The Development of an e-Service Learning Model for Promoting a Digital Active Learning Community of Mainstreaming Students in Higher Education
Keywords:
e-Service learning, Digital active learning Community, Mainstreaming,, Higher educationAbstract
This research was a development and innovative study. The objectives were 1) to develop a model of e-Service learning for promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, 2) to study the effectiveness of the e-Service learning model for promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, and 3) to study the
digital active learning community of mainstreaming students. The samples used in the research were as follows: 1) Three people consisted of experts for in-depth interviews, 2) 400 students participated to study the conditions of the mainstreaming
approach and to promote the digital active learning community, 3) seven people consisted of experts for the focus group, 4) 62 students participated to study the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students, and 5) five experts certified the model. The research instruments were as follows: 1) In-depth interview for the e-Service learning model for promoting the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, 2) a questionnaire to study the conditions of mainstreaming for promoting the digital active learning community, 3) an evaluation form for the model of the e-Service learning for
promoting a digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education was used to develop the model through a focus group, 4) the questionnaire on students' digital active learning community practices of mainstreaming students,
and 5) an assessment form certifying the model. The statistics used in the research were percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research results were as follows: 1. The e-Service learning model for promoting the digital active learning
community of mainstreaming students in higher education consisted of 1) the components of the e-Service learning model: 1.1) preparation, 1.2) electronic social service collaboration network, 1.3) digital technology, 1.4) digital product for academic services to society, 1.5) learning outcomes, and 1.6) assessment of the learning management. 2) The steps of e-Service learning of the mainstreaming stage were 2.1) team building, 2.2) community selection, 2.3) project organisation, 2.4) project implementation, 2.5) knowledge dissemination, and 2.6) summary and reflection of the knowledge. Furthermore, the qualified experts certified that the
developed model was appropriate at the highest level. 2. The implementation of the project consisted of 11 service recipients. The
digital products were logos of 11 community merchants who applied for services to promote their online products. The mainstreaming students developed the necessary skills in using the programme. This incentivised the learners to be aware of
contributing to the local community and creating pride and confidence in themselves. 3. For the digital active learning community of mainstreaming students in higher education, the overview of being a proactive digital learning community of
students participating in practice was at a practical level every time. When considering each of the six aspects, it was found that the practice was at a practical level every time. These aspects are sorted in descending order as follows: Teamwork, knowledge reflection, learning exchange and communication, knowledge pursuit, knowledge transfer and linkage, while knowledge dissemination had a normal level.
References
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online
learning: The theory and practice of online learning
(2nd ed.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Asvapoositkul, P. (2019). Service Learning in the Library and
Information Science Curriculum. Journal of Library
and Information Srinakharinwirot University, 12(1),
-111.
Cooper, T. & Scriven, R. (2017). Communities of inquiry in
curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths
and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 33(4), 22-37.
Copeland, A. (2015). Teaching Digital Wisdom. Hybrid
Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://hybridpedagogy.org/
teaching-digital-wisdom/
Culcasi, I., Russo, C., & Cinque, M. (2022). E-Service-Learning
in Higher Education: Modelization of Technological
Interactions and Measurement of Soft Skills
Development. Journal of Higher Education Outreach
and Engagement, 26(3), 39-56.
Dapena, A., Castro, P. M., & Ares-Pernas, A. (2022). Moving
to e-Service Learning in Higher Education. Applied
Sciences, 2022 (12), 5462. https://doi.org/10.3390/
app12115462.
Díaz, J. E. M. & Saldaña, C. A. D. (2020). Virtual World as a
Resource for Hybrid Education. International Journal
of Emerging Technology in Learning (iJET), 15(15),
-109.
Dowing, S. (2012). Digital Learning Spaces-an alternative to
traditional Learning Management Systems? Research-
Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/268446149
Doyle, W. D. (1987). Magnetization reversal in films with
biaxial anisotropy, INTERMAG Conf., 2.2-1-2.2-6.
Guthrie, K. L. & McCracken, H. (2010a). Teaching and
learning social justice through online service-learning
courses. International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 11(3), 78-94.
Guthrie, K. L. & McCracken, H. (2010b). Reflective pedagogy:
Making meaning in experiential based online course.
The Journal of Educators Online, 7(2), 1-21.
He, W., Zha, S., Watson, & He, Y. (2022). Promoting Inclusive
Online Learning for Students with Disabilities in
Information Systems Courses. Journal of Information
Systems Education, 33(1), 7-14, Winter 2022.
International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions. (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines.
Retrieved from Creative Commons. https://creative
commons.org/licenses/by/3.0
Jamiai, A. (2019, August 26). The Role of Netiquettes in
Establishing Relationships in Virtual Learning
Communities. International Journal of Language and
Literary Studies, 1(2), pp. 46-59. Retrieved from https://
doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v1i2.29
Kim, J. Y. & Fienup, D. M. (2022). Increasing Access to Online
Learning for Students With Disabilities During the
COVID-19 Pandemic. The Journal of Special Education,
(4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246692
Na-Songkhla, J. (2018). Digital Learning Design. Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
Netwong, T. (2014). Development of Information Technology
Literacy and Volunteers by Using Blended Learning
and Society Service Project Based Learning. Journal
of Industrial, 13(3), 59-65.
Netwong, T. (2019). The School Library Roles in Information
Services through Mainstreaming for Enhance 21st
Century Learning Skills. International Journal of
Information and Education Technology, 9(2), 154-158.
Netwong, T. (2021). Effectiveness Adaptive Blended Digital
Technology to Improve Learning Outcomes of Digital
Native Learners in the Situation of COVID-19. ASEAN
Journal of Education, 7(2), 45-54.
Office of Student Promotion and Development. (2018). Report
on the results of a survey on information about the
promotion and development of service systems to
support students, students with disabilities in higher
education institutions: Academic year 2018. Bangkok,
Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher
Education, Science, Research and Innovation.
Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education
Plan, 2017 – 2024. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the
Education Council.
Pijitkamnerd, B., Netwong, T., & Chuayrodmod, S. (2020).
E-Service Learning for Promoting Digital Active
Learning of Mainstreaming Students, Library and
Information Science Program. Journal of BSRU-Research
and Development Institute, 5(2), 169-181.
Rutgers University. (2019a). Active Learning Community.
Retrieved from Rutgers. https://dcs.rutgers.edu/activelearning/
community
Said, H., Ahmad, I., Yassin, M. A., Mansor, S. S., Hassan, Z.
& Alrubaay, I. (2014). Using e-service learning for
promoting digital citizenship. Life Science Journal,
(3), 154-159.
Shek, D. T. L., Li, X., Yu, L., Lin, L., & Chen, Y. (2022).
Evaluation of Electronic Service‑Learning (e‑Service‑
Learning) Projects in Mainland China under COVID‑19.
Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2022(17), 3175–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10058-8.
Strait, J. & Sauer, T. (2004). Constructing experiential learning
for online courses: The birth of e-service. Educause
Quarterly, 1(2004), 62-65.
Waldner, L. S., McGorry, S. Y. & Widener, M. C. (2012).
E-service learning: The evolution of service-learning
to engage a growing online student population. Journal
of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 16(2),
-150.
Waldner, L., McGorry, S. & Widener, M. C. (2010). Extreme
e-service learning (XE-SL): E-service learning in the
% online course. MERLOT Journal of Online
Learning and Teaching, 6(4), pp.839-851.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.