Developing Bangkok metropolitan to learning city for all generations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research article is aimed to compare the attitude for the characteristics of learning city of every generation living in Bangkok metropolitan and synthesize the guideline for developing Bangkok Metropolitan to learning city for all generations. Questionnaire was applied as research tool for this quantitative research. The research data was collected from 400 people currently living in Bangkok area. Descriptive statistic and One-Way ANOVA were employed to analyzed the data. The result from One- Way ANOVA was examined together with attitude’s average score to synthesize the guideline by researcher. The research findings showed that 1) Wider benefits of building a learning city what should be managed first is promoting potential and social cohesion for Baby Boomer and Generation X while supporting technology and enhancing teamwork mechanism are needed for Generation Y; 2) Major building blocks of a learning city fostering family-based or community-based learning and developing systems that recognize and reward all forms of learning for Baby Boomer and Generation X are needed to be managed first; 3) Fundamental conditions for building a learning city what need to be done first is formulating policy and strategy by Bangkok Governor to promote citizens’ role and participation and formulating the mechanism to develop a good governance system, including allocating budget and facilities to support the lifelong learning for Baby Boomer and Generation Y.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ผลงานที่ปรากฎในวารสารฉบับนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะส่วนบุคคลของผู้เขียนซึ่งต้องรับผิดชอบต่อผลทาง กฎหมายที่อาจเกิดขึ้นได้และไม่มีผลต่อกองบรรณาธิการReferences
รศรินทร์ เกรย์, อุมาภรณ์ ภัทรวาณิชย์, อักษราภัค หลักทอง, และเจตพล แสงกล้า. (2559). คุณภาพชีวิตต่างวัยของผู้มีงานทำ. นครปฐม: สถาบันวิจัยประชากรและสังคม มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล.
สุวิธิดา จรุงเกียรติกุล. (2561). แนวทางการจัดศึกษาตลอดชีวิตเพื่อขับเคลื่อนชุมชนการเรียนรู้ ในบริบทสังคมและวัฒนธรรมของประเทศไทย. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. 46(2), 218-239.
Aksakal, N. (2015). Theoretical view to the approach of the edutainment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1232–1239.
Andersen, K., Ohme, J., Bjarnøe, C., Bordacconi, M. J., Albæk, E., & De Vreese, C. H. (2021). Generational gaps in political media use and civic engagement: from baby boomers to generation Z. Oxford: Routledge London and New York.
Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Connecting with generation Z: Approaches in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(3), 180-184.
CISCO. (2010). The learning society. San Jose, CA: CISCO Public Information.
Daggol, G. D. (2017). Lifelong learning: not a 21st century, but an omnitemporal skill. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 4(12), 1254-1267.
Dida, S., Hafiar, H., Kadiyono, A. L., & Lukman, S. (2021). Gender, education, and digital generations as determinants of attitudes toward health information for health workers in West Java, Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(1), e05916.
Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristics of generation Z. E-mentor, 74(2), 44-50.
Estebsari, F., Dastoorpoor, M., Khalifehkandi, Z. R., Nouri, A., Mostafaei, D., Hosseini, M., Esmaeili, R., & Aghababaeian, H. (2020). The concept of successful aging: a review article. Current aging science, 13(1), 4-10.
Lynott, J., Harrell, R., Guzman, S., & Gudzinas, B. (2018). The livability index 2018: Transforming communities for all ages. AARP Public Policy Institute.
Slagsvold, B., & Hansen, T. (2021). The baby-boomer generation: Another breed of elderly people? In Generational Tensions and Solidarity Within Advanced Welfare States. (pp. 153-172). Routledge.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2015). UNESCO global network of learning cities: Guiding documents. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
Yamane, Taro. (1967). Statistics, an introductory analysis. 2nd Edition. New York: Harper and Row.
Zhang, X., Warner, M. E., & Firestone, S. (2020). Overcoming barriers to livability for all ages: Inclusivity is the key. Urban Planning, 4(2), 31-42.
Translated Thai References
Charungkaittikul, S. (2018). Guidelines for lifelong education management to mobilize learning community in the social-cultural context of Thailand. Journal of Education Studies. 46(2), 218-239. (in Thai)
Gray, Rossarin, Pattaravanich, Umaporn, Lucktong, Aksarapak, & Sangkla. Jettapon. (2016). Quality of life among employed population by generations. Nakon Phatom: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University. (in Thai)