Literature Review on The Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Applications

Main Article Content

Kanokkan Ketkaew
Wisanupong Potipiroon
Suwit Srimai

Abstract

                The business of developing mobile applications is growing. However, there are only a small number of successful applications because users do not accept or use most apps produced. This article aims to review factors affecting the adoption of mobile applications by summarizing and synthesizing the knowledge from three theories, namely, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2), and Diffusion Innovation Theory (DIT). Indeed, a theory alone can not provide a full picture of technology adoption; to date, there is a lack of systematic synthesis of these valuable theories. We have selected 25 papers in academic and research journals from SCImago & Country Rank in quartiles 1, 2, and 3 equal to 22, 1, and 2, respectively. These papers are in the area of business, management, marketing, accounting, and information technology. We summarized the factors that affected mobile application adoption from the three prominent theories (TAM, UTAUT 2, and DIT). The review indicated that the twelve factors influence mobile application in five stages of the adoption process. These are (1) External Variables (2) Perceived Usefulness (3) Perceived Ease of Use (4) Social Influence (5) Compatibility (6) Facilitating Conditions (7) Price Value (8)Trialability (9) Observability (10) Habit (11) Hedonic Motivation and (12) Attitude. This review can fill the gap to explain what factors affect each stage of the adoption process.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิชาการ (Review Article)

References

Al-Jabri, I. M., & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile banking adoption: Application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 379-391.

Chan-Olmsted, S., Rim, H., & Zerba, A. (2013). Mobile news adoption among young adults: examining the roles of perceptions, news consumption, and media usage. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 126-147.

Chong, A. Y. L., Chan, F. T., & Ooi, K. B. (2012). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34-43.

Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of new information technology: Theories and models Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 14(4), 3-32.

Distimo. (2011). Apple App Store makes 6x more revenue than Android market. Retrieved March 13, 2019, from https://www.gsmarena.com/apple_app_store_generates_6_times_more_revenue_than_android_market-news-3558.php

Dogtiev, A. (2019). App download and usage statistics (2018). Retrieved March 12, 2019, from http://www.businessofapps.com/data/app-statistics/

Google. (2016). How people use their phones for finance activities. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/advertising-channels/apps/app-marketing-mobile-banking/

Google/Ipsos. (2016). How people shop on their phones. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/advertising-channels/apps/app-marketing-mobile-shopping/

Hsiao, C. H., Chang, J. J., & Tang, K. Y. (2016). Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 342-355.

Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17-27.

Hyrynsalmi, S., Seppänen, M., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Suominen, A., Järveläinen, J., & Harkke, a. V. (2015). Busting myths of electronic word of mouth: The relationship between customer ratings and the sales of mobile applications. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 10(2), 1-18.

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Lim, E. (2014). Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes, intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 427-439.

Kang, J. Y. M., Mun, J. M., & Johnson, K. K. (2015). In-store mobile usage: Downloading and usage intention toward mobile location-based retail apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 210-217.

Kiwanuka, A. (2015). Acceptance process: The missing link between UTAUT and diffusion of innovation theory. American Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 40-44.

Lin, A., & Chen, N. C. (2012). Cloud computing as an innovation: Percepetion, attitude, and adoption. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 533-540.

Liu, F., Zhao, S., & Li, Y. (2017). How many, how often, and how new? A multivariate profiling of mobile app users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 71-80.

Localytics. (2016). The 2016 app marketing guide. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from http://pages.localytics.com/2016-app-marketing-guide.html

López-Nicolás, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management, 45(6), 359-364.

Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance Model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770-783.

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.

Muk, A., & Chung, C. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 1-6.

Ozturk, A. B., & Hancer, M. (2015). The effects of demographics and past experience on RFID technology acceptance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 16(3), 275-289.

Pagani, M. (2004). Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 46-59.

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

Positioning (2017). Thai people has average 32 apps on smartphone, but buy the item in apps more than others country in region. Retrieved April 7, 2018, from https://positioningmag.com/1109998

Rogers, E. (2003). The diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). London: The free press.

Smartbear. (2014). Nearly 50% of consumers will delete a mobile app if they encounter a single bug, reveals survey by smartBear. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://smartbear.com/news/news-releases/the-state-of-mobile-testing-2014.aspx/

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-198.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.

Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 43(3), 350-363.