Environmental Politics in Thailand: An Analysis of the Policies of the Pheu Thai Party and the Move Forward Party in the 2023 Elections

Main Article Content

Ladawan Khaikham

Abstract

This study examines the role of political parties in shaping environmental policy in Thailand, focusing specifically on the Pheu Thai Party and the Move Forward Party during the 2023 general elections. The research analyzes how these parties integrate environmental concerns into their political agendas and how their policy approaches align with broader sustainable development goals. Using a qualitative research methodology, the study applies content and thematic analysis to data collected from campaign materials, official policy statements, and media coverage. The findings indicate that political parties play a crucial role in driving environmental policies, with the Pheu Thai Party primarily emphasizing economic development and rural welfare, while the Move Forward Party prioritizes comprehensive environmental reforms and grassroots activism. However, the study also identifies key challenges, including political instability, corruption, and conflicting interests, which hinder effective policy implementation. The findings highlight a need for clearer policy articulation, stronger democratic engagement, and stronger enforcement mechanisms to achieve meaningful environmental outcomes in Thailand's evolving political landscape. The 2023 elections represent a critical juncture for environmental policy development, providing an opportunity for political parties to present sustainable policy visions and promote community participation in environmental conservation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khaikham, L. (2026). Environmental Politics in Thailand: An Analysis of the Policies of the Pheu Thai Party and the Move Forward Party in the 2023 Elections. Journal of Politics and Governance, 16(1), 45–60. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jopag/article/view/285461
Section
Research Articles

References

Akarapongpisak, N. (2022). Chak “thonon” su “sapha”: Kan-tang phak samanchon lae kan-long samak rub luek-tang khong NGO lae nak kit-ta-kam nai phak ana-khot mai [From “streets” to “parliament”: The formation of the Commoner Party and the election campaigns of NGOs and activists in the Future Forward Party]. Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University, 18(2), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.14456/jssnu.2022.11

Apostoaie, M. (2016). Relevant determinants of the political parties’ environmental preference. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 63, 163–176. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/saeb-2016-0135

Asplund, E., Prieto, N. G., & Lindemann, C. (2023). Reducing the environmental impact of elections: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific. International IDEA. https://www.idea.int/news/reducing-environmental-impact-elections-lessons-asia-pacific

Baker, C., & Phongpaichit, P. (2022). A history of Thailand. Cambridge University Press.

Bangkok Tribune. (2024, May 22). Policy brief: Environmental policies and challenges in the new politics. https://bkktribune.com/policy-brief-environmental-policies-and-challenges-in-the-new-politics/

Boly, M., Combes, J.-L., & Combes Motel, P. (2023). Does environment pay for politicians? Economic Modelling, 128, Article 106491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106491

Boonsod, S. (2019). Bot-bat khong nak kot-mai thai kap kan rat-tha-pha-ran pheua nam ma su rabop pha-det-kan: Suksa korani rat-tha-pha-ran 22 phruetsapha 2557 [The role of Thai lawyers in coups leading to dictatorship: A case study of the May 22, 2014 coup]. CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 12(2), 123–156.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cabinet Secretariat. (2023). Kham-thae-long na-yo-bai khong khana rat-tha-mon-tri nayok rat-tha-mon-tri settha tha-wee-sin [Policy statement of the cabinet of Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin]. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://www.soc.go.th/?p=22892

Cabinet Secretariat. (2024). Kham-thae-long na-yo-bai khong khana rat-tha-mon-tri nang-sao pae-thong-tarn chin-na-wat nayok rat-tha-mon-tri [Policy statement of the cabinet of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra]. Retrieved October 31, 2024, from https://www.soc.go.th/?p=26856

Couperus, S., & van de Grift, L. (2022). Environment and democracy: An introduction. Journal of Modern European History, 20(3), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944221113271

Crotty, W. J., & Katz, R. S. (2005). Handbook of party politics. Sage.

Dueanpen, A. (2023). Pird na-yo-bai sing-waed-lom khong phak kan-mueang lueak-tang pi 2566 [Unveiling the environmental policies of political parties in the 2023 elections]. Urban Creature. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://urbancreature.co/next-thailand-environment

Election Commission of Thailand. (2023). 2023 general election summary report (in Thai). Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.ect.go.th

Elinoff, E., & Lamb, V. (2022). Environmentalisms in twenty-first century Thailand: Continuities, discontinuities, and emerging trajectories. Journal of Contemporary Asia, Advance online publication, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2051062

Ferdinand, P. (2023). Political parties. In R. Garner, P. Ferdinand, & S. Lawson (Eds.), Introduction to politics. Oxford University Press.

Hirsch, P. (1997). The politics of environment: Opposition and legitimacy. In Political change in Thailand. Routledge.

Hirsch, P., & Lohmann, L. (1989). Contemporary politics of environment in Thailand. Asian Survey, 29(4), 439–451. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2644886

Iheonu, C. O., Muoneke, O. B., & Agbutun, S. A. (2023). Investigating the democracy and environmental sustainability nexus in 52 African countries. Social Science Quarterly, 104(5), 1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13293

Jantimachaiamorn, C., Phasa, B., Jantima, R., Kanchanaphiphit, P., Mongkolrat, T., & Thitawongso, P. (2022). Kan wi-cha-ra khwam sam-phan ra-wang kan-mueang kap kan-pa-ti-wat lae rat-tha-pha-ran khong thai [Politics, revolutions, and coups in Thailand]. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation, 8(9), 177–189.

Jensen, C. B., & Sangkhamanee, J. (2024). Rewilding Bangkok. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 48(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13241

Jatusripitak, N., & Ricks, J. I. (2024). Age and ideology. Pacific Affairs, 97(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.5509/2024971-art6

Katz, R. S. (2023). Political parties (D. Caramani, Ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kenny, J., & Langsæther, P. E. (2023). Environmentalism as an independent dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 62(4), 1031–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12549

Kongkirati, P. (2024). Thailand: Contestation, polarization, and democratic regression. Cambridge University Press.

Laohabut, T., & McCargo, D. (2024). Thailand’s Movement Party. Journal of East Asian Studies, 24(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2024.1

McCargo, D., & Chattharakul, A. (2020). Future forward: The rise and fall of a Thai political party. NIAS Press.

Move Forward Party. (2023). Sing-waed-lom yang-yuen [Sustainable environment]. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://election66. moveforwardparty.org/policy/collection/PolicyCategory/52