The Hijrah Communities and Religious Superficiality: Ideology and Religiosity of the Islamic Hijrah Communities on Social Media

Main Article Content

Rahmad Hidayat
Muhammad Sholihin
Deri Wanto


The Hijrah communities in Indonesia are a complex and paradoxical phenomenon. These communities can be identified by how its members express religious attitudes on social media, especially Facebook. This position on social media affects the members’ religious and ideological merits in the Hijrah communities. This research applied a netnographic approach concerned with understanding how Hijrah community Facebook groups express their religiosity in texts, status, and images. The data sources were the members of Hijrah community Facebook groups in Indonesia. Through a qualitative approach with a netnographic design, this research succeeded in discovering a new hypothesis that ‘Facebook is one of the authoritative sources as well as Instagram, Twitter, WhatsApp, and offline meetings in improving religious knowledge by the Hijrah communities.’ This social media presence encouraged religious superficiality. In terms of ideology, the Hijrah communities showed ideological hybridity. In this case, exposed from various societies and streams received from populist Islamic scholarly authorities, religious attitudes virtually agreed upon by Hijrah communities were mixed.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hidayat, R., Sholihin, M., & Deri Wanto. (2020). The Hijrah Communities and Religious Superficiality: Ideology and Religiosity of the Islamic Hijrah Communities on Social Media. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 29(-), 118–138. Retrieved from
Research Articles
Author Biography

Muhammad Sholihin, IAIN Curup, Indonesia

Corresponding author


• Abdel-Fadil, M. (2017). Identity politics in a mediatized religious environment on Facebook: Yes to wearing the cross whenever and wherever I choose. Journal of Religion in Europe, 10(4), 457–486.

• Abdel-Fadil, M. (2018). Nationalizing Christianity and hijacking religion on Facebook. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Contesting Religion (pp. 97–116). De Gruyter.

• Abdel-Fadil, M. (2019). The politics of affect: The glue of religious and identity conflicts in social media. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(1), 11–34.

• Alao, A. O., Soderberg, M., Pohl, E. L., & Alao, A. L. (2006). Cybersuicide: Review of the role of the internet on suicide. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 489-493.

• Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

• Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998-2009. Applied Linguists, 34(3), 255–278.

• Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., & Emerson, C. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

• Barker, C. (2002). Cultural studies, theory, and practice. Sage Publications.

• Barnett, W. A., Hinich, M. J., & Schofield, N. (1993). Political economy: Institutions, competition, and representation. Cambridge University Press.

• Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. Fontana Press.

• Bedu, H., Katip, K., Sahid, M., & Mansor, S. M. (2008). Keruntuhan Akhlak dan Gejala Sosial dalam Keluarga: Isu dan Cabaran.

• Benke, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Remembering and forgetting: The discursive construction of generational memories. In M. Dedaic & D. Nelson (Eds.), At War with Words. Mouton de Gruyter.

• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

• Bruce, T. (2018). New technologies, continuing ideologies: Online reader comments as a support for media perspectives of minority religions. Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 53-75.

• Carter, P. (2015). Virtual ethnography: Placing emotional geographies via YouTube. In S. P. Hanna, A. E. Potter, E. A. Modlin, P. Carter, & D. L. Butler (Eds.), Social Memory and Heritage Tourism Methodologies (pp. 48–67). Routledge.

• Castells, M. (2009). Rise of network society with new preface. Wiley-Blackwell.

• Chitwood, K. (2019). Latinx Muslims “like” one another: An ethnographic exploration of social media and the formation of Latinx Muslim community. In Fewkes, J. (Ed.) Anthropological Perspectives on the Religious Uses of Mobile Apps (pp. 83–102). Palgrave McMillan.

• Colas, D., & Jacobs, A. (1997). Civil society and fanaticism: Conjoined histories (Mestizo Spaces / Espaces Métissés) (1st ed.). Stanford University Press.

• Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of marx the state of the debt, the work of mourning & the new international. Routledge.

• Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology. Longman.

• Fealy, G., & White, S. (2008). Expressing Islam: Religious life and politics in Indonesia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

• Franedya, R. (2019, May 16). Survei: Pengguna Internet di RI Tembus 171,17 Juta Jiwa. CNBC Indonesia.

• Gbadegesin, V. O., & Onanuga, P. A. (2018). The enactment of ideology and self-presentation in political campaign videos of the 2015 general election in Nigeria. Discourse, Context & Media, 28, 121-130.

• Habibi. M. (2011). Memahami ACFTA dari Perspektif Masyarakat Jaringan. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 2(1), 99-149.

• Hall, S. (1997). Chapter 1: The work of representation. In Hall, S. (Ed.), Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 15-64). Sage Publication.

• Harmon, C. C. (2005). Fanaticism and guerrilla warfare in the late twentieth century. In M. Hughes & G. Johnson (Eds.), Fanaticism and Conflict in the Modern Age (pp. 101–115). Routledge.

• Haryanto, A. T. (2020, February 20). Riset: Ada 175,2 Juta Pengguna Internet di Indonesia. Detikinet.

• Heer, J., Manoschek, W., Pollak, A., & Wodak, R. (2003). Wie Geschichte gemacht wird: Zur Konstruktion von Erinnerung an Wehrmacht und Zweiten Weltkrieg [How history is made: on the construction of memories of the Wehrmacht and the Second World War]. Czernin Verlags GmbH.

