China's Modernization Approach: A Genuine Break from the Past or a Repackaging of familiar Developmental Discourse for African States?

Main Article Content

Abiodun Adiat
Kayode Olawoyin

บทคัดย่อ

Many new states in the developing world after their independence adopted the western modernization approach which focuses on liberal democracy and capitalism as a panacea to their problem of low industrial productivity and underdevelopment. However, several decades after, the western modernization approach has not been able to bring about much development to the poor countries of the global south. Against this background, this article with the use of in-depth interviews and secondary   materials examines the credibility of the Chinese modernization approach as a viable alternative to development  in developing countries. Specifically, it examines the basis of the Chinese modernization approach and also investigates the extent to which the approach is a credible alternative to the western modernization approach. It also examines the significant differences in the Chinese and western modernization model. The findings of the study reveal that the Chinese developmental model offers  a lot of significant innovations to African states which makes it to be a credible alternative developmental model to the western modernization model. This is because it demonstrates the importance of state led developmental approach for a developing country in need of development. In spite of this significance, the Chinese model is not a fit for all system, hence it recommends that African states learns from the Chinese experience and evolve a system that fits their needs based on lessons leant from the model.


 

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Adiat, A., & Olawoyin, K. (2025). China’s Modernization Approach: A Genuine Break from the Past or a Repackaging of familiar Developmental Discourse for African States?. Journal of Politics and Governance, 15(3), 1–15. สืบค้น จาก https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jopag/article/view/282588
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Adrain, C. F. (1994). Comparative political systems: Policy performance and social change. M. E. Sharpe Publications.

Amsden, A. A. (2009). A ascensão do ‘resto’: Os desafios ao ocidente de economias com industrialização tardia. Editora UNESP Publications.

Ash, T. G. (2008, September 11). China, Russia and the new world disorder. The Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ash11-2008sep11,0,5312908. story

Awofeso, O., & Udokang, J. C. (2015). Political ideas: An introduction. MaGrace Publishers.

Brautigam, D. (2020). A critical look at China's ‘debt trap diplomacy’; Rise of a meme. Area Development Policy, 5(1), 1–14.

Bubaker, F. S. (2015). Theories of development. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(1).

Burky, D. F. (2002). Communism in history and theory: From utopian socialism to the fall of the Soviet Union. Greenwood Publishing.

Callick, R. (2007). How long can economic freedom and political repression coexist? Rowan Callick examines Beijing’s sinister policy formulation. The American: The Journal of American Enterprise Institute. http://www.american.com/archive/2007/november-december-magazinecontents/the-china-model

Chen, L., & Naughton, B. (2016). A dynamic China model: The co-evolution of economics and politics in China. Journal of Contemporary China. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564. 2016.1206278

Cohan, U. W. (2017). What is One Belt One Road? A surplus recycling mechanism approach. https://www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3.html

Cookie, C. (Ed.). (1998). Dictionary of historical terms (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan Publisher.

Christoph, N. (2022). Countries of the Road and Belt Initiative. Shanghai: Green Finance and Development Center, FISF Fudan University.

Dari, T., & Oyuna, B. (2014). The Chinese model of modernization – Nature, historical stages, sociocultural characteristics. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 670–674.

De Barry, W. T. (1989). Neo-Confucian education: The formative stage. University of California Press.

Drinhausen, K. (2023). Democracy: Decoding China. https://www.decodingchina.eu/democracy.html

Golden, S. (2006). The modernization of China and the Chinese critique of modernity. Revista HMiC, IV.

Heywood, A. (2003). Political ideologies: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.

Hickel, J. (2020, November 26). Apartheid in the World Bank and IMF. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2020/11/26/it-is-time-to-decolonise-the-world-bank-and-the-imf.html

Hou, X. (2014). Dissecting China’s rise: Controversies over the China model. China Perspectives. http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/6484

Hurley, J., Morris, S., & Portelance, G. (2018). Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective. Center for Global Development. http://www.cgdev.org/publication/examining-debt-implications-belt-and-road-initiative-a-policy-perspective.html

Jiang, G. H. (2023). The imperial mode of China: An analytical reconstruction of Chinese economic history. In Springer (pp. 255–304).

Kennedy, S. (2010). The myth of Beijing consensus. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 461–477.

Liu, S., & Xiong, X. (2023). The Chinese path to modernization: Its universality and uniqueness. Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 11(1), 1–16.

Martinussen, J. (1997). State, society, and market: A guide to competing theories of development. Atlantic Highlands Publishers.

Momoh, Z. (2023). The Bretton Wood institutions and the quest for development in Africa. Otoritas: Jurnal Pemerintahan, 13(2).

Monyani, M. (2018, May 25). One party state: Is it good or bad for governance. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/05/25/one-party-state-is-it-good-or-bad-for-governance.html

Morgan, V. J. (2015). Marxism-Leninism: The ideology of twentieth century communism. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.

Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Cambridge University Press.

Naughton, B. (2010). China’s distinctive system: Can it be a model for others? Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 437–460.

National People’s Congress. (2019). Constitution of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.npc.gov.cn/emglishnpc/constituion 2019/201911/1f65146fb6104dd3a2793875d19b5b29.shtml

Nolen, J. L. (2023). History and societies: Collectivism. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/pan-Africanism.html

Ononihu, S. C., & Okonkwo, C. N. (2018). Washington Consensus and African development conundrum: Nigerian experience, 2012–2016. South East Journal of Political Science, 4(1).

Qinglin, J. (2013). The development of socialist consultative democracy in China. Qiushi Journal, 5(1).

Ramo, J. C. (2004). Beijing consensus: Notes on the new physics of Chinese power. Foreign Policy Center.

Reyes, G. E. (2001). Four main theories of development: Modernization, dependency, world-systems, and globalization. NÓMADAS, 4, 1–12.

Salaam, N. F., & Usman, A. S. (2015). Rudiments of government and politics. Concept Publications Limited.

Shambaugh, D. (2000). The modern Chinese state. Cambridge University Press.

Shen, L., & Ren, Z. (2023). Study on Chinese-style modernization for the common prosperity of all people. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4(3).

Song, Y. (2015, April 25). 四项基本原则从提出到写入宪法 [Four cardinal principles from proposal to incorporation into the constitution]. People’s Daily. http://dangshi.people. com.cn/n/2015/0425/c8503726903076.html

Vadell, J., Ramos, L., & Neves, P. (2014). The international implications of the Chinese model of development in the Global South: Asian consensus as a network power. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57(special edition), 91–107.

Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened. Institute for International Economics.

World Bank. (2019). Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional/integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative

World Foresight Forum. (2011). The Beijing consensus: An alternative approach to development (Issue Brief No. 02). www.worldforesightforum.org

Yang, G. (2022). The Communist Party of China and the Chinese road to modernization. Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 10(1), 1–8.

Zhang, J., & Zhao, N. (2023). The impact of Chinese-style modernization on the social psychological behaviours of Chinese individuals: Evidence from sociological and psychological research. Journal of Psychology and Developing Societies, 35(2), 324–346.

Zhao, S. (2010). The China model: Can it replace the Western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 419–443.