Healthy Aging in Place: Technology Utilization Among Older Adults in Khlong Mahasawat, Nakhon Pathom Province, Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research sought to explore the social support needs of older adults who age in place and their health-related technology utilization. A qualitative exploratory phenomenological approach framed the research. Twenty-one participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling in collaboration with health and community leaders from a sub-district hospital in Khlong Mahasawat, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. Data were collected using one-on-one interviews. All interviews were audio recorded, translated, and transcribed. Data were analyzed via content analysis matrices and interpreted using the phenomenological principles of intersubjectivity, internalization, and externalization. Sources of social support for using health-related technology by older adults who age in place included family members, community members, and health professionals. Data indicated the necessity for the social support of affordable digital devices, educational health-related social support, and customized social support for and by older adults. The heterogeneity of the older adult population who age in place, its increasing health concerns, and literacy levels require personalizing social support measures to promote further use of health-related technology. The limited use of health-related technology may be ameliorated by including stakeholders in creating customized social support programs, including older adults in policymaking regarding health-related technology creation and use, and including older adults in online scam education and prevention.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
• Alaimo, L. S., & Maggino, F. (2020). Sustainable development goals indicators at territorial level: Conceptual and methodological issues—The Italian perspective. Social Indicators Research, 147(2), 383–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02162-4
• Ahn, M., Kwon, H. J., & Kang, J. (2020). Supporting aging-in-place well: Findings from a cluster analysis of the reasons for aging-in-place and perceptions of well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(1), 3–15. https://doi.10.1177/0733464817748779
• Arthanat, S. (2021). Promoting information communication technology adoption and acceptance for aging-in-place: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(5), 471–480. https://doi.10.1177/0733464819891045
• Aulino, F. (2017). Narrating the future: Population aging and the demographic imaginary in Thailand. Medical Anthropology, 36(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1287181
• Beard, J. R., & Bloom, D. E. (2015). Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 658–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61461-6
• Betts, L. R., Hill, R., & Gardner, S. E. (2019). “There’s not enough knowledge out there”: Examining older adults’ perceptions of digital technology use and digital inclusion classes. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(8), 1147–1166. https://doi.10.1177/0733464817737621
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
• Connelly, K., Mokhtari, M., & Falk, T. H. (2014). Approaches to understanding the impact of technologies for aging in place: A mini-review. Gerontology, 60(3), 282–288. https://doi.10.1159/000355644
• Cotten, S. R. (2017). Examining the roles of technology in aging and quality of life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(5), 823–826. https://www.doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx109
• Damant, J., Knapp, M., Freddolino, P., & Lombard, D. (2017). Effects of digital engagement on the quality of life of older people. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(6), 1679–1703. https://doi.10.1111/hsc.12335
• Dawidowicz, A., Zysk, E., Figurska, M., Źróbek, S., & Kotnarowska, M. (2020). The methodology of identifying active aging places in the city - Practical application. Cities, 98, Article 102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102575
• Dreher, J. (2016). The social construction of power: Reflections beyond Berger/Luckmann and Bourdieu. Cultural Sociology, 10(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515615623
• Elers, P., Hunter, I., Whiddett, D., Lockhart, C., Guesgen, H., & Singh, A. (2018). User requirements for technology to assist aging in place: A qualitative study of older people and their informal support networks. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(6), Article e10741. https://doi:10.2196/10741
• Epps, F., Weeks, G., Graham, E., & Luster, D. (2018). Challenges to aging in place for African American older adults living with dementia and their families. Geriatric Nursing, 39(6), 646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.04.018
• Ethisan, P., Somrongthong, R., Ahmed, J., Kumar, R., & Chapman, R. S. (2017). Factors related to physical activity among the elderly population in rural Thailand. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 8(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916675899
• Fritz, R. L., & Dermody, G. (2019). A nurse-driven method for developing artificial intelligence in “smart” homes for aging-in-place. Nursing Outlook, 67(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2018.11.004
• Gauthier-Beaupré, A., Poitras, E., & Lévesque, M. (2024). Framework for policymaking on self-management of health by older adults using information and communication technologies. Health Research Policy and Systems, 22, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01119-5
• Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Marzilli, C. (2020). ‘New Normal’ in Covid-19 Era: A nursing perspective from Thailand. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(10), 1514–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.021
• Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
• Iancu, I., & Iancu, B. (2020). I love it, but it is too complicated. Aging adults’ perspective on mobile technology acceptance. ESSACHESS–Journal for Communication Studies, 13(2), 13–39. https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/494
• Jacobson, J., Lin, C. Z., & McEwen, R. (2017). Aging with technology: Seniors and mobile connections. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 331–357. http://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3221
• Ketphan, O., Juthamanee, S., Racal, S. J., & Bunpitaksakun, D. (2020). The mental health care model to support the community during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Belitung Nursing Journal, 6(5), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1193
• Kim, K. I., Gollamudi, S. S., & Steinhubl, S. (2017). Digital technology to enable aging in place. Experimental Gerontology, 88, 25–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.11.013
