HUMAN AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN PLATFORM-BASED FREELANCING: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT IN FREELANCE SUCCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60101/rmuttgber.2026.295804Keywords:
Human capital, Social capital, Digital engagement, Freelance successAbstract
The rapid expansion of global digital labor platforms has increased opportunities for Thai freelancers to access cross-border work. However, success in algorithmically governed labor markets depends on more than technical competence alone. It involves the interplay of individual capabilities, relational networks, and platform-based engagement behaviors. This quantitative study develops and tests a structural model examining the effects of human capital, social capital, and digital engagement on freelance success. Data were collected from 459 Thai freelancers with verified cross-border experience and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Research results indicate that human capital has significant direct effects on social capital, digital engagement, and freelance success. Social capital emerges as the strongest predictor of freelance success and positively influences digital engagement. Bootstrap mediation analysis confirms that both social capital and digital engagement transmit the effects of human capital to career outcomes. Research findings suggest that freelance success in platform economies is shaped by the interaction between competence, network embeddedness, and digital engagement behaviors. These results provide empirical evidence from an emerging economy context and offer implications for strengthening workforce capability development in global digital labor markets.
References
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Science, 64(12), 5497–5520. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2019). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kuek, S. C., Paradi-Guilford, C., Fayomi, T., Imaizumi, S., Ipeirotis, P., Pina, C., & Singh, M. (2015). The global opportunity in online outsourcing (Report No. 22284). World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22284
Kuhn, K. M., & Maleki, A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0111
Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. MIT Press.
Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2018). The global platform economy: A new offshoring institution enabling emerging-economy microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318786781
Newlands, G. (2020). Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Touchstone Books.
Sattayathamrongthian, M., Janprachum, W., Makerd, P., & Wongthaworn, K. (2023). Medical tourism in Thailand: A case study of the Bangkok metropolitan area. EurASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 5(42), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.5(42).2023.289-298
Sattayathamrongthian, M., & Vanpetch, Y. (2023). A qualitative examination of Thai freelancers’ business model enhancement through the integration of social and human capital in the global market. E3S Web of Conferences, 458, 05030. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345805030
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2018). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mahachai Sattayathamrongthian, Pawaris Makerd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal are the intellectual property of their respective authors.
The views and opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the individual authors and do not reflect the positions of Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi or any of its faculty members. All components and content of each article are the sole responsibility of the respective authors. In the event of any errors, the authors shall bear full responsibility for their own work.
