Research on the Development Potential of Cultural Resources and Community Participation in Huaiyang Community

Authors

  • Yaohui Ruan Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand
  • Chakapong Phaetlakfa Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand
  • I-na Phuyuthanon Faculty of Fine Arts, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand

Keywords:

Community participation, Culture resource, Development potential, Cultural management model, Huaiyang community

Abstract

This study examines the cultural resources of the Huaiyang community with the aim of proposing strategies for cultural management, development models, and cultural innovation projects. A mixed approach combining field research and literature review was employed to provide a systematic understanding of Huaiyang’s historical evolution, geographical context, and cultural background. To further explore cultural resources and community perspectives, focus group interviews were conducted with 23 long-term residents. The data were analyzed using content analysis to identify cultural resources with strong development potential and the core elements of community participation in cultural management. Based on these findings, strategies for enhancing community involvement were proposed using an empowerment model. The study ultimately introduces a comprehensive framework for community cultural management and development in Huaiyang, articulated
through the following dimensions: Human-Centered (Participating Groups), Culture-Carrier (Community Culture), Space-Supported (Locales), Scenery-Relied
(Environmental Facilities), Production-Based (Cultural Industry), and Management-Oriented (Design Process). This framework underscores the integration of cultural heritage, spatial environments, community empowerment, and cultural industries to promote sustainable development and participatory cultural management in the Huaiyang community.

References

Benn, R. (1997). Adults count too: Mathematics for empowerment. UK: NIACE.

Bianchini, F. (2004). A crisis in urban creativity? Reflections on the cultural impacts of globalisation, and on the potential of urban cultural policies. Retrieved May 4, 2023, from http://artfactories.net/IMG/pdf/crisis_urban_

creatvity.pdf

Borer, M. I. (2006). The location of culture: The urban culturalist

perspective. City & Community, 5(2), 173–197.

Dahles, H. (2013). Tourism, heritage and national culture in

Java: Dilemmas of a local community. Abingdon, UK:

Routledge.

Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Girard, L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Cultural tourism and

sustainable local development. Farnham, UK: Ashgate

Publishing.

Green, G. P., & Haines, A. (2015). Asset building & community development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Huntington, S. P., & Jervis, R. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Finance and Development – English Edition, 34(2), 51.

Lee, Y.-J. (2015). Creating memorable experiences in a reuse heritage site. Annals of Tourism Research, 55, 155–170.

Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban

livability and tourism development in China: Analysis

of sustainable development by means of spatial panel

data. Habitat International, 68, 99–107.

Meadowcroft, J. (2004). Participation and sustainable development:

Modes of citizen, community and organisational

involvement. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for

sustainable development: The challenge of adapting

form to function (pp. 162–190). Cheltenham, UK:

Edward Elgar Publishing.

Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for

development in the Third World: Theory and practice

for empowerment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mingruo, Z. (2006). Health promotion and community

participation (ii). Health Education and Health

Promotion, 2(6).

Moemeka, A. A. (1994). Communicating for development: A new pan-disciplinary perspective. New York, NY:

SUNY Press.

Mohan, G., & Stokke, K. (2000). Participatory development

and empowerment: The dangers of localism.

Third World Quarterly, 21(2), 247-268.

Rahman, M. A. (1993). The theoretical standpoint of PAR

[Participatory Action-Research]. In O. Fals-Borda &

M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking

the monopoly with participatory action-research. New

York, NY: Apex Press.

Roders, P., & Hasebe. (2019). Reshaping urban conservation.

London, UK: Springer.

Selman, P. (2004). Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,

(3), 365-392.

Timothy, D. J. (2006). Empowerment and stakeholder

participation in tourism destination communities. In

A. Church & T. Coles (Eds.), Tourism, power and

space (pp. 213-230). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Turley, A. (2015). Urban culture: Exploring cities and cultures. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Worku Tadesse, G. (2023). Heritage resources as a driver of cultural tourism development in Ethiopia: A review.

Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2158623.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

Ruan, Y., Phaetlakfa, C. ., & Phuyuthanon , I.- na . (2025). Research on the Development Potential of Cultural Resources and Community Participation in Huaiyang Community. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 21(2), 248–260. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/272040

Issue

Section

Original Articles