Thailand’s Climate Change Governance from the Polycentric and Zero-Emissions Society Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Thailand’s climate change governance is assessed on the basis of the polycentric and the Climate Action Tracker (CAT) framework. This framework is a systematic approach to understanding current climate change governance and considers the aspects of key enabling factors for effective climate actions towards a zero emissions society. The results show that, over the last two decades Thailand has continually developed important elements of governance architecture to better manage climate change challenges. The orientation of Thailand’s climate change governance has been steadily reformulated to move towards a polycentric mode, with diverse instruments formulated, cross - scale institutional arrangements and linkages established, multi - level actors, and different kinds of knowledge produced. One of Thailand’s polycentric governance developments is a proactive engagement of public and private actors to enable more effective management of climate change. An additional CAT - based analysis consistently highlights that Thailand has advanced political commitments towards a zero - emissions society. Much progress can also be seen for the elements related to policy processes and stakeholder engagement, but the institutional framework regulating Thailand’s governmental and ministerial processes for effective climate action is still weak. To advance towards more polycentric governance, Thailand should make efforts to focus on further strengthening existing mechanisms for climate change responses in the Paris Agreement (PA) regime, especially encouraging institutional reform and enhancing central - to - local coordination and decision - making processes. Moreover, stronger engagement of local - level actors provides a great opportunity to enhance polycentric governance and improve climate change responses at the front line.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Allen, M. R., et al. (2018). Framing and Context. In Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds), Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, 1 (pp.49-92). Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10. 1017/9781009157940
Arriagada, R., et al. (2018). Climate change governance in the anthropocene: emergence of polycentrism in Chile. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 68(6), 1-13.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Climate Action Tracker. (2021). Climate governance series: Methodology note. https://climateactiontracker. org/documents/865/2021-08_CAT_ ClimateGovernance_MethodologyNote.pdf
Climate Action Tracker. (2019a). Climate governance series: Australia. https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/653/ 2019-08-30_CAT_ ClimateGovernance_Australia.pdf
Climate Action Tracker. (2019b). Climate governance series: Philippines. https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/ 663/2019-10-31_CAT_Climate Governance_Philippines.pdf
Climate Change Management and Coordination. (2021). Climate Change Management and Coordination. https://climate.onep.go.th/en_US/
Dorsch, M. & Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 45-64.
Fleurbaey M., et al. (2014). Sustainable Development and Equity. In Edenhofer, O., et al. (Eds). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge university press.
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295.
Global Compact Network Thailand. (2022). Global Compact Network Thailand. https://globalcompact-th.com/about/index/2
Green Climate Fund. (2017). NDA nomination letter for Thailand. https://www.greenclimate.fund/document/nda-nomination-letter-thailand
Heinen, D., Arlati, A., & Knieling, J. (2021). Five dimensions of climate governance: a framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(1), 56-68.
Hufty, M. (2011). Investigating policy processes: The Governance Analytical Framework (GAF). Research for Sustainable Development: Foundations, Experiences, and Perspectives, 6, 403-424.
IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1 (pp.3-32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/97810091 57896
IPCC. (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (Eds). Global Warming of 15°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, 1 (pp.3-24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781009157940
Jänicke, M. (2017). The multi-level system of global climate governance -the model and its current state. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27, 108–121.
Limsakul, A., et al. (2019). Updated basis knowledge of climate change summarized from the first part of Thailand’s Second Assessment Report on Climate Change. Applied Environmental Research, 41(2), 1-12.
Melica, G., et al. (2018). Multilevel governance of sustainable energy policies: The role of regions and provinces to support the participation of small local authorities in the Covenant of Mayors. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 729-739.
Melica, G., et al. (2018). Multilevel governance of sustainable energy policies: The role of regions and provinces to support the participation of small local authorities in the Covenant of Mayors. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 729-739.
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2020a). Thailand Third Biennial Update Report. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/BUR3_Thailand_251220%20.pdf
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2020b). Thailand’s Updated Nationally Determined Contribution. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/Thailand%20Updated%20NDC.pdf
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2020c). Thailand’s National Adaptation Plan. https://climate.onep.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/NAP.pdf
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2018). Thailand’s Third National Communication. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Thailand%20TNC.pdf
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2015a). Thailand’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC). http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/tha190475.pdf
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2015b). Climate Change Master Plan 2015-2050. https://climate.onep.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CCMP_english.pdf
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L. & Collins, K.M.T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(56), 1-28.
Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 97-134.
Pardoe, J., et al. (2018). Climate change and the water–energy–food nexus: insights from policy and practice in Tanzania. Climate Policy, 18(7), 863-877.
Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 5(1), 1-13.
Romero-Lankao, P., et al. (2018). Governance and policy. In Rosenzweig, C., et al. (eds), Climate Change and Cities: Second Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network, 1(pp.585-606). Cambridge University Press.
Tambunlertchai, K., Vassanadumrongdee, S., & Srethasirote, B. (2015). An Institutional Analysis of Climate Finance in Thailand. Applied Environmental Research, 37(2), 59-74.
Thai Climate Justice Working Group. (2022). Thai Climate Justice Working Group. http://www. thaiclimatejustice.org/about
Thai PBS World. (2021). Thailand vows to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2065 at COP26. https://www. thaipbsworld.com/thailand-vows-to-reach-net-zero-carbon-emissions-by-2065-at-cop26/
Thailand Business News. (2021). Thailand’s Stock Exchange (SET) continues 2nd year of project to tackle global warming. https://www.thailand-business news.com/set/82816-thailands-stock-exchange-set-continues-2nd-year-of-care-the-whale-project-with-alliances-to-tackle-global-warming.html
Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization). (2021). Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization. http://www.tgo.or. th/2020/index.php/th/
The Nation Thailand. (2021). Prayut shows off Thailand’s climate achievements at COP26. https://www.nationthailand.com/in-focus/40008298
United Nations. (2021). Thailand Mid-century, Long-term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Thailand_LTS1.pdf
United Nations Children's Fund. (2020). What is climate governance? UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/lac/media/19651/file/what-is-climate-governance.pdf
United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris _agreement.pdfUnited Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_ paris_agreement.pdf.
United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement. https://unfccc. int/sites/default/files/english_paris_ agreement.pdf
United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf