การแปลเชิงกฎหมาย กรณีศึกษาวิเคราะห์การใช้ค�าว่า Shall ในฉบับแปลภาษาอังกฤษ ของรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย พ.ศ. 2550**
Keywords:
Legal Translation, Legalese, Plain English, Translation StudiesAbstract
General translation is a complicated language process. It poses the difficulty of
changing a text of the source language into the target language. The ultimate goal of it is to create the same effect of the source text on the target text. Legal translation imposes even more complexities of translating due to the nature of the law and its contingency upon a specific culture and language. This research explored the use of the English modal auxiliary verb ‘shall’ in the translated versions of the Thai Constitution B.E. 2550. It was based on the dynamic equivalence concept of Eugene Nida. The research findings demonstrated the
problematic use of ‘shall’ and how inappropriate use of it provided attributes to assist
translators in better understanding of legal translation.
References
ASEAN Secretariat. (2008). The ASEAN Charter. Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat. Balazs, M. (2013). Legal Translation as an Interspace of Language and Law. The Proceedings of the International Conference Literature, Discourse and Multicultural Dialogue (pp. 357-364). Tîrgu-Mureş: Arhipelag XXI Press. Bassnett, S. (2002). Translation Studies. New York: Routledge. Cao, D. (2007). Translating Law. Great Britain: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Cooper, P. K. (2011). Is There a Case for the Abolition of ‘Shall’ from EU Legislation?. Latvia: RGSL Research Papers No. 1, Riga Graduate School of Law. Crabbe, V.C.R.A.C. (1989). The Legislative Sentence. Statute Law Review, 10(2), 79-94. Crystal, D. (1986). I Shall and I Will. English Today, 2, 42-44. D’Avanzo, S. (2009). The Role of Shall and Should in Two International Treaties. CADAAD, 3(1), 36-45. Duarte, C. & A. Martinez. (1995). El Lenguaje Jurídico. Buenos Aires: A-Z Editora. Eastwood, J. (2002). Oxford Guide to English Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. El-Farahaty, E. (2008). Legal Translation: Theory and Practice. Journal of the Saudi Association of Languages and Translation, 1, 7-30. Frost, R. E. (2012). Words of Authority in Legal Drafting: The Problem with Shall. Oregon State Bar Bulletin. Garner, B. (2012). Shall We Abandon Shall?. ABA Journal. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/shall_we_abandon_shall. Garzone, G. (1999). The Translation of Legal Texts a Functional Approach in a Pragmatic
Perspective, TEXTUS (Translation Studies Revisted), XII(2), 393-409. Kenneth, A. A. (2007). Contract Drafting. Making Sense of ‘Shall’. New York Law Journal.
Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://adamsdrafting.com/downloads/nyljshall-101807.pdf.Kimble, J. (1992). The Many Misuses of ‘Shall’. Scribes J. Legal Writing, 61, 61-64. Kunnecke, M. (2013). Translation in the EU: Language and Law in the EU’s Judicial Labyrinth. The Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2, 243-260. Nida, E.A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Sarcevic, S. (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation. London: Kluwer Law International. Sarcevic, S. (2000). Legal Translation and Translation Theory: A Receiver-oriented Approach. In La Traduction Juridique: Histoire, Theorie(s) et Practique, Geneva: Universite de Geneve Ecole de Traduction et d’Interpretation/ASTTI, 329-347. Stolze, R. (2013). Translation and Law. SYNAPS The Journal of Professional Communication, 28, 3-13. Tessuto, G. (2008). Drafting Laws in UK Settings: Implementing Plain English and Discourse. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.federalismi.it/document/08012008030941. pdf.
Perspective, TEXTUS (Translation Studies Revisted), XII(2), 393-409. Kenneth, A. A. (2007). Contract Drafting. Making Sense of ‘Shall’. New York Law Journal.
Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://adamsdrafting.com/downloads/nyljshall-101807.pdf.Kimble, J. (1992). The Many Misuses of ‘Shall’. Scribes J. Legal Writing, 61, 61-64. Kunnecke, M. (2013). Translation in the EU: Language and Law in the EU’s Judicial Labyrinth. The Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2, 243-260. Nida, E.A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Sarcevic, S. (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation. London: Kluwer Law International. Sarcevic, S. (2000). Legal Translation and Translation Theory: A Receiver-oriented Approach. In La Traduction Juridique: Histoire, Theorie(s) et Practique, Geneva: Universite de Geneve Ecole de Traduction et d’Interpretation/ASTTI, 329-347. Stolze, R. (2013). Translation and Law. SYNAPS The Journal of Professional Communication, 28, 3-13. Tessuto, G. (2008). Drafting Laws in UK Settings: Implementing Plain English and Discourse. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.federalismi.it/document/08012008030941. pdf.
Downloads
Published
2019-04-30
How to Cite
Suksiripakonchai, W. . (Ph.D.). (2019). การแปลเชิงกฎหมาย กรณีศึกษาวิเคราะห์การใช้ค�าว่า Shall ในฉบับแปลภาษาอังกฤษ ของรัฐธรรมนูญแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย พ.ศ. 2550**. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 14(3), 173–192. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/186647
Issue
Section
Invitation