• Lazar, A., Thompson, H. J., Lin, S. Y., & Demiris, G. (2018). Negotiating relation work with telehealth home care companionship technologies that support aging in place. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), Article 103. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274372
• Lee, J. (2022). Urban-rural differences in intention to age in place while receiving home care services: Findings from the National Survey of Older Koreans. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 101, Article 104690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104690
• Lewis, C., & Buffel, T. (2020). Aging in place and the places of aging: A longitudinal study. Journal of Aging Studies, 54, Article 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100870
• Lim, S. S., Allen, K., Bhutta, Z. A., Dandona, L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Fullman, N., Gething, N., P. W. Goldberg, Hay, S. I., Holmberg M., & Chang, J. C. (2016). Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: A baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet, 388(10053), 1813–1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31467-2
• Lin, Y. Y., & Huang, C. S. (2016). Aging in Taiwan: Building a society for active aging and aging in place. The Gerontologist, 56(2), 176–183. https://doi:10.1093/geront/gnv107
• Lindquist, L. A., Muhammad, R., Miller-Winder, A. P., Opsasnick, L., Kim, K. Y., Benavente, J. Y., Wolf, M., & Ramirez-Zohfeld, V. (2021). Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 22, Article 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756
• Liu, L., Stroulia, E., Nikolaidis, I., Miguel-Cruz, A., & Rios Rincon, A. (2016). Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 91, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.007
• Lozano, R., Fullman, N., Abate, D., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., Abdel-Rahman, O., Abdi, A., Abdollahpour, A., Abdulkader, R. S., Abebe, N. D., Abebe, Z., Abejie, A. N., Abera, S. F., Abil, O. Z., ... & Beghi, E. (2018). Measuring progress from 1990 to 2017 and projecting attainment to 2030 of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals for 195 countries and territories: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 392(10159), 2091–2138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32281-5
• McConnell‐Henry, T., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2009). Husserl and Heidegger: Exploring the disparity. International journal of nursing practice, 15(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.01724.x
• McMurray, J., Strudwick, G., Forchuk, C., Morse, A., Lachance, J., Baskaran, A., Allison, L. & Booth, R. (2017). The importance of trust in the adoption and use of intelligent assistive technology by older adults to support aging in place: Scoping review protocol. JMIR Research Protocols, 6(11), Article e8772. https://doi:10.2196/resprot.8772
• Narushima, M., & Kawabata, M. (2020). “Fiercely independent”: Experiences of aging in the right place of older women living alone with physical limitations. Journal of Aging Studies, 54, Article 100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100875
• Nimrod, G. (2020). Aging well in the digital age: Technology in processes of selective optimization with compensation. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(9), 2008–2017. https://www.doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz111
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
• Park, S., & Ko, Y. (2020). The sociocultural meaning of “My Place”: Rural Korean elderly people's perspective of aging in place. Asian Nursing Research, 14(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.04.001
• Peek, S. T., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., Van Der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J. M. & Wouters, E. J. (2015). Older adults' reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology, 62(2), 226–237. https://doi.10.1159/000430949
• Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., Nieboer, M. E., Aarts, S., Van Der Voort, C. S., Rijnaard, M. D. & Wouters, E. J. M. (2019). Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: A dynamical framework. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), Article 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1241-9
• Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J., Luijkx, K. G., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2016). What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: Focus groups with stakeholders. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(5), Article e5253. https://doi:10.2196/jmir.5253
• Peters, M. A. (2009). Heidegger, phenomenology, education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00516.x
• Phulkerd, S., Thapsuwan, S., Chamratrithirong, A., & Gray, R. S. (2021). Influence of healthy lifestyle behaviors on life satisfaction in the aging population of Thailand: A national population-based survey. BMC Public Health, 21, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10032-9
• Popejoy, L., Zaniletti, I., Lane, K., Anderson, L., Miller, S., & Rantz, M. (2022). Longitudinal analysis of aging in place at TigerPlace: Resident function and well-being. Geriatric Nursing, 45(3), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.030
• Rahman, M. S. (2019). Health care in aged population: A global public health challenge. Journal of Medicine, 20(2), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.3329/jom.v20i2.42010
• Rodakowski, J., Mroz, T. M., Ciro, C., Lysack, C. L., Womack, J. L., Chippendale, T., Cutchin, M., Fritz, H., Fields, B., Schepens Niemec, S. L., Orellano Colon, E. M., Totenberg, S., Toto, P. E., Lee, D., Jewell, V. D., McDonald, M. V., Arthanat, S., Somerville, E., Park. M., & Piersol, C. V. (2021). Stimulating research to enhance aging in place. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 41(4), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492211022271
• Rosenwohl-Mack, A., Schumacher, K., Fang, M. L., & Fukuoka, Y. (2020). A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: Results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 103, Article 103496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103496
• Schorr, A. V., & Khalaila, R. (2018). Aging in place and quality of life among the elderly in Europe: A moderated mediation model. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 77, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.009
• Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults' ICT use: Aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3130
• Schulz, R., Wahl, H. W., Matthews, J. T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015). Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(5), 724–734. https://doi:10.1093/geront/gnu071
• Segre, S. (2016). Social constructionism as a sociological approach. Human Studies, 39(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9393-5
• Shpet, G. G. (2019). Hermeneutics and its problems. Springer International Publishing.
