Policy recommendations for sustainable urban development of Khon Kaen Municipality, Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this research is to provide policy recommendations for the sustainable urban development of Khon Kaen Municipality. The research methodology employs a qualitative approach utilizing a selective sampling method, which includes interviewees from four diverse sectors: government agencies, civil society, educational institutions, and the industry/ private sector. A total of eight informants participated in the study. The research focuses on three key components; smart city initiatives, network partnerships, and administration—as variables contributing to sustainable urbanization. The result from a study identified three key dimensions crucial for the sustainability of cities: firstly, building Sustainable Urbanization by Becoming a Smart City. Leveraging smart technologies is essential for improving residents' quality of life. This involves enhancing public services and urban infrastructure through digital solutions, such as optimizing transportation systems, energy consumption, and waste management. Secondly, building Sustainable Urbanization with Network Partnership. Fostering community engagement is vital for social cohesion and economic resilience. This includes supporting local businesses, creating innovation hubs, and organizing activities that bring residents together. Building strong community networks enhances social ties and economic opportunities. Lastly, Building a Sustainable City through Administration. Effective management of natural and economic resources is crucial for long—term sustainability. Administrative strategies should promote awareness about environmental conservation, optimize resource usage, and implement policies that ensure sustainable urban development. While, Administrations should focus on the optimal allocation and utilization of resources to create a harmonious and responsible urban society. Furthermore, organizing educational activities to raise awareness about natural resource management and promoting social and community events to strengthen relationships are key for preparing the urban population for future challenges. This structured approach aligns with existing research on sustainable urban development, emphasizing the integration of smart city technologies, community engagement through network partnerships, and efficient administration as pillars for building sustainable cities.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ahvenniemi, H.-S. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
Athit, P. (2023). Administration and sustainable development affecting the quality of life of people in Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Journal of Nakhon Ratchasima College of Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(1), 316-316.
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
Dusitnanon, A. (2019). Architects Association turning Thailand into a smart city leader. Bangkok. Retrieved September 3, 2023, from https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/85385
Gammelgard, M., Kramar, H., & Strohmayer, F. (2007). An IT management assessment framework: Evaluating enterprise architecture scenarios. Information Systems and Business Management.
Giffinger, R., Kramar, H., Haindlmaier, G., & Strohmayer, F. (2014). Smart cities – European smart cities 3.0. Vienna. Retrieved September 3, 2023, from http://www.smart-cities.eu/?cid=2&ver=3
Giffinger, R., & Gurdum, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of cities. AEC: Architecture, City and Environment, 4(12), 7-25.
Kaewthep, K. (1995). Community cultural approach work tools. Mind Publishing.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149.
Malandrino, O., Sica, D., & Supino, S. (2019). The role of public administration in sustainable urban development: Evidence from Italy. Smart Cities, 2(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2010006
Mitchell, J. C. (Ed.). (1969). Social networks in urban situations: Analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns. Manchester University Press.
Nimngern, S. (2020). What is a smart city and how will it come about? Bangkok. Retrieved September 3, 2023, from https://www.engineeringtoday.net
Panichcherienkit, D. (2019). Sustainable municipality management in Phuket Province. Suratthani Rajabhat Journal, 6(1), 143-162.
Patrose, L. (2023). Role of public-private partnerships in developing sustainable cities: Framework, opportunities, mechanisms. International Journal of Innovations and Interdisciplinary Research, 1(1), 1-15.
Phanupong, M. (2022). Smart city development: A case study of Kashiwa-no-ha City, Japan. Faculty of Arts, Silpakorn University.
Pongpit, S. (2005). Tactical networks for strong congregations, strong communities. Institute Promote Business.
Pongsak, S., Sunthorn, A., & Natthanicha, W. (2021). Principles of management and sustainable development of Thai society. Journal of Mahachula Tani Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, 3(6), 33-41.
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Macmillan.
Sumalee, E., & Tanchai, C. (2019). Smart city: Basic concepts and operating systems for cities in the digital age. King Prajadhipok's Institute.
Tempermupun, S., et al. (2020). Success factors affecting smart city development in the People’s Republic of China: A case study of Shanghai. Ayutthaya: Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under the Royal Patronage.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883-898.
Voraprot, K. (2016). The relationship between community management and sustainable development and the implementation of the concept of sufficiency economy in people's daily lives: A case study of Bo Thong Subdistrict, Bo Thong District, Chonburi Province. College of Commerce, Burapha University.