Antecedents Affecting Performance of the medical device business in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) analyze the transformational leadership, innovative climate, knowledge management system, innovative work behavior and firm performance 2) study causal relationship of transformational leadership, innovation climate, knowledge management system and innovative work behavior in which affect work performance of medical device business in Thailand 3) examine the accordance of causal relationship between the antecedents affecting performance of the medical device business in Thailand and the empirical data. The research was analyzed by utilizing structural equation model (SEM) technique. The analysis of structural equation model, according to the hypothesis, the model is partly compatible with the empirical data and completely compatible to the hypothesis. Transformational Leadership, Innovation climate and Knowledge management system indirectly affects innovative work behavior statistical significance level of 0.001. Lastly, Innovative work behavior directly affects organization performance at statistical significance level of 0.05.
Article Details
References
ดนัย อังควัฒนวิทย์. (2563). ศูนย์พัฒนานวัตกรรมทางการแพทย์ MIND CENTER (Medical Innovations Development Center). นิตยสารวาไรตี้เพื่อสุขภาพ At Rama.mahidol.ac.th, 33: 6-7.
ไทยรัฐออนไลน์. (2561). เวทีนวัตกรรมสุดล้ำ อุปกรณ์การแพทย์ ยกระดับอุตสาหกรรม. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 กรกฎาคม 2561, จาก https://www.thairath.co.th/news/society/1332567.
ธนกฤต แซ่โค้ว. (2557). ปัจจัยด้านองค์กรที่ส่งผลต่อพฤติกรรมเชิงนวัตกรรมในการปฏิบัติงานเพื่อรองรับเศรษฐกิจอาเซียนของกลุ่มอุตสาหกรรมแปรรูปเนื้อสัตว์ในเขตกรุงเทพมหานครและปริมณฑล. (บริหารธุรกิจมหาบัณฑิต), มหาวิทยาลัยกรุงเทพ.
ธนาคารกรุงศรีอยุธยา. (2561). อุตสาหกรรมเครื่องมือแพทย์ แนวโน้มธุรกิจ/อุตสาหกรรม ปี 2561-63. สืบค้นเมื่อ
ธันวาคม 2561. จาก https://www.krungsri.com/bank/getmedia/5f9a1f83-e3f6-45da-9a52-5fda bba45ae6/IO_Medical_Devices_2018_TH.aspx
ศิริชัย พงษ์วิชัย. (2556). การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูลทางสถิติด้วยคอมพิวเตอร์. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 24. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
อาภรณีน์ อินฟ้าแสง. (2563, มกราคม-เมษายน). บุพปัจจัยที่มีอิทธิพลต่อผลการดำเนินงานของธุรกิจเครื่องมือแพทย์ในประเทศไทย. วารสารมนุษยศาสตร์ และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยธนบุรี, 15(1).
อุตสาหกรรมพัฒนามูลนิธิ สถาบันพลาสติก. (2562). ข้อมูลผู้ประกอบการธุรกิจเครื่องมือแพทย์ในประเทศไทย. สืบค้นเมื่อ 28 ธันวาคม 2562, จาก http://medicaldevices.oie.go.th/CompanyList.aspx?tid=1&id=2
Aaker, D.A., Kumar, V., Day, G.S. (2001). Marketing Research, 7th edition. John Wiley and Sons New York, NY.
Agbim, KC. (2013). The impact of organizational structure and leadership styles on innovation. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 56-63. agility. Applied mathematics in Engineering Management and Technology, 2(2), 66-87.
Avolio. B.J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International journal of testing. 1(1), 55-86.
Camisón, C. & Villar-López, A. (2012). Organizationa linnovation a sanenabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1): 2891-2902.
De Jong, J.P.J., & Den Hartog, D.N., (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1): 41-64.
Grossman. M. (2007). The emerging academic discipline of knowledge management. Journal of information systems education, 18(1): 31-38.
Gundry, L.K., Muñoz-Fernandez, A., Of stein, L.F. & Ortega-Egea, T. (2015). Innovating in organizations: a model of climate components facilitating the creation of new value, Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(2), 223-238.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.,;& Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5thed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hartog, D.N.D., Muijen, J.J., & Koopman. V. (1997). Transactional vs Transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(1): 19-34.
Hughes, D., Lee, A., Tian, A., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5): 549-569.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 79.
Khalili, A. (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Management Decision, 54(9): 2277-2293.
King, W.R., & Marks, P.V. (2008). Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. Omega, 36(1): 131–146.
Kline, R.B. (2011). Methodology in the Social Sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rded. Guilford Press.
Oke. A. (2013). Linking manufacturing edibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(2): 242-247.
Roderic, G. A. (2007). Climate of Success: Creating the right organizational climate for high performance. Butterworth-Heinemann Publisher.
Schneider. B. (2000). The psychological life of organizations. in Ashkanasy, N.M. and Peterson, M.E. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 17-21.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G., (1996). A beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Soto-Acosta, P., & Cegarra-Navarro. J.G. (2016). New ICTs for knowledge management in organizations. Journal Knowledge Management, 417-422.
Waleed, O. (2015). Innovative behavior and venture performance of SMEs: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2): 195-217.
West, M. A., & Farr. J. L., (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Wilson, Todd C. (2018). A Case Study of Exploration into the Transformational Leadership Styles of Global Senior Leaders in the Medical Device Industry in the Context of Organizational Change. (Doctoral Thesis Department Global Leadership). University institution Indiana Institute of Technology.
Woocheol, K., & Jiwon P. (2017). Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations. Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, 9(2): 1-16.
Translated Thai References
Angkawattanawit, D. (2020). Medical Innovation Development Center, MIND CENTER (Medical Innovations Development Center). Variety for Health at Rama.mahidol.ac.th. 33: 6-7. (in Thai)
Bank of Ayudhya. (2561). Medical device industry Business/industry trends 2018-63. Retrieved December 5, 2018, From https://www.krungsri.com/bank/getmedia/5f9a1f83-e3f6-45da-9a52-5fdabba45ae6/ IO_Medical_Devices_2018_EN.aspx (in Thai)
Infahsaeng, A. (2020, January-April). Antecedents Affecting Performance of the medical device business in Thailand. Journalism and Social Science, Thonburi University, 15(1). (in Thai)
Medical Device Intelligence Unit. (2019). Information for medical device business operator in Thailand. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from http://medicaldevices.oie.go.th/CompanyList.aspx?tid=1&id=2 (in Thai)
Phongwichai, S. (2013). Statistical data analysis by computer. 24thed. Bangkok: The Publisher of Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Saekow, T. (2014). Organizational factors affecting the innovative behavior in operations for the ASEAN economy of the meat processing industry group in Bangkok and its vicinity. (Master of Business Administration), Bangkok University. (in Thai)
Thairath Online. (2018). The most innovative stage Medical equipment Industrial upgrading. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from https://www.thairath.co.th/news/society/1332567. (in Thai)