Do Religious People Have More Children? The Effect of Religious Affiliation and Religiosity on Fertility

Main Article Content

Iim Halimatusa'diyah
Dzuriyatun Toyibah

Abstract

This paper aimed to examine the effect of religious affiliation and religiosity on the fertility rate. While scholars have predicted the decline of religion’s influence, practice, and role in modern societies, religion still plays a vital role in shaping individuals’ behavior, including their fertility behavior. While there have been many studies on the role of religion on fertility, few studies have compared the fertility rates among people from different religious affiliations and their practices of religiosity. Additionally, cross-national analyses of the fertility rate of religious individuals who live as a majority or minority in various countries are still limited. Drawing from the World Value Survey data and using OLS regression to examine interaction and socialization, and minority-status approaches to the relationship between religion and fertility behaviors, this study revealed that Muslims are more likely to have a higher number of children among the explored religions. In terms of religiosity, those who are more religious, from all religious affiliations, demonstrated the same likelihood of having high fertility. Additionally, while both ritual and belief dimensions of religiosity are significantly associated with a high fertility rate for all religious affiliations, all dimensions of religiosity had significant effects on fertility for Muslims. Furthermore, Muslim and Christian minorities were likely to have lower fertility rates than their counterparts with majority status.

Article Details

How to Cite
Halimatusa’diyah, I., & Toyibah, D. (2021). Do Religious People Have More Children? The Effect of Religious Affiliation and Religiosity on Fertility. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 29(-), 479–499. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/243019
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Iim Halimatusa'diyah, Department of Sociology, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University (UIN) Jakarta, Indonesia

Corresponding author

References

• Agadjanian, V. (2001). Religion, social milieu, and the contraceptive revolution. Population Studies, 55(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720127691

• Alagarajan, M., & Kulkarni, P. M. (2008). Religious differentials in fertility in India: Is there a convergence? Economic and Political Weekly, 43(48), 44–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40278236

• Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088919

• Bakhshizadeh, M. (2018). Changing gender norms in Islam between reason and revelation. Varlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xnfv0

• Barber, J. S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090128

• Baudin, T. (2015). Religion and fertility: The French connection. Demographic Research, 32, 397–420. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.13

• Berghammer, C. (2012). Church attendance and childbearing: Evidence from a Dutch panel study, 1987-2005. Population Studies, 66(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.655304

• Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. John Wiley & Sons.

• Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford University Press.

• Caldwell, B., & Barkat-e-Khuda. (2000). The first generation to control family size: A microstudy of the causes of fertility decline in a rural area of Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 31(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00239.x

• Caldwell, J. C. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 171–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973108

• Casterline, J. B., Sathar, Z. A., & ul Haque., M. (2001). Obstacles to contraceptive use in Pakistan: A study in Punjab. Studies in Family Planning, 32(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00095.x

• Corijn, M., & Klijzing, E. (Eds.). (2001). Transitions to adulthood in Europe. Springer Publishing.

• Dilmaghani, M. (2019). Religiosity, secularity and fertility in Canada. European Journal of Population, 35(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9487-z

• Dribe, M., Oris, M., & Pozzi, L. (2014). Socioeconomic status and fertility before, during, and after the demographic transition: An introduction. Demographic Research, 31, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.7

• Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population, 24, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-007-9121-y

• Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally and Company.

• Goldscheider, C. (2006). Religion, family, and fertility: What do we know historically and comparatively? In R. Derosas & F. van Poppel (Eds.), Religion and the Decline of Fertility in the Western World (pp. 41–57). Springer.

• Goldscheider, C., & Uhlenberg, P. R. (1969). Minority group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology, 74(4), 361–372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776057

• Graham, G. (1992). Religion, Secularization and Modernity. Philosophy, 67(260), 183–197. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3751450

• Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitude toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspective, 53(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179

• Hassouneh-Phillips, D. S. (2001). “Marriage is half of faith and the rest is fear Allah” marriage and spousal abuse among American Muslims. Violence Against Women, 7(8), 927–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182839

• Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000

• Heaton, T. B. (2011). Does religion influence fertility in developing countries. Population Research and Policy Review, 30, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9196-8

