Importance of Right to Fair Trial: Legal Analysis of Court Hearings of Political Activists in Myanmar after the 2021 Coup

Main Article Content

Ei Yatanar Myint

Abstract




Political activists in Myanmar have faced significant challenges in accessing their right to a fair trial, particularly since the military coup in 2021. The right to a fair trial is guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which ensures that individuals have the right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal. However, following the military coup and the establishment of a special system of court hearings for politically motivated cases, political activists face significant challenges in securing their right to a fair trial during the court hearings. This research article analyzes the court hearing system for political activists in Myanmar from the perspective of the right to a public hearing. Using qualitative research methods and interviews with lawyers and detainees' family members, this study examines the challenges political activists face in accessing their right to a fair trial at their court hearings. This research indicates that a system of closed-door hearings for political cases may elevate the probability of wrongful convictions. This study investigates the implications of restricted public access to Myanmar's special courts for the right to a fair trial of political activists.




Article Details

How to Cite
Myint, E. Y. (2025). Importance of Right to Fair Trial: Legal Analysis of Court Hearings of Political Activists in Myanmar after the 2021 Coup. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 11(1), 1–19. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HRPS/article/view/280581
Section
Research Articles

References

Al Jazeera. (2023, September 7). Myanmar jails photojournalist for 20 years on first day of closed trial. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/7/myanmar-jails-photojournalist- for-20-years-on-first-day-of-closed-trial

Amnesty International (2014, April 9). Fair Trial Manual (2nd ed.). Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/002/2014/en/

Becirovic-Alic, M. (2018). The right to a fair trial as a part of the basic human rights and freedoms. Journal of European and Balkan Perspectives, (November), 38-55.

Benesh, S. C. (2006). Understanding public confidence in American Courts. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00455.x.

Christenson, R., (1983). A political theory of political trials. Journal of Criminal law and criminology, 74(2),547-577, https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6373&context

=jclc

Khaing, M. M., & Cho, Y. M. (2021). Judicial corruption as a violation of human rights in Myanmar. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 7(Supplemental), 212-237. https://so03.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/HRPS/article/view/254327

Crouch, M. (2009). Judicial power in Myanmar and the challenge of judicial. Cambridge University Press.

Darle, C. S. (2002). I am moral, but you are deterred": Differential attributions about why people obey the law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 375-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00221.x

Free Expression Myanmar (FEM), 2023. Myanmar military justice system: Lived experience of lawyer, courts, and trial after the coup. FEM. https://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/07/myanmar-militarys-justice-system.pdf

Frontier Myanmar. (2022, March 17). No justice behind bars: the coup and the judiciary. Frontier Myanmar. https://www.frontiermyanmar.net/en/no-justice-behind-bars-the-coup-and-the- judiciary/

Hager, T. (2015). Publicity as one of the safeguard of fair trial. Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, 60, 200-215.

Human Rights Watch. (2023, June 8). Our numbers are dwindling: Myanmar's post-coup crackdown on lawyers. Human Rights Watch.

International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). (2022, February 10). Myanmar: A year after military takeover, no rule of law or judicial independence. ICJ. https://www.icj.org/myanmar-a-year- after-military-takeover-no-rule-of-law-or-judicial-independence/

Jackson, J. D., & Summers, S. J. (2018). Obstacles to fairness in criminal proceedings: Individual rights and institutional (2nd ed.). Bloomsbur. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/obstacles-to- fairness-in-criminal-proceedings

Jaconelli, J. (1997). Rights theories and public trial. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14(2),169-175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24353947

Justice Base (2017). Behind closed doors: Obstacles and opportunities for public access to Myanmar’s courts. Open Society Foundations. https://www.myjusticemyanmar.org/sites/default/files/Justice-Base-Behind-Closed- Doors.compressed-1.pdf

Krehbiel, J. N. (2016). The politics of judicial procedures: The role of public oral hearings in the German Constitutional Court. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 990-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12229

Langford, I. (2009). Fair trial: The history of an idea. Journal of Human Rights, 8(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830902765857

Mikuli, P., & Kuca, G. (2016). The public hearing and law-making procedures. Liverpool Law Review, 37, 1-17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10991-016-9177-z

My Justice. (2018). Searching for justice in the law: Understanding access to justice in Myanmar. British Council.

https://www.myjusticemyanmar.org/sites/default/files/MJS%20Report_FINAL_online.pdf

Ochab, E. (2022). Crackdown on human rights defenders, opposition, and the right to a fair trial in Myanmar. International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute.

Posner, E. A. (2005). Political trials in domestic and international law. Duke Law Journal, 55(75), 76-150. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=dlj

Reuters. (2023, September 6). Myanmar court jails photojournalist for 20 years. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/myanmar-court-jails-photojournalist-20-years- 2023-09-06/

Sombra, T. L. (2019). Why should public hearings in the Brazilian Supreme Court be understood as an innovative democratic tool in constitutional adjudication? German Law Journal, 17(4), 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021398

The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma). (2023). The Flow of Injustice. AAPP. https://aappb.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Final_Prison-Situational-Report-10-Jul- 2023.pdf

_______. (2024, July 1). No return home: Those who no chance to go back home from behind bars. [PowerPoint slides]. Bordermedia. https://aappb.org/?p=28574

_______. (2024, July 11). Daily briefing in relation to the military coup [PowerPoint slides]. Bordermedia. https://

aappb.org/?p=28676

United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. (2007, August 23). General comment no.32. UN Treaty Body Database.

https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CC PR%2FC%2FGC%2F32&Lang=en

VOA News. (2024, January 11). Myanmar documentary filmmaker sentenced to life in prison. VOA. https://www.voanews.com/a/myanmar-documentary-filmmaker-sentenced-to-life-in- prison-/7436882.html

Zaw, M. T., Lwin, T. T. & Hayes, M. G. (2021). Fair trial elements in the implementation of the case management programme in Myanmar’s courts. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 7 (Supplemental), 183-211.

https://so03.tci- thaijo.org/index.php/HRPS/article/view/254008