THE RELATIONS AMONG THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF RESOURCES INDUSTRY IN SET

Authors

  • Srisamorn Pongput College of Innovation Management, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin
  • Korbkul Jantarakolica College of Innovation Management, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin

Abstract

Currently, the global large institutional investors are questioning about corporate social performance besides the profit; this is the focus on the stakeholders both inside and outside the organization. It is a strategy that increases reliability and boosts long-term growth for the organization, especially for the resources business that considerably affects society and environment. Consequently, it is highly necessary to pay attention on the corporate social performance. This study aimed at examining the relations among the institutional investors, corporate social performance, and firm performance of companies in the group of resources industry, and at studying the factors that affect such variables. It was found from the study that the firm with good performance would led to increased corporate social performance, thus attracting institutional investors. Also, the firm with the increased proportion of shareholding of institutional investors and corporate social performance would lead to better performance as well. It was found that the size of business leads to the increased proportion of shareholding of institutional investors, corporate social performance, and performance; while the proportion of executives and the committee would lead to the decrease of institutional investors and corporate social performance, but leading to the better performance. The element of independent directors and non-executive directors leads to the decrease of corporate social performance.

References

Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2003, November). The impact of institutional ownership on corporate operating performance. NYU Working Paper No. S-CG-0305. Retried from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295248

Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 564-576.

Khanthavit, A. (2012). A CSR – implementation model for value creation. Bangkok: Thummasart University. Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, and financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31, 233-253.

Nathaphan Sarayut. (2012). Return performance of CSR firm: A factor–model approach. Bangkok: Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy Thammasat University.

Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108-131.

O’Shannassy, T., & Hunter, P. (2009). A management consultant’s guide to how strategic architecture can improve an organization’s Bottom line. Singapore Management Review, 31(1), 33–47.

Orlitaky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.

Sahut, J. M., & Gharbi, H. O. (2010). Institutional investors’ typology and firm performance: The case of French firms. International Journal of Business, 15(1) 33–50.

Srijunpetch Sillapaporn. (2008). Board of directors ownership structure on economic value added. Journal of Accounting Profession, 4(10), 26-39.

Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997) .Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3). 658–672.

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1995). Attraction or repulsion: How institutional owners react to corporate social performance. Management research News, 18(12), 20-24.

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2015

How to Cite

PONGPUT, S.; JANTARAKOLICA, K. THE RELATIONS AMONG THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF RESOURCES INDUSTRY IN SET. RMUTT Global Business and Economics Review, Pathum Thani, Thailand, v. 10, n. 2, p. 129–140, 2015. Disponível em: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RMUTT-Gber/article/view/242006. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Articles