• Hindin, M. J. (2000). Women’s autonomy, women’s status and fertility-related behavior in Zimbabwe. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026590717779

• Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen, B. (Eds.). (2018). World Values Survey: Round Six-country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.8

• Jones, R. K., & Brayfield., A. (1997). Life’s greatest joy? European attitudes toward the centrality of children. Social Forces, 75(4), 1239–1269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580670

• Kabeer, N. (2001). Ideas, economics and ‘the sociology of supply’: Explanations for fertility decline in Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies, 38(1), 29–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322181

• Kaufmann, E. (2009). Islamism, religiosity and fertility in the Muslim world. ISA Conference. https://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Islamismfertilitypaper.pdf

• Kaufmann, E., Goujon, A., & Skirbekk, V. (2012). The end of secularization in Europe? A socio-demographic perspective. Sociology of Religion, 73(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srr033

• Knodel, J., Gray, R. S., Sriwatcharin, P., & Peracca, S. (1999). Religion and reproduction: Muslims in Buddhist Thailand. Population Studies, 53(2), 149–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2584673

• LeGrand, T., Koppenhaver, T., Mondain, N., & Randall, S. (2003). Reassessing the insurance effect: A qualitative analysis of fertility behavior in Senegal and Zimbabwe. Population and Development Review, 29(3), 375–403. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3115279

• Lehrer, E. L. (2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 707–726. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3657335

• Lipka, M., & Hackett, C. (2017, April 6). Why Muslims are the world’s fastest-growing religious group. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/

• McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x

• Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2010). The Implications of marital instability for a women’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy. Demographic Research, 23, 963–996. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.34

• Miettinen, A., Gietel-Basten, S., & Rotkirch, A. (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24, 469–496. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20

• Mills, M. (2010). Gender roles, gender (in)equality and fertility: An empirical test of five gender equity indices. Canadian Studies in Population, 37(3–4), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.25336/P6131Q

• Mills, M., Begall, K., Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.1

• Morgan, S. P., Stash, S., Smith, H. L., & Mason, K. O. (2002a). Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00515.x

• Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? European Journal of Population, 29, 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7

• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

• Pagnini, D. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (1993). The divorce of marriage and childbearing: Changing attitudes and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 19(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938442

• Pew Research Center. (2011, January 27). Main Factors Driving Population Growth. The Future of the Global Muslim Population. https://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/future-of-the-global-muslim-population-main-factors/#fertility

• Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960-1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/353333

• Rahman, M. (1998). The effect of child mortality on fertility regulation in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 29(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/172273

• Rosina, A., & Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research, 11, 149–172. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.11.6

• Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/353890

• Schultz, T. P. (1994). Marital status and fertility in the United States: Welfare and labor market effects. Journal of Human Resources, 29(2), 637–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/146114

• Shomali, M. A. (2008). Islamic bioethics: A general scheme. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 1(1), 1–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713653/

• Shulgin, S., Zinkina, J., & Korotayev, A. (2019). Religiosity and aging: Age and cohort effects and their implications for the future of religious values in high-income OECD countries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58(3), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12613

• Siddiqui, R. (1996). The impact of socioeconomic factors on fertility behaviour: A cross-country analysis. Pakistan Development Review, 35(2), 107–128. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12321254/

• Simons, J. (2003). Religions, population: Doctrines of. In P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Population (1st ed., pp. 830-835). Macmillan Reference USA.

• Stolzenberg, R. M., Blair-Loy, M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Religious participation in early adulthood: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096347

• Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research, 3, 45–86. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3

• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

• Tazi-Preve, I., Bichlbauer, D., & Goujon, A. (2004). Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, 40, 5–24. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/7089

• Westoff, C. F., & Frejka, T. (2007). Religiousness and fertility among European Muslims. Population and Development Review, 33(4), 785–809. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25487622

• Xie, Y., & Pimentel, E. E. (1992). Age patterns of marital fertility: Revising the Coale–Trussell method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290634

• Zhang, L. (2008). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and male and female fertility. Demographic Research, 118, 233–262. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.8

• Zimmer, Z., Rojo, F., Ofstedal, M. B., Chiu, C. T., Saito, Y., & Jagger, C. (2019). Religiosity and health: A global comparative study. SSM - Population Health, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.11.006