The Dimensions of Attitude and Their Attributes with Regard to Youths’ Attitudes Towards Agriculture as a Profession

Main Article Content

Rungroge Kamondetdacha


This study aimed to identify the dimensions of attitude attributing to the young generation’s attitude towards agriculture as a profession. This study adopted an exploratory approach using a case study survey method to collect data that were subsequently analyzed using a content analysis technique. The sample encompassed fifty-two undergraduate students, who were descendants of farmers, and who were enrolled in the Bachelor of Arts in Agricultural Resources Administration program at Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. The results revealed four dimensions of attitude towards agriculture as a profession: 1) professional recognition, 2) financial benefit, 3) professional practice, and 4) quality of life. The results demonstrated that when a response contained only one dimension, the professional recognition dimension was always presented as a favorable attitude. Furthermore, when two or more dimensions were referred to in a response, the response that included the professional recognition dimension made the statement of unfavorable or negative attitudes towards agriculture as a profession softened or toned down. In terms of policy implications, organizations in charge of supporting the young generation in pursuing a career in agriculture should focus on strengthening public recognition of agriculture as one of the most respectable professions, since the professional recognition dimension is arguably attributing to positive attitudes.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamondetdacha, R. (2021). The Dimensions of Attitude and Their Attributes with Regard to Youths’ Attitudes Towards Agriculture as a Profession. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 29(-), 435 - 449. Retrieved from
Author Biography

Rungroge Kamondetdacha, School of Agricultural Resources, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Corresponding author


• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Open University Press.
• Ayanda, I. F., Olooto, F., Motunrayo, A., Abolaji, G. T., Yusuf, O. J., & Subair, S. K. (2012). Perception of Kwara state university agricultural students on farming as means of future livelihood. International Journal of AgriScience, 2(11), 1053-1061.
• Bello, A. R. S., Allajabou, H. A., & Baig, M. B. (2015). Attitudes of rural youth towards agriculture as an occupation: A case study from Sudan. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 4 (4), 415-424.
• Chmiliar, L. (2010). Case study surveys. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 125-126). SAGE Publications, Inc.,
• Chulalongkorn University. (2021, February 2). School of agricultural resources.
• Department of Agricultural Extension. (2016a). The population in Thailand’s agriculture sector 2011-2015.
• Department of Agricultural Extension. (2016b). ฐานข้อมูลทะเบียนเกษตรกร ณ วันที่ 29 กุมภาพันธ์ 2559 [Database of Thailand’s agriculture population in February 2016].ทะเบียนเกษตรกร-24-11-edit.pdf
• Department of Agricultural Extension. (2017). Young smart farmer future and direction of Thai agricultural sector.
• Faysse, N., Phiboon, K., & Filloux, T. (2019). Public policy to support young farmers in Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(4), 292-299.
• Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why attitudes are important: Defining attitude and attitude theory 20 years later. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 429–440). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Krajangchom, S., Auttarat, S., Srinurak, N., & Yasai, U. (2016). ปัจจัยที่สัมพันธ์กับแรงจูงใจของทายาทเกษตรกรในการสานต่ออาชีพเกษตรในอ าเภอสันป่าตอง จังหวัดเชียงใหม่ [Factors related to the motivation of farmer’s descendants on agricultural inheritance in Sanpatong District Chiang Mai Province]. Journal of Agriculture, 32(1), 29-38.
• May, D., Arancibia, S., Behrendt, K., & Adams, J. (2019). Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm: Investigating the effectiveness of the young farmer payment using a behavioural approach. Land Use Policy, 82, 317-327.
• National Economic and Social Development Board. (2011). eleventh national economic and social development plan (2012-2016).
• Office of Agricultural Economics. (2017). เศรษฐกิจการเกษตรของประเทศไทย [Indicators of Thailand’s agricultural economics].
• Phiboon, K., Cochetel, C., & Faysse, N. (2019). Support programmes and the diversity of young farmers in Thailand: A good match? Outlook on Agriculture, 48(4), 300-308.
• Rayasawath, C. (2018). Factors affecting the household succession in agricultural occupation in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Agriculture, 8(7), 109.
• Ruiz Salvago, M., Phiboon, K., Faysse, N., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2019). Young people’s willingness to farm under present and improved conditions in Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(4), 282-291.
• Shenaifi, M. S. (2013). Attitudes of students at college of food and agricultural sciences toward agriculture. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 12, 117-120.
• Shireesha, K., Satyagopal, P. V., Lakshmi, T., Ravindrareddy, B., & Prasad, S. V. (2016). Attitude of youth towards farming – A critical analysis. Advances in Life Sciences, 5(18), 7935-7940.
• Sumberg, J., Yeboah, T., Flynn, J., & Anyidoho, N. A. (2017). Young people’s perspectives on farming in Ghana: a Q study. Food Security, 9, 151-161.
• Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. John Wiley & Sons.
• Visetnoi, S., & Sirisoponsilp, S. (2019). Uplifting Thailand’s agriculture through agricultural education: a paradigm shift for future farmers. International Journal of Agriculture Innovation, Technology, and Globalisation, 1(1), 44-56.
• World Bank (2021). Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP).