ASEAN, Food Security, and Land Rights: Enlarging a Democratic Space for Public Services in the ASEAN
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper revisits and elucidates the relevance of Development Administration and its scion, Comparative Public Administration (CPA) in diagnosing organization and management implications of development problems, specifically landlessness and food security in the Southeast Asian region. Intrinsic to the CPA approach is the need for maintaining relevant connectivity among countries to extract knowledge that can more or less lead to theory. The paper presents a cursory briefing on the ASEAN and a possible multistake holder approach in tackling the hitherto land and food security problems in the region, with the view of connecting the different perspectives by various scholars and practitioners of public administration, including academic / research alliances in the member countries, to carry out a regional engagement. The paper presents a possible regional framework of action for engaging the ASEAN as possible analytical framework in tackling development issues using the lenses of Development Administration and Comparative Public Administration
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) and International Land Coalition (ILC). (2006). Enhancing access of the poor to land and common property resources: A resource book. Quezon City, Philippines and Rome, Italy: ANGOC and ILC.
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bryant, C. (1978). Development administration: Where should we go from here? In S.K. Sharma, Dynamics of Development: An International Perspective. Delhi, India: Concept Publishing Co.,
Caiden, G. (1991). Getting at the essence of the administrative state. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Symposium of the Public Administration Theory Network. George Washington University, Washington, D.C., March 21.
Calton, J. M. and Kurland, N. B. (1994). A Theory of stakeholder enabling: Giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse. In David M. Boje, Robert P. Gephart, Jr., and Tojo Joseph Thatchenkery (Eds.). Postmodern management and organization theory. Thousand Oaks. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Clegg, S. R. and Gray, J.T. (1994). Metaphors of globalization. In David M. Boje, Robert P. Gephart, Jr., and Tojo Joseph Thatchenkery (Eds.). Postmodern management and organization theory. Thousand Oaks. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Chandler, R. C. and Plano, J. C. (1982). The public administration dictionary. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dahl, R.A. (1947). The science of public administration: Three problems. In Public Administration Review, 7( 1 Winter), 11.
FAO, WFP and IFAD. (2012). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. Economic growth is necessary but not sufficient to accelerate reduction of hunger and malnutrition. Rome, FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3027e/i3027e.pdf. Accessed on September 2014.
Food and Agriculture Organization – United Nations. (2014). State of the Food Insecurity in the World (SOFI) 2014. FAO Web portal. http://www.fao.org/publications/sofi/2014/en/. Accessed on September 2014.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R.E. and Gilbert, D.R. (1992). Business ethics and society: A critical agenda. Business & Society, (31), 9-17
Garcia-Zamor, J-C. (April, 1992). Neoteric theories for development administration in the New World Order. Paper presented at the 1992 Annual Conference of the American Society for Public Administration. Chicago.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1988). Remapping the moral domain: New images of self in relationship. In C. Gilliga, J. Ward, & J. Taylor, with B. Bardige (Eds.). Mapping the Moral domain: a contribution of women’s thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 3-19). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
IFAD (2009). Rural poverty in Asia.In Rural poverty portal. http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/region/home/tags/asia. Accessed on September 2014.
ICSW Briefing Paper, November 2001. Downloaded at: http://www.icsw.org/publications/ASEAN-paper.pdf. June 2008.
Jain, R.B. (1991). The state of the study of comparative public administration in India. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, XXXVI( 1), 33.
Jun, J.S. (1976). Renewing the study of comparative administration: some reflections on the current possibilities. Public Administration Review.
Khator, R. (April,1992). Administering the environment in an interdependent world. Paper presented at the 1992 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Chicago.
Klennert, K., (Ed.). (2005). Achieving food and nutrition security, actions to meet the global challenge: A training course reader. Bonn, Germany: InWent Feldafing.
Lopa, C.K.A. (2012). CSOs’ engagement with ASEAN: Perspectives and learnings. In Building bridges and promoting people to people interaction (pp. 54-80). Kathmandu, Nepal: Center for South Asian Studies (CSAS)
Montogomery, J. (1966). A royal invitation: Variations on three classic themes. In Montgomery and William Siffin (Eds.). Approaches to development: Politics, administration and change (p.259). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Montgomery. J. (1966). A royal invitation: variations on three classic themes. In Montgomery and William Siffin (Eds.). Approaches to Development: Politics, Administration and Change (p. 259). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Riggs. F. W. (1970). The context of development administration. In Riggs, F. (Ed.). Frontiers of Development Administration (p. 75). Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Riggs, F.W. (1976). The group and the movement: notes on comparative and development administration. Public Administration Review, 36, 6 (November-December ), 652.
Riggs, F. W. (1994). Global Forces and the Discipline of Public Administration. In Renu Khator and Jean-Claude Garcia-Zamor (Eds.). Public administration in the global village (pp.17-44).
Rillorta, E. (2007). Civil society engagements with the ASEAN. Quezon City: Southeast
Asian Committee for Advocacy (SEACA).
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation, social theory, and global culture. London: Sage.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosenau, P.M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stone, D.C. (1965). Government machinery necessary for development. In M. Kriesberg (Ed.). Public administration in developing countries (p.53). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Wicks, A.C., Gilbert, D.R., & Freeman, R.E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 475-497.
ASEAN Websites:
ASEAN Charter
thASEANSummitPrimerwww.12thaseansummit.org.ph/downloads/ASEANPrimer.pdf(Accessed June 2007)
th ASEAN Summit Meeting , 18-22 November 2007, http://www.aseansec.org/21093.htm (Accessed June 2007)
Ministerial Understanding on ASEAN Cooperation in Rural Development and Poverty Eradication
Hanoi Plan of Action, http://www.aseansec.org
ASEAN Vision 2020
Bali Concord II
Minutes of the 12th ASEAN Summit Meeting
• Minutes of the 13th ASEAN Summit Meeting
• ASEAN Declaration on Environment and Sustainability
• Vientiane Action Program
• Joint Declaration on the ASEAN-Australia Comprehensive Partnership (Manila, Philippines, on 1 August 2007
• ASEAN-Japan Plan of Action