THE RELATIONS AMONG THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF RESOURCES INDUSTRY IN SET
Abstract
Currently, the global large institutional investors are questioning about corporate social performance besides the profit; this is the focus on the stakeholders both inside and outside the organization. It is a strategy that increases reliability and boosts long-term growth for the organization, especially for the resources business that considerably affects society and environment. Consequently, it is highly necessary to pay attention on the corporate social performance. This study aimed at examining the relations among the institutional investors, corporate social performance, and firm performance of companies in the group of resources industry, and at studying the factors that affect such variables. It was found from the study that the firm with good performance would led to increased corporate social performance, thus attracting institutional investors. Also, the firm with the increased proportion of shareholding of institutional investors and corporate social performance would lead to better performance as well. It was found that the size of business leads to the increased proportion of shareholding of institutional investors, corporate social performance, and performance; while the proportion of executives and the committee would lead to the decrease of institutional investors and corporate social performance, but leading to the better performance. The element of independent directors and non-executive directors leads to the decrease of corporate social performance.
References
Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 564-576.
Khanthavit, A. (2012). A CSR – implementation model for value creation. Bangkok: Thummasart University. Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, and financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31, 233-253.
Nathaphan Sarayut. (2012). Return performance of CSR firm: A factor–model approach. Bangkok: Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy Thammasat University.
Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108-131.
O’Shannassy, T., & Hunter, P. (2009). A management consultant’s guide to how strategic architecture can improve an organization’s Bottom line. Singapore Management Review, 31(1), 33–47.
Orlitaky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
Sahut, J. M., & Gharbi, H. O. (2010). Institutional investors’ typology and firm performance: The case of French firms. International Journal of Business, 15(1) 33–50.
Srijunpetch Sillapaporn. (2008). Board of directors ownership structure on economic value added. Journal of Accounting Profession, 4(10), 26-39.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997) .Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3). 658–672.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1995). Attraction or repulsion: How institutional owners react to corporate social performance. Management research News, 18(12), 20-24.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของผู้นิพนธ์
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลธัญบุรี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