• Soubutts, E., Ayobi, A., Eardley, R., Cater, K., & O'Kane, A. A. (2021). Aging in place together: The journey towards adoption and acceptance of stairlifts in multi-resident homes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), Article 320. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476061
• Srithumsuk, W., & Wangnum, K. (2021). “New Normal” home chemotherapy in Thailand: How the challenging roles of nurses are changing? Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 8(3), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_54_20
• Sumner, J., Chong, L. S., Bundele, A., & Wei Lim, Y. (2021). Co-designing technology for aging in place: A systematic review. The Gerontologist, 61(7), e395–e409. https://doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa064
• Taipale, S., & Hänninen, R. (2018). More years, more technologies: Aging in the digital era. Human Technology, 14(3), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201811224833
• Thore, S. (2022). Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, Article 121204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121204
• Trinh-Shevrin, C., Nadkarni, S., Park, R., Islam, N., & Kwon, S. C. (2015). Defining an integrative approach for health promotion and disease prevention: A population health equity framework. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 26(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2015.0067
• Tsatsou, P. (2021). Aging: The two faces of Janus in digital inclusion? International Journal of Communication, 15, 1309–1329. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14220
• Tsertsidis, A., Kolkowska, E., & Hedström, K. (2019). Factors influencing seniors’ acceptance of technology for ageing in place in the post-implementation stage: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 129, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.027
• Tural, E., Lu, D., & Austin Cole, D. (2021). Safely and actively aging in place: Older adults’ attitudes and intentions toward smart home technologies. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 7. https://doi.10.1177/23337214211017340
• Urairak, B. (2022). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic related mental health on state anxiety in Thailand. Asian Administration & Management Review, 5(1), 1–6. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AAMR/article/view/254127
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
• Vanleerberghe, P., De Witte, N., Claes, C., Schalock, R. L., & Verté, D. (2017). The quality of life of older people aging in place: A literature review. Quality of Life Research, 26(11), 2899–2907. https://doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1651-0
• Vanleerberghe, P., De Witte, N., Claes, C., & Verte, D. (2019). The association between frailty and quality of life when aging in place. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 85, Article 103915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103915
• Versey, H. S. (2021). Perceptions of community among suburban and urban-dwelling adults aging in place. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, Article 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100969
• Wang, J., Du, Y., Coleman, D., Peck, M., Myneni, S., Kang, H., & Gong, Y. (2019). Mobile and connected health technology needs for older adults aging in place: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Aging, 2(1), Article e13864. https://doi:10.2196/13864
• Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098
• Wilson-Menzfeld, G., Gates, J., Vijaykumar, S., & Morgan, D. (2023). Understanding older adults’ use of social technology and the factors influencing use. Ageing & Society, 43(1), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000490
• Wojnar, D. M., & Swanson, K. M. (2007). Phenomenology: An exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010106295172
• Yorsaeng, R., Suntronwong, N., Thongpan, I., Chuchaona, W., Lestari, F. B., Pasittungkul, S., Puenpa, J., Atsawawaranunt, A., Sharma, C., Sudhinaraset, N., Mungaomklang, A., Kitphati, R., Wanlapokorn, N. & Poovorawan, Y. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 and control measures on public health in Thailand, 2020. PeerJ, 10, Article e12960. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12960
• Zhang, F., Chan, A. P., Darko, A., & Li, D. (2021). BIM-enabled multi-level assessment of age-friendliness of urban housing based on multiscale spatial framework: Enlightenments of housing support for “aging-in-place.” Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, Article 103039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103039
• Zinszer, K., Tamblyn, R., Bates, D. W., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2013). A qualitative study of health information technology in the Canadian public health system. BMC Public Health, 13(1), Article 509. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/509