Exploring Thai EFL Learners' Preferences for Speaking Activities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This study aimed to determine the preferred speaking activities of Thai EFL learners and to explore the rationale behind their preferences. The participants were 44 first-year English major students enrolled in the Listening and Speaking in Daily Life course at the University of Phayao, Thailand. The participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews and analyzed through descriptive statistics and content analysis. The results showed that Thai EFL learners most preferred engaging in language games (79.55%), conversations (70.45%), role plays (65.91%), pronunciation drills (61.36%), and describing pictures (59.09%). Other speaking activities were less preferred. Findings from the interviews with 11 participants further supported these preferences, revealing that learners found the top five activities to be motivating, relaxing, and enjoyable. Participants noted that these activities encouraged group work, provided more opportunities to speak the language, and helped them improve their speaking skills. Understanding learners' preferred speaking activities can help educators design teaching strategies and materials that resonate with students' needs, fostering a more supportive and effective language-learning environment.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใดๆ
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใดๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักอักษรจากวารสารทดสอบระบบ ThaiJo2 ก่อนเท่านั้น
References
Adamson, J. (2004). Culture and English language teaching in Thailand. RELC Journal, 35(1), 37-57.
Baker, W. (2015). Culture and identity through English as a lingua franca: Rethinking concepts and goals in intercultural communication. De Gruyter.
Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 71(3), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2004.0045
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Khamkhien, A. (2010). Teaching English speaking and English speaking tests in the Thai context: A reflection from Thai teachers. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 184-190.
Leong, L., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34
Mahmoodi, H., Narafshan, M. H., & Shahabi, H. (2021). Learners’ preferences in English language learning: A cross-sectional study at Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 18(1), 196-210. https://doi.org/10.22062/sdme.2021.196170.1060
Mon, P. (2019). A study on students’ preference for classroom activities and perceptions of the effectiveness of those activities in English language learning. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 3(5), 1828-1836.
Moore, D. (2011). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. SAGE Publications.
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge.
Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279-295.
Pachina, E. (2020, February 17). Drilling as a teaching method: Pros and cons. International TEFL and TESOL Training (ITTT). https://www.teflcourse.net/blog/drilling-as-a-teaching-method-pros-and-cons
Plengkham, S., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2023). Enhancing Thai EFL learners' speaking abilities through integrated performance assessment. LEARN Journal, 16(1), 448–472.
Qamariah, H. (2017). What do our students want? A case study of EFL speaking students’ views of activities in the speaking classroom. Getsempena English Education Journal, 4(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v4i1.721
Rao, P. S. (2019). The importance of speaking skills in English classrooms. Alford Council of International English and Literature Journal, 2(2), 1-12.
Rethinking concepts and goals in intercultural communication. De Gruyter. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Samperio, N. (2017). Discovering students' preference for classroom activities and teachers' frequency of activity use. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.9292
Sha'ar, M. Y. M. A., & Boonsuk, Y. (2021). What hinders English speaking in Thai EFL learners? Investigating factors that affect the development of their English speaking skills. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 45(3). https://mextesol.net
Tipmontree, S., & Tasanameelarp, A. (2021). Using role-playing activities to improve Thai EFL students’ oral English communication skills. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(3), 1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3345.2020
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.