (XE-SL): E-service learning in the

% online course. MERLOT Journal of Online

Learning and Teaching, 6(4), pp.839-851.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Netwong, T., Pijitkamnerd, B., & Chuayrodmod, S. (2023). The Development of an e-Service Learning Model for Promoting a Digital Active Learning Community of Mainstreaming Students in Higher Education. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 19(3). Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/274237

Issue

Section

Original Articles