Social Associations and Political Participation: An Approach to Consolidate Democracy in Thailand?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this research article are: (1) to identify influences of demographic factors on participation in social associations or organizations of the Thai people; (2) to analyze relationship between participation in social associations or organizations and political participation among Thai citizens after controlling for demographic characteristics; and (3) to propose some policy recommendations aimed at fostering participation in social associations or organizations in order to develop democracy in Thailand. Using the Asian Barometer survey data in 2010 and statistics analysis as a main data and technique, it was found that age, education attainment, family income, and domicile statistically associated with engagement in social associations (p<.001). In addition, after controlling for demographic characteristics, participation in social associations did have influence on political participation (p<.001). The results revealed that those living in rural area, and having low income and low level of education tend to participate more in social associations. The results also indicated a democratic development problem in the country, as those who did not participate much in politics were likely to be the haves. To remedy the situation, the Thai government should initiate social engagement projects among people in urban area and empower the existing social associations.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
พรชัย ตระกูลวรานนท์. (2549). ทุนทางสังคมและแบบแผนการมีส่วนร่วมทางการเมืองของภาคประชาชน.กรุงเทพ: สถาบันสัญญาธรรมศักดิ์ มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์.
โรเบิร์ต อัลบริททัน และ ถวิลวดี บุรีกุล.(2554). บทบาทของประชาสังคมที่มีต่อการเมืองในด้านการเลือกตั้งของประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพ: สถาบันพระปกเกล้า.
เอนก นาคบุตร. (2545). ทุนทางสังคม และประชาสังคมในเมืองไทย. กรุงเทพ: สํานักงานกองทุนเพื่อสังคม.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Tocqueville, A. (2000 trans.). Democracy in America. New York: Bantam Books.
Eggert, N, & Giugni, M. (2010). Does Associational Involvement Spur Political Integration?: Political Interest and Participation of Three Immigrant Groups in Zurich. Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 175-210.
Ikeda, K., & Richey, S.E. (2005). Japanese Network Capital: The Impact of Social Networks on Japanese Political Participation. Political Behavior, 27(3), 239-60.
Kosic, A. (2007). Motivation for Civic Participation of Immigrants: The Role of Personal Resources, Social Identities, and Personal Traits. Oldenburg: Interdisciplinary Centre for Education and Communication in Migration Processes.
Lee, A.R. (2010). The Quality of Social Capital and Political Participation in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10, 483-505.
Lee, A.R., & Glasure, Y.U. (2007). Social Capital and Political Participation in South Korea. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 34(2), 101-18.
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowing Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 6(1), 65-78.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L.,Verba, S., & Brady, H. (2009). The Internet and Civic Engagement: TheCurrent State of Civic Engagement in America. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.