Right to Work for Refugees Claiming Asylum: An Examination of Dutch Policies and Practices

Main Article Content

Paulien Dijkstra

Abstract

Nowadays, asylum has become a key political and policy issue as refugees claiming asylum are categorized or labeled as asylum seekers and are left in what may be described as a transitory state. This leads to a hierarchical system in which refugees are not allowed to receive their full rights until they are qualified as refugees by the government handling their asylum claim. The focus of this article is on refugees claiming asylum and their right to work. While the right to work should be guaranteed for refugees claiming asylum, as it is enshrined in international human rights law, this right is actually severely restricted and / or limited, and there are vast inconsistencies. In this article, the major international (regional) and national standards regarding the right to work for refugees claiming asylum are summarized, compared and discussed. In order to understand how the inconsistencies come about between the existence of acknowledged rights, laid down in a legal framework, and the assertion of these rights on the ground level, a case study in the Netherlands is provided. This national case study clarifies some of the obstacles which refugees claiming asylum face while trying to obtain this right, and sheds some light on the means of the right to work and the needs of this group of people. The influence of the makeup of the Dutch reception facilities and its bureaucracy regarding procedures and practices are analyzed. Political, societal and economic factors circling around and shaping the legal framework are also assessed as an influence upon the difficult assertion of the right to work on the ground level. While the Netherlands is regarded within the international arena as a promoter of human rights, it becomes clear that the Netherlands narrows down the right to work for this group of people. This article tries to create a better understanding about the major themes, problems and difficulties surrounding the right to work for refugees claiming asylum.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dijkstra, P. (2016). Right to Work for Refugees Claiming Asylum: An Examination of Dutch Policies and Practices. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 21(2), S–2. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/71940
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Paulien Dijkstra, Mahidol University, Thailand

Corresponding author

References

• Bloch, A. & Schluster, L. (2002). Asylum and Welfare: Contemporary Debates. Critical Social Policy, vol. (22), 393-414.

• Cholewinski, R. (Spring 2000). Economic and Social Rights of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Europe. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, vol. 14 (3), 709-755.

• European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2011). Refugees in the EU. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from: http://ecre.org/refugees/refugees/refugees-in-the-eu.html

• Franssen, K. (2007). National report on the Implementation of the Directive on reception Conditions for Asylum seekers in: The Netherlands, Odysseus Network for the European Commission.

• Ghorashi, H. (2005). Agents of Change or Passive Victims: The Impact of Welfare States (the Case of the Netherlands) on Refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 18 (2), 181-198.

• Goodwin- Gill, G. S. (2008). Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Geneva 8 July 1951 and the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees New York 31 January 1967. United Nations audiovisual library of international law. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from:

http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/prsr/prsr.html

• Human Rights Watch. (2005. November). Ukraine: On the Margins Rights Violations against Migrants and Asylum Seekers at the New Eastern Border of the European Union. Human Rights Watch, vol. 17 (8), (D). Retrieved: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/ukraine1105/

• Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Ministry of Security and Justice. (2007, April). The Procedure at the Application Center. (De Procedure in het Aanmeldcentrum). IND Website. Retrieved February 10, 2009 from: http://www.ind.nl/nl/Images/Factsheet_NL_Procedure_tcm5-17831.pdf

• Korac, M. (2003). Integration and How We facilitate it: A Comparative Study of the Settlement Experiences of Refugees in Italy and the Netherlands. Sociology, vol. 37, 51-68.

• Lester, E. (2005, June). Work, the Right to Work, and Durable Solutions: A Study on Sierra Leonean Refugees in the Gambia. International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 17 (2). 331-93.

• Ministry Of Social Affairs and Employment (2007, October 12). Appendix procedure AmvB employment law (Voorhangprocedure AmvB wet arbeid). Rijksoverheid.

• Nowak, M. (2005). Introduction to the International Human Rights Regime. Brill Academic Publishers: Leiden.

• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights. (2006). The Core International Human Rights Treaties. UN, New York.

• Parliamentary Document (2007, October 12). Draft decision to amend the resolution for enactment of the alien labor law to increase labor possibilities for asylum seekers (Ontwerpbesluit tot wijziging van het besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen tot vergroting van de arbeidsmogelijkheden van asielzoekers). Rijksoverheid. Retrieved June 20, 2011 from:

http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2007/10/12/ontwerpbesluit-tot-wijziging-van-het-besluit-uitvoering-wet-arbeid-vreemdelingen-tot-vergroting-van-de-arbeidsmogelijkheden-van-asielzoekers.html

• Phillimore, J. & Goodson, L. (2006, September). Problems or Opportunity? Asylum Seekers, Refugees, Employment and Social Exclusion in Deprived Urban Areas. Urban Studies, vol. 43 (10), 1715-1736.

• Schulinck. (2011, April 25). Manual Integration Law (Handboek Wet inburgering). Nieuwsbrief Schulinck. Nieuwsbrief Schulinck.

• UNHCR. (2002). Toolboxes on EU Asylum Matters: Tool Box 2: The Instruments. UNHCR, Geneva, September.

• United Nations General Assembly. (1948, December 10). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN, New York, United States of America.

• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2001). Refugee Protection: a Guide to International Refugee Law. InterParliamentary Union, Geneva.

• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2010). UNODC Website. Retrieved July 24 from: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/tocta-2010.html

• United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966, December 16). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), UN, New York, United States of America.

• United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966, December 16). International Covenant on Economic, Social & Cultural Rights (ICESCR). UN, New York, United States of America.

• Ugarkovic, B. (2004, Spring). A Comparative Study of Social and Economic Rights of Asylum Seekers a Kingdom. Ga J Int Comp Law, vol. 32 (2), 539-579.

• VluchtelingenWerk Nederland (Dutch Council for Refugees). Refugees in Numbers. VluchtelingenWerk Nederland. Website. Retrieved 22 June 2011 from: http://www.vluchtelingenwerk.nl/vluchtelingen/vluchtelingen-in-getallen.php

• VluchtelingenWerk Nederland. View point on medical care (Standpunt over Medische Zorg). VluchtelingenWerk Nederland. Website. Retrieved July 24, 2011.

• VluchtelingenWerkNederland. (2008, Februari). Introduction- Access target group to job market ( Introductie - Toegang doelgroep tot betaalde arbeidsmarkt). Retrieved September 1, 2009 from:

https://www.vluchtweb.nl/livelinkvw/livelink.exe?func=LL.getlogin&NextURL=%2Flivelinkvw%2Flivelink%2Eexe%2F

• VluchtelingenWerkNederland. (2008, December). Introduction- Access to short-term labor (Introductie – Toegang tot kortdurendwerk). Retrieved September 1, 2009 from:

https://www.vluchtweb.nl/livelinkvw/livelink.exe?func=LL.getlogin&NextURL=%2Flivelinkvw%2Flivelink%2Eexe%2F

• Zetter, R. (2007). More Labels, Fewer Refugees: Remaking the Refugee Label in an Era of Globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 20 (2), 172-192.