The Development of a Learning Activity Package in Music and Art Education Integrating Artificial Intelligence Technology to Enhance Aesthetic Awareness Among Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/muspaj.v8i2.295658Keywords:
Music and Art Learning Activity Package, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology, Aesthetic AwarenessAbstract
This research aimed to 1) develop a music and art learning activity package integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology; 2) study the appropriateness of the developed package; and 3) evaluate the aesthetic awareness of students after implementing the activities. The sample consisted of 161 undergraduate students, selected through purposive sampling. The learning package comprised 10 units, integrating Creative Learning, Experiential Learning, and AI technology. Research instruments included an appropriateness evaluation form for the learning package and a 5-component self-assessment form for aesthetic awareness.
The research findings were as follows:
1. The 10 learning activity units passed content validity testing by experts, with an Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.80 to 1.00. This exceeds the specified criterion (IOC ≥ 0.50), indicating that the activities are consistent with the learning objectives and appropriate for implementation.
2. The overall appropriateness of the learning package was at a high level ( = 4.50, S.D.= 0.51). The aspect with the highest mean was the congruence of learning objectives, demonstrating that the package is systematic, possesses clear procedures, and is suitable for actual classroom instruction.
3. The overall aesthetic awareness after implementation was at a high level ( = 4.25, S.D.=0.54), with all components rated at a high level. The component with the highest mean was Art Appreciation ( = 4.41), while Aesthetic Creativity (=4.12) had the lowest mean.
These results reflect that the developed learning activity package effectively creates an environment conducive to promoting students' aesthetic awareness.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bampenthan, T., Posrithong, A., & Satjapiboon, S. (2025). Development of an interdisciplinary integration music instructional model in the development of higher order musical thinking skills of secondary school students. Mahidol Music Journal, 8(1), 38–52. (In Thai).
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Malisuwan, S. (2010). Artificial intelligence: Principles and applications. SE-ED Education. (In Thai).
Mungphattanasunthorn, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education: Opportunities and challenges. Thammasat University Press. (In Thai).
National Art Education Association. (2016). NAEA strategic vision (2015–2020).
OECD. (2019). OECD learning compass 2030: A series of concept notes.
Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49–60.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2014). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
Siripitakchai, S. (2016). The development of learning activity packages to enhance creative thinking skills. Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 145–160.
Thamrongsottisakul, W. (2017). The development of learning activity packages. Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai).
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Music and Performing Arts Khon Kaen University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.