SUSTAINABILITY VERSUS REGENERATIVE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRISMA-BASED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THEORETICAL EVOLUTION AND CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARIES (2010-2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60101/rmuttgber.2026.292872Keywords:
Sustainability, Regenerative Supply Chain, Circular Economy, PRISMA, Systematic ReviewAbstract
Supply chain management has shifted from a focus on cost efficiency toward sustainability and, more recently, regeneration. Yet the boundaries between sustainable supply chain management, the circular economy, and regenerative supply chains remain unclear. This study conducts a systematic review following PRISMA 2020, covering literature from 2010–2025 across four databases. From 255 initial records, only nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings show that sustainability and the circular economy (CE) are well-developed, grounded in frameworks such as Stakeholder Theory, the Resource-Based View (RBV), and Network Theory, supported by measurable indicators. In contrast, regenerative supply chain management (RSCM) lacks clear definition, frameworks, and metrics. Current discussions are mostly normative, emphasizing ecosystem restoration, community well-being, and net-positive outcomes. The study concludes that RSCM requires new frameworks and indicators, including biodiversity gains, soil carbon sequestration, and social equity indices. Integrating regenerative principles into policies and strategies, particularly within ASEAN and Thailand, can help shift supply chains from minimizing harm to creating verifiable net-positive impacts.
References
Aldas-Salazar, D., Díaz-Madroñero, M., & Mula, J. (2023, July). Proposal of a Methodology and Associated Techniques for the Design and Management of the Global Supply Chain Operations Strategy According to a Circular Economy Criterion. In Industry 4.0: The Power of Data: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (pp. 327-334). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29382-5_32
Bodrožić, Z., & Gold, S. (2024). Building Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive Operations and Supply Chains: Bringing Public Policy Back In. Production and Operations Management, 34(4), 837-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241229077
Brandenburg, M., & Gruchmann, T. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management—A conceptual framework and future research perspectives. Sustainability, 11(24), 7235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247239
Khalil, F. G. (2025). Beyond incrementalism: A regenerative learning model for sustainable marketing and service ecosystems. AMS Review, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-025-00306-z
Kim, J.-G., & Lee, S.-Y. (2011). Determinants of integrating sustainability into supply chain management. Journal of the Korea Society of Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 19–32. Available at: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE02354066
Matthews, L., Gold, S., & Schleper, M. C. (2025). Broadening the scope of operations and supply chain management scholarship on diversity, equity, and inclusion: Justice, paradox, and dialectical lenses. Production and Operations Management, 34(4), 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241243384
McLoughlin, K. M., Hines, A., Nudurupati, S. S., & Lascelles, D. (2015). Key sustainable supply chain management processes: A conceptual framework grounded in network theory. Manchester Metropolitan University e-space. Available at: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/619710/
Molamohamadi, Z., Ismail, N., Leman, Z., & Norzima, Z. (2014). Developing a framework for sustainable supply chain management. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 564, 661–666. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.564.661
Muradin, M. (2022). Circular models for sustainable supply chain management. In Circular economy and sustainable development (pp. 189–205). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179788-12
Oyefusi, O. N., Enegbuma, W. I., Brown, A., & Zari, M. P. (2022, November). Regenerative-based green supply chain management model for the construction industry. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1101, No. 8, p. 082028). IOP Publishing.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Reuters. (2024, June 10). Rewarding farmers for regenerative agriculture is critical to decarbonising food sector. Reuters News. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/land-use-biodiversity/rewarding-farmers-regenerative-agriculture-is-critical-decarbonising-food-sector-2024-06-10/
Shaharudin, M. R., Mokhtar, A. R. M., Wararatchai, P., & Legino, R. (2022). Circular supply Chain Management and Circular Economy: a conceptual model. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7.3762
Silva, M. E., & Ruel, S. (2022). Inclusive purchasing and supply chain resilience capabilities: lessons for social sustainability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(5), 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100767
Stroumpoulis, A., & Kopanaki, E. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on sustainable supply chain management and digital transformation: A literature review and a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 14(8), 4862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084862
Wu, S. N. (2023). Simulation-based analysis of (reverse) supply chains in circular product–service-systems. In Advances in Production Management Systems: Towards Sustainable and Resilient Manufacturing (pp. 147–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28839-5_13
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kittinun Makprang, Prin Weerapong, Varunya Kaewchueaknang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles published in this journal are the intellectual property of their respective authors.
The views and opinions expressed in each article are solely those of the individual authors and do not reflect the positions of Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi or any of its faculty members. All components and content of each article are the sole responsibility of the respective authors. In the event of any errors, the authors shall bear full responsibility for their own work.

