Improving Seventh-Grader Online Learning Engagement Using Assessment Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies
Keywords:
Student Online Learning Engagement, Assessment for Learning, Assessment as LearningAbstract
The global spread of COVID-19 necessitated a shift from classroom-based to online learning, resulting in decreased student engagement at an inner-city school in Bangkok. This article explores the use of assessment feedback and self-regulated learning strategies to enhance student engagement. The researchers employed a two-cycle action research model, consisting of four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The study was conducted over four weeks with 35 seventh-grade students, using observations, semi-structured interviews, and content analysis during each cycle. The findings revealed an increase in student participation, with more students consistently logging into class and remaining engaged throughout. Additionally, students demonstrated the confidence to turn on their cameras to greet peers and showed a greater commitment to learning. Peer support emerged as an important factor in their studies. Teachers provided feedback through Google Classroom and e-Portfolios, promoting student autonomy, which led to increased engagement and fostered desirable learning behaviors that may be applicable in other educational contexts.
References
Bartlett, J. (2015). Outstanding assessment for learning in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Chappuis, J. & Stiggins, R.J. (2017). Student-involved assessment for learning. (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Creswell, J.W, & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. (4th ed.). Singapore: SAGE.
Darling-Aduana, J. (2019). Behavioral engagement shifts among at-risk high school students enrolled in online courses. AERA Open, 5(4).
DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4).
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Linking learner factors, teaching context, and engagement patterns with MOOC learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 688–708.
Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers and Education, 120, 213-226.
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). California: Corwin Press.
Fakcharoenphol, W. (2020). Readiness to implement online learning management under the Covid-19 pandemics. Journal of Education and Human Development Sciences, 4(1), 44-61.
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 25.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2022). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (2nd ed.)(pp. 97–131). Boston: Springer.
Gayton, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132.
Guo, J. D. (2018). Building bridges to student learning: Perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes among Chinese undergraduates.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 195-208.
Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77, 81–112.
Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192.
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in Technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53.
Hodgson, Y., Benson, R. & Brack, C. (2013). Using action research to improve student engagement in a peer-assisted learning program. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 359-375.
Hong, J. C., Lee, Y. F., & Ye, J. H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and individual differences, 174, 110673.
Keeley, P. (2016). Science formative assessment: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. USA: SAGE Publications.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., and. Nixon, R. (2016). The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. New York: Springer.
Nguyen,T.D., Cannata,M., & Miller,J (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174.
Martin, F. & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205- 222.
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom assessment: principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131.
Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sanchez, R., & Vallespin-Aran, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A., (2020) A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=126_126988-t63lxosohs&title=A-framework-to-guide-an-education-response-to-the-Covid-19-Pandemic-of-2020
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.
Stanley, T., & Alig, J. (2014). The school leader's guide to formative assessment: using data to improve student and teacher achievement. New York: Routledge.
Wang, H., Tlili, A., Lehman, J.D., Lu, H., and Huang,R. (2021). Investigating feedback implemented by instructors to support online competency-based learning (CBL): a multiple case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 5.
Wang, C., Mirzaei, T., Xu, T. et al. (2022). How learner engagement impacts non-formal online learning outcomes through value co-creation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(32).
Wisniewski, B, Zierer K and Hattie J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: a meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)(pp. 541–546). Pergamon: Elsevier.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
