Formation of Traditional Gender Attitudes among Young Married Women in Rural North Dinajpur, West Bengal: Does Religion Play A Role?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Despite the prevalence of gender inequality in developing countries like India, little attention has been paid on the process of gender norm acquisition among its population. This study thus, addresses the gap by exploring formation of gender attitude among women (specifically about their appropriate roles and their rights as well as legitimacy of domestic violence) taking religious affiliation and other possible determinants into account. Data was obtained and analyzed from a population-based survey among 500 young married women (18-30 years), Hindu and Muslim, in rural North-Dinajpur district of West Bengal, India. The results indicated a fairly patriarchal view of gender relations whereby respondents supported traditional division of roles between men and women, inequitable attitude towards girls and justified wife beating on various grounds irrespective of religious affiliation. However, the Muslim women had somewhat more non-egalitarian attitude. We found that higher autonomy among the respondents’ mothers (decision making and mobility) led to more egalitarian gender attitude whereas adverse experiences like witnessing parental violence during childhood led to more traditional attitude. Indicators of women’s empowerment such as higher age at marriage, higher education, mass media exposure and engagement in income generating activities were pacifiers in the development of non-egalitarian gender attitudes. Policy implications of the findings are also presented and discussed.
Article Details
References
• Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New York City. Retrieved from http://www.jku.at/org/content/e54521/e54528/e54529/e178059/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory_ger.pdf.
• Basu, A.M. (2004). The squabble that never ends: Religion and fertility. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(39), 4294-4296.
• Basu, A.M., & Amin, S. (2000). Conditioning factors for fertility decline in Bengal: History, language, identity, and openness to innovation. Population and Development Review, 26(4), 761-793.
• Bartowski, J.P., & Read, J.G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender, power and identity among Evangelical and Muslim women in the United States. Qualitative Sociology, 26(1), 71-92.
• Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540.
• Bhat, P.N.M., & Rajan, S.I. (1990). Demographic transition in Kerala revisited. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(35), 1957-1980.
• Bhat, P.N.M., & Zavier, A.J.F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography, 40(4), 637-657.
• Booth‚ A., & Amato‚ P. (1994). Parental gender role non-traditionalism and offspring outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family‚ 56‚ 865-877.
• Borooah, V.K., & Iyer, S. (2005). Religion, literacy and the female-to-male ratio. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(5), 419-427.
• Boyd, C.J. (1989). Mothers and daughters: A discussion of theory and research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(2), 291-301.
• Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural Myths and Supports for Rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.
• Carines, T.G.M.E., & Janssens, J.M.A.M. (1998). Maternal influences on daughter’s gender role attitudes. Sex Roles, 38(314), 171-186.
• Carlson, G.J., Kordas, K., & Murray-Kolb, L.E. (2014). Associations between women’s autonomy and child nutritional status: A review of literature. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 11(4), 1-31.
• Chakravarti, U. (1993). Conceptualizing brahmanical patriarchy in early India: Gender, caste, class and state. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(11), 579-585.
• Chattopadhyay, A., & Goswami, B. (2006). Status of women in two Bengals: Evidence from large scale surveys. Journal of Biosocial Science, 39, 267-286.
• Deininger, K., Goyal, A., & Nagarajan, H. (2013). Women’s inheritance rights and intergenerational transmission of resources in India. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 114–141.
• Das, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Women’s status in West Bengal and Bangladesh: A cross country analysis. Demography India, 41(1 & 2), 83-102.
• Desai, S., & Temsah, G. (2014). Muslim and Hindu women’s public and private behaviors: Gender, family and communalized politics in India. Demography, 51(6), 2307–2332. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0319-4
• Dhar, D., Jain, T., & Jayachandran, S. (2015). Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Attitudes: Evidence from India (No. w21429). National Bureau of Economic Research. Doi: 10.3386/W21429
• Dobash, R.E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
• Dunn, M.S. (1960). Marriage role expectations of adolescents. Marriage and Family Living, 22(2), 99-111.
• Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35–60.
• Finseraas, H., Johnsen, Å.A., Kotsadam, A., & Torsvik, G. (2015). Exposure to female colleagues breaks the glass ceiling - Evidence from a combined vignette and field experiment, CESifo Working Paper, No. 5565. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/123205/1/cesifo_wp5565.pdf
• Gangadharan, L., Jain, T., Maitra, P., & Vecci, J. (2016). Social identity and governance: The behavioral response to female leaders. European Economic Review, 90, 302-325.