• Kgatle, M. S. (2018). Social media and religion: Missiological perspective on the link between Facebook and the emergence of prophetic churches in southern Africa. Verbum et Ecclesia, 39(1), 1–6.

• Khosyatillah, A. (2018). Dampak Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Keagamaan (Studi Kasus 7 Mahasiswa Jurusan Studi Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya). [Unpublished masters thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Surabaya.

• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.

• Kinne, B. (1943). Voltaire never said it! Modern Language Notes, 58(7), 534-535.

• Kleis, R., Torpats, Ü., Gross, L., & Freymann, H. (1986). Ladina-eesti sõnaraamat. Valgus.

• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage Publications.

• Lassen, I., Strunck, J., & Vestergaard, T. (2006). Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (Discourse approaches to politics, society, and culture). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent internet use. Current Psychology, 27, 217–233.

• Lillqvist, E., Louhiala-Salminen, L., & Kankaanranta, A. (2016). Power relations in social media discourse: Dialogization and monologization on corporate Facebook pages. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 68–76.

• Marimaa, K. (2011). The many faces of fanaticism. ENDC Proceeding No. 14, 29–55.

• Markus. (2014, February 7). Membaca Demografi Agama-agama di Indonesia. Persekutuan Gereja-Gereja Di Indonesia (PGI).

• Martin, J. L. (2015). What is ideology? Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas, 77(1), 9–32.

• Misbah, A. (2019). Fun and religious authority: Socializing anti-music on Instagram. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, 21(2), 149–168.

• Mitchell, W. J. T. (1987). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. University of Chicago Press.

• Mustafa, M. Z., Ghani, Z. A., Zumrah, A. R., Ramly, R. M., Azdi, W. M. F., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2013). Facebook as social media tools among Muslim youths in Malaysia. American International Journal of Social Science, 2(8), 173–177.

• Nazmudin, N. (2018). Kerukunan dan Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama dalam Membangun Keutuhan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (NKRI). Journal of Government and Civil Society, 1(1), 23-39.

• Nisa, E. F. (2018). Social media and the birth of an Islamic social movement: ODOJ (One Day One Juz) in contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 24–43.

• Nisa, Y. F., Hendarmin, L. A., Lubis, D. A., Syafruddin, D., & Ropi, I. (2018). Gen Z: kegalauan identitas keagamaa. Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM), UIN Jakarta.

• Nopriyansa, E. (2019). Islamic perspective on Syaifudin Ibrahim’spriester (Analysis of the views, assumptions, and challenges of the reverend Syaifuddin Ibrahim against Muslims). Ilmu Ushuluddin, 6(1), 23-32.

• North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Norton.

• Rahman, T., Nurnisya, F. Y., Nurjannah, A., & Lailia Hifziati. (2018). Hijrah and the articulation of Islamic identity of Indonesia millenials using the instagram. Yogyakarta.

• Rink, A., & Sharma, K. (2018). The determinants of religious radicalization: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1229–1261.

• Risdiana, A., & Ramadhan, R. B. (2019). Dakwah Virtual sebagai Banalitas Keberagamaan di Era Disrupsi. Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 7(1), 133-154.

• Rohmatika, R. V., & Hakiki, K. M. (2018). Fanatisme Beragama Yes, Ekstrimisme Beragama No: Upaya Meneguhkan Harmoni Beragama Dalam Perspektif Kristen. Al-Adyan, 13(1), 1–24.

• Rumadi, R. (2012). Islam Dan Otoritas Keagamaan. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 20(1), 25-54.

• Salleh, M. S. (2012). Religiosity in development: A theoretical construct of an Islamic-based development. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(14), 266-274.

• Sharp, R. (2018). Knowledge, ideology and the politics of schooling: Towards a Marxist analysis of education. Routledge.

• Sirait, S. (2016). Moderate Muslim: Mapping the ideology of mass Islamic organizations in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 4(1), 115-126.

• Skågeby, J. (2011). Online ethnographic methods: Towards a qualitative understanding of virtual community practices. In Daniel, B. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena (pp. 410-428). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-040-2.ch025

• Sularso, C. E. W.. (2019). Konflik Agama di Indonesia.

• Sunesti, Y., Hasan, N., & Azca, M. N. (2018). Young Salafi-niqabi and Hijrah: Agency and identity negotiation. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 8(2), 173-198.

• Sutopo, O. R. (2010). Beragam Islam, Beragam Ekspresi: Islam Indonesia dalam Praktik. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 15(2), 85-97.

• Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2016). Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. Discourse, Context, and Media, 13(B), 132-142.

• van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage Publications.

• Verschoor-Kirss, A. (2012). Even Satan gets likes on Facebook: The dynamic interplay of religion and technology in online social networks. Journal of Religion & Society, 14, 1-12.

• Wilson, A. (2012). What is a text? Studies in history and philosophy of science part A, 43(2), 341-358.

• Wolf, M., Sims, J., & Yang, H. (2018). Social media? What social media? UK academy for information systems conference proceedings 2018.

• Yahaya, A., & Buang, R. (2010). Punca Berlakunya Masalah Gejala Gengsterisme Di Kalangan Remaja di Beberapa Buah Sekolah Menengah Empat Negeri, 1-12. (Unpublished).

• Zulhazmi, A. Z., & Hastuti, D. A. S. (2018). Da’wa, Muslim millennials, and social media. Lentera, 2(2), 139–156.