Home Visits as a Tool for Promoting Peace Education and Cooperation Between Schools and Families in Borderline Communities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore the role of home visits as a tool for promoting peace education and cooperation between schools and families in border communities, with a focus on Suphanburi Province. The research used in-depth interviews and participatory observation as the primary data collection methods, selecting 12 key informants from teachers and parents in the study area through purposive sampling. The data obtained from the interviews and observations were analyzed through content synthesis and validated using the triangulation technique. The findings reveal that home visits help foster understanding and build positive relationships between teachers and families in Suphanburi. Teachers gain insights into the daily challenges faced by students, such as economic issues, access to education, and family problems, which directly impact student learning. Home visits also create a space for discussions on peace and coexistence in a diverse society, where parents and teachers can exchange views on cultural and religious differences, which are essential for building peace in the community. Furthermore, home visits contribute to enhancing cooperation between schools and families in addressing educational challenges, particularly in areas with limited resources and access to education. Teachers and parents collaborate to support students' learning, such as organizing supplementary educational activities at home. This cooperation helps foster sustainable, high-quality education.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The views, opinions, and pictures expressed in this journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the editor and the editorial board. All rights are reserved by the authors and the Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies of Mahidol University. No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the journal’s editor, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Non-commercial use of information in this journal must be properly referenced.
References
Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of peace: The hidden side of history. Syracuse University Press.
De Coning, C. (2018). Adaptive peacebuilding. International Affairs, 94(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix251
Donais, T. (2012). Peacebuilding and local ownership: Post conflict consensus building. Routledge.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of PeacePress.
McEvoy-Levy, S. (2018). Peace and resistance in youth cultures: Reading the politics of peacebuilding from Harry Potter to the hunger games. Palgrave Macmillan.
Millar, G. (2014). An ethnographic approach to peacebuilding: Understanding local experiences in transitional states. Routledge.
Phanitch, W. (2019). Wičhai chan rīan plīan khrū [Classroom research: Transforming teachers]. Siam Kammachal Foundation. (in Thai)
Phanitch, W. (2022). ư̄a rabop Niwēt phư̄a khrū pen phū kō̜kān. [Enabling the learning system for teachers as entrepreneurs]. Siam Kammachon Foundation. (in Thai)
Phiwkham, B., & Hanthet, S. (2023). The factors promoting culture of peace in educational institutions. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 10(5), 206–213.
Pluemchit, K. (2023). Kānʻō̜kbǣp kānrīanrū thī sœ̄m phalang yaowa chon khō̜ nop bō̜ sakkayaphāp khō̜ng tonʻēng [Young active citizens: Designing learning that empowers youth to discover their potential]. Siam Kammachon Foundation. (in Thai)
Saenmee, V. (2017). The principles of Buddhist teachings for peaceful coexistence. Humanities & Social Sciences, 34(2), 217-224.
Sangpadung, R. (2021). Kān yīam bān nakrīan khō̜ng khrū sangkat Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n nai kāndūlǣ chūailư̄a kaʻā yu hok - sipsō̜ng pī thī mī panhā phrưttikam - ʻārom [Home visits by teachers under the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration in supporting children aged 6-12 with behavioral and emotional problems] [Master's thesis, Thammasat University]. (in Thai)
Suepheng, P., & Pakdeewong, P. (2019). The guidelines for managing peace education for reduce violence in basic education schools. Journal of Education and Innovation, 21(2), 225–238.
Swee, N. S. (2020). Bridging gaps in education: The impact of home visits in underprivileged communities. Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 77-85.
