Prototype School on Development of Morals and Ethics for Early Childhood in the 21st Century
Keywords:
Moral and ethics, Physical literacy, Outcome mapping, Early childhoodAbstract
This research aimed to develop an outcome mapping workshop, assesment criteria, and quality assessment of prototype school on the development of morals and ethics for early childhood in the 21st Century. The participants were boundary partners from 4 schools under the Nakhon Nayok Primary Educational Service Area Office, Nakhon Nayok Province, Academic Year 2021, consisting of 20 people; 14 direct partners and 6 strategic partners. Participants wereselected by using purposive sampling technique. The participants attended a 2-day outcome mapping workshop for the prototype school on the development of morals and ethics for early childhood in the 21stcentury. Then, the appropriateness of the outcome mapping workshop was examined in order to investigate the efficiency and effectiveness, and ensure standards of accuracy, suitability, feasibility, and advantages. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and quantitative data was analyzed using basic statistics including percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
The results showed that prototype school on the development of morals and ethnics for early childhood in the 21st century consisted of 3 major steps and 12 minor steps. The evaluation criteria for the prototype school on development of the morals and ethics of early childhood in the 21st century consisted of 17 indicators, 88 practical criteria. The quality of the outcome mapping worskhop consisted of two components: 1) the efficiency and effectiveness based on weight of assesesment cirteria before and after the experiement according to the pre and post experiment increased; and 2) the verification of the results and evaluation criteria for standardized outcome mapping was accurate, suitable, and feasible. The overall usefulness was scored at a very good level.
References
Abbema, E. A., Assema, P. V., Kok, G. J., Leeuw, E. D., & Vries, N. K. D. (2004). Effect evaluation of a comprehensive community intervention aimed at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in the Netherlands. Health Promotion International, 19(2), 141-156.
Amo, C. (2009). Investigating the relationship between process use and use of evaluation findings in a government context (Master Thesis). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Beare, H., Caldwell Brain J., & Millkan, Ross H. (1989). Creating an excellent school. New York: Routlede.
Bradshaw, G. L. (2007). What teacher think: A correlational study of the social–emotional-moral perspectives of elementary teachers, Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(01), 160 A.
Bunprasup, S. (1998). A study of committee performance in primary schools : A case study of Bansawai School under the Surin Primary Educational Service Area Office (Master Thesis). Sinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Orlando: Harcourt.
Chatchaikham, E.(1999). Participation in School Management of School committees under the Educational Office in Prao District, Chiang Mai Province (Master Thesis). Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Duangsamran, K. (2000). Motivation in Working that Affects Relationship of Teachers in Primary Schools under the Nontaburi Primary Educational Service Area Office (Master Thesis). Silapakorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Duckworth, A. L. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.
Earl, S., & Carden, F. (2002). Learning from Complexity: The International Development Research Centre’s Experience with Outcome Mapping. Development in Practice 12, (3–4): 518–524.
Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2004). Outcome mapping. foreword by Michael Quinn Patton. international development Research Centre (IDRC). Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Fetterman, D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice. In Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self assessment and accountability, 75-92. Edited by Fetterman, D. M., S. J.
Kaftarian, and A. Wersman Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. Kanjanawasee, S. (2017). Evaluation Theory. (5th Ed.). Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Printing.
Kangpeng, S. (2008). Administrative Factors influencing Effectiveness of Schools: Development and Validity Assessment of Prototype. (Doctoral Dissertation). Khon Kaen University. Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Keyte, C. (2014). How to Develop Meaningful Key Performance Indicators. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://www.intrafocus.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/Developing Meaningful-Key-Performance-IndicatorsV5.pdf.
Majan., W. (2001). Professional Morality Conduct of Teachers in administrators’ of secondary schools under the Department of General education Khon Kaen (Master Thesis). Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
Molee, P. (2005). New Dimension of educational institute administration to be quality organizations. Nontaburi : Depsirin School.
National Moral Promotion Committee. (2019). Promotion of morals, sufficiency, discipline, honesty, service mind, and making good citizen to society. Bangkok : Pimdee Company Limited.
Pajarn S. (2009). Research and development of participation process of parents on the cultivation morals and ethics for Prathomsuksa 1 students: Application of outcome mapping process. (Master Thesis). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Penney, D., & Chandler, T. (2000). Physical Education: What future(s)? Sport, Education and Philosophy and Theory, 5(1), 71-87.
Pinyoanantapong, S. (2002). New Assessment and Evaluation : Early Childhood. Bangkok : Srinakarinwirot University.
Ragumpol, N. (2013). Outcome mapping of the royal development projects on education. (Doctoral Dissertation). Silpakorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Simarak, C. (2010). Management of Preschool Educational Centers under the standards of Department of Local Administration in Loei Province (Master Thesis). Loei Rajabhat University, Loei, Thailand.
Simarak, J. (2010). Management of Preschool Educational Centers under the standards of Department of Local Administration in Loei Province (Master Thesis). Loei Rajabhat University, Loei, Thailand.
Singer, D. (2006). Play=Learning. London: Oxford University Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1981). Evaluation Models. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tapkhwa, N. (2014). Participation of Schools Parents Andcommunityenhancing for Students' Quality in Schools Under The Office of Khon Kaen Primary Educational Service Area 1 (Master Thesis). Khon Kaen University. Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Tangchuang, P. & Mounier, A. (2009). Research Programmes and building research Capacity within the Central for Education and labour Studies (CELS) 2008-2011: experiences, lessons, perspective and prospects. Jounal of Education Chiang Mai University, 36(1-2), 91-113.
Thanwiset, K. (2008). Efficiency Evaluation of Assessment and Evaluation of Schools under the Chaiyaphum Educational Service Area Office (Master Thesis). Sukhothai Thammathirat University, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Tirakanan, S. (2017). Project Evaluation: Guidelines to Practice (7th Ed.). Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Printing.
Wisetsiri, P. (2007). Guidelines for Educational Management for Local Development. Academic Talk, Local Educational Management Fair 2007. n.p.
Whitehead, M. (2016). International Physical Literacy Association Plymouth: International Physical Literacy Association. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://www.physicalliteracy.org.uk.
Wongsangduen, P., Boonpu, S., Ngamprakon, S.,& Sangsisuliya, S. (2018). Learning management of Buddhist schools for secondary schools in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Karusart Parithat Journal, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn Ratchawittayalai. 5(1). 202-210.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
