Policy Management Model to Drive Natural Resources and the Environment towards Sustainability According to PESTLE Guidelines
Keywords:
Sustainability, Policy, EnvironmentalAbstract
Policy management model to drive natural resources and the environment towards sustainability according to PESTLE guidelines has objectives for analyzing natural resources and environmental management according to PESTLE guideline and using multi-utility theory to prioritize Policy management model to drive natural resources and the environment towards sustainability according to PESTLE guidelines. This research has been divided into 2 parts namely, in-depth interview and multi-utility assessment. Key informants for 17 persons are academics, specialists and university professors who are expert in natural resources and environmental management. Research tools are the interview and multi-utility assessment, statistic used in this research are frequency, percentage and content analysis and Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) with key informants for 7 persons. Research result found that 1) Natural resources and environmental management according to PESTLE guideline consists of political situation, economy, social, technology, law and environmental factor. 2) Using Multi-utility theory to prioritize natural resources and environmental management model to sustainability, analysis result, priority level of natural resources and environmental management model to sustainability found that priority level of natural resources and environmental management model to sustainability in aspect of law adjustment that is conflict and causes gap or obstacle in operation has the most value, follow by an operation according to country reform proposal in natural resources and environment, then advocating knowledge to public have priority level equal to 49.34, 27.62 and 23.04 respectively. the results of analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) on consistency of all dimensions were ranged from 0.080 – 0.096 with the lowest value of 0.01 that was in acceptable level and consistent ion all dimensions. It could be concluded that the experts agreed with the Model of Natural Resources and Environment Management for Sustainability and it could be applied.
References
จันทนา อินทปัญญา. (2548). การจัดการสิ่งแวดล้อมและการพัฒนาอย่างยั่งยืน. วารสารการจัดการสิ่งแวดล้อม, 1(1), 2-3.
สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2550). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สุภางค์ จันทวานิช. (2552). การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลในการวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 9). กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2546). การพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืน: เอกสารประกอบการประชุมประจำปี 2546. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.
Altschuld, J. W. (2003). Delphi Techniques. lecture, Applied evaluation Design. The Ohio State University.
André Andrade Longaray et al. (2015). Assessment of a Brazilian public hospital’s performance for management purposes: A soft operations research case in action. Operations Research for Health Care, 5, 28-48.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hadadian, A. R., & Rasoulian, A. (2017). Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Selecting the Appropriate Country for Economic Integration (Case of Iran’s Foreign Trade with OIC Countries). International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 162(July).
Intapanya, J. (2005). Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. Environmental management and sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, 1(1), 1-20.
Kraft, M. E. (2003). Environmental Policy and Politics (3rd ed.). Harrisonburg: Pearson Education.
Kunmin, Z. Zongguo, W. Liying, P. (2007). Environmental Policies in China: Evolvement, Features and Evaluation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(2), March 2007.
McMillan, T. T. (1971). The Delphi Technique. paper presented at annual meeting of California Junior. In College Association Commission on Research and Development, (3 May 1971) Monterrey California.
Photisita, C. (2011). Science and Art of Qualitative Research. 5th edition. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing.
Posavac, E., & Carey, R. (1980). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chantawanitch, S. (2009). Qualitative research methods. 17th edition. Bangkok: Publisher of Chulalongkorn University
Wongwanitch, S. (2007). Needs assessment research. Bangkok: Publisher of Chulalongkorn University.
