การพัฒนาแบบตรวจสอบรายการประเมินตนเองเพื่อพัฒนาทักษะการแก้ปัญหา ทางคณิตศาสตร์ สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นประถมศึกษาปีที่ 6
Keywords:
Checklist, Self-Assessment, Solving Mathematical ProblemsAbstract
This research aims to create and develop the self-assessment checklist in solving
mathematical problems of the 6th grade students in order to determine the quality of the
self-assessment checklist for solving mathematical problems of 6th grade students and to
study the result of using the self-assessment checklist for solving mathematical problems
of 6th-grade students. The sample group was 30 students in Grade 6 of two schools
affiliated with the Office of Elementary Education, Pathumthani Area 2. The consistency of
the data was obtained from several evaluative methods such as calculating the coefficient
of consistency of Kendall’s coefficient of concordance: W, frequency (f) average ( χ
) and
percentage (%). Presentation was done along with profiles of students’ development. The
results show that the self-assessment checklist in solving mathematical of 6th-grade
students according to Polya hadfour check points. The index of congruency of the content
validity was between 0.80-1.00. as evaluated by experts. The reliability between the
researcher and the two teachers was 0.7656 at a significant level of .05. Show that
student’s mathematical problem solving skills increased.
References
Measurement. 2nd ed. Washington D.C. : American Council on Education.
Brennan, R.L. (1972). A Generalized Upper-Lower Discrimination Index. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 32, 289-303.
Chaiprond, C. (2011). Activities for teaching mathematics at a strategy for solving
problems the variety to enhance their ability to solve mathematical function.
for students in the Master Of Education Thesis 4. (Master’s thesis). Srinakharinwirot
University, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Hemwiseat, P. (2008). The activities of teaching math strategies used in problem solving.
The variety to enhance their ability to solve mathematical problems for high
school students. 3. (Master’sthesis). Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology Agency. (2008). Skills/
mathematical processes. Bangkok : Teachers Lat. (in Thai)
Kendall, M. (1975). Multivariate Analysis. London : Charles Griffin & Company.
Kungapiruk, K. (2005). Research and development checklist for evaluation, self-evaluation
of teachers Management Science Instruction using the learning cycle of seven E.
(Master’s thesis). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok. (in Thai)
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2012). PISA 2012
Mathematics Framework To Oecd, November 30, 2010 Retrieved April 1, 2013,
from http:// www.oecd.org/dataoecd.
Panhoon, S. (2005). The development of the checklist evaluation of empowermen to
develop Skills. The evaluation of teachers and students. (Doctoral’s dissertation).
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok. (in Thai)
PISA project Zealand Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology.
(2010). Assessment, PISA 2009. Bangkok : Arun printing. (in Thai)
PISA. (2012). Results in Focus. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
keyfindings/pisa-2012- results.htm. (in Thai)
Polya, (1957). How to Solve It : A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. New York :
Doubleday and Company Garden City.
Saiyos, L. & Saiyos, A. (1993). Technical Educational Research. 3rd ed. Bangkok : Academic
Support Center. Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Sripattanapipat, S. (2002). The development of the checklist to assess key evaluation.
How to assess the suitability of the school. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University.
(in Thai)
Williams. (2003). Writing about the Problem-Solving Process to Improve Problem-Solving
erformance. Journal Mathematics Teacher. 96(3) : 185-187.