• Glass, J., Bengtson, V., & Dunham, C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review, 51(5), 685–698.
• Government of India (2006). Assistance to backward districts under Rashtriya Sam Vikas Yojana. Ministry of Panchayati Raj, GOI. Retrieved from www.panchayat.gov.in/documents/10198/1136810/USQ%10NO.2482%
• 20Dated%2014.12.06.pdf
• Haj-Yahia, M.M. (1998). Beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian women: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Violence against Women, 4(5), 533-558.
• Haj-Yahia, M.M. (2003). Beliefs about wife beating among Arab men from Israel: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Journal of Family Violence, 18(4), 193-206.
• Hotaling, G.T., & Sugarman, D.B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101-124.
• International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–2006: India: Volume II. Mumbai: IIPS.
• Jain, T. (2014). Where there is a will: Fertility behavior and sex bias in large families. Journal of Human Resources, 49(2), 393–423.
• Jayachandran, S. (2015). The root causes of gender inequality in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 7, 63–88.
• Jejeebhoy, S.J. (1998). Wife beating in rural India: A husband’s right? Evidence from survey data. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(15), 855-862.
• Jejeebhoy, S.J. (2002). Convergence and divergence in spouses’ perspectives on women’s autonomy in rural India. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 299–308. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2002.00299.x.
• Jejeebhoy, S.J., & Sathar, Z.A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: the influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.
• Kalmauss, D.S., & Straus, M.A. (1984). The intergenerational transmission of marital aggression. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 11-19.
• Krishnaraj, M. (1991). ‘Women and violence – A Country report: A study sponsored by UNESCO’, Research Centre for Women’s Studies, SNDT Women’s University, Bombay (ed).
• Kulik, L. (2002). Like-sex versus opposite-sex effects in transmission of gender role ideology from parents to adolescents in Israel. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6), 451–457.
• Kulkarni, P.M., & Alagrajan, M. (2005). Population growth, fertility, and religion in India. Economic and Political weekly, 40(5), 403-410.
• Mensch, B.S., Ibrahim, B.L., Lee, S.M., & el-Gibaly, O. (2003). Gender-role attitudes among Egyptian adolescents. Studies in family planning, 34(1), 8-18.
• Moen, P., Erickson, M.A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their mother's daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(2), 281-293.
• Morgan S.P., Sharon, S., Smith, H.L., & Mason, K.O. (2002). Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537.
• Psacharopoulos, G., & Tzannatos, Z. (1989). Female labor force participation: An international perspective. World Bank Research Observer, 4(2), 187–201.
• Read, J.G. (2003). The sources of gender role attitudes among Christian and Muslim Arab-American women. Sociology of Religion, 64(2), 207-222.
• Roy, T.K., & Niranjan, S. (2004). Indicators of women’s empowerment in India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 19(3), 23-38.
• Saunders, D.G., Lynch, A.B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2(1), 39-57.
• Seguino, S. (2011). Help or hindrance? Religion’s impact on gender inequality in attitudes and outcomes. World Development, 39(8), 1308 – 1321.
• Sherkat, D.E. (2000). That they be keepers of the home: The effect of conservative religion on early and late transitions into housewifery. Review of Religious Research, 41(3), 344-358.
• Spitze‚ G. (1988). Women’s employment and family relations: A review. Journal of Marriage and the Family‚ 50‚ 595-618.
• Tharakan, S.M., & Tharakan, M. (1975). Status of Women in India: A Historical Perspective. Social Scientist, 4(4/5), Special Number on Women, 115-123.
• Thornton, A., Alwin, D., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 211–227.
• Visaria, L. (2008). Violence against women in India: Is empowerment a protective factor? Economic and Political Weekly, 43(48), 60-66.
• Witt, S.D. (1997). Parental influence on children's socialization to gender roles. Adolescence, 32(126), 253-259.
• Zakar, R., Zakar, M.Z., & Kraemer, A. (2013). Men’s beliefs and attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in Pakistan. Violence against Women, 19(2), 246–268.