The Possibility of Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) System for Inquiry Officials to Analyze the Primary Consideration System under Judicial System in Thailand

Main Article Content

Wannipa Koosela
Sillaphakhom Eamwong

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to study the possibility of the application of an artificial intelligence (AI) system for inquiry officials to analyze the primary consideration system under judicial in Thailand. The research has based on qualitative research method with secondary data was collected from the academic sources in the relevant issues. Primary data has collected with a semi-structured interview and focus group discussions from the experts and relevant persons. After that, data has analyzed by the content analysis method. The results showed that: the possibility of development for an artificial intelligence (AI) system is flexible for decision making that may support and promote the consistency level and efficiency for case consideration. If AI is developed and applied, it may adjust flexibility, accuracy, and efficiency for document drafting regarding any case considerations. Besides, perception or demand on artificial intelligence (AI) system is a factor that improves performances and affects the personnel's behavior and system development for supporting the inquiry officials' decision. It is suitable and necessary to develop guidelines for applying artificial intelligence (AI) systems for inquiry officials to analyze the primary consideration system under a judicial system in Thailand. Furthermore, the development process must-have components of knowledge, understanding, expertise, and stakeholders' participation focused on the database development of the Royal Thai Police forward the result of a big data system for inquiry officials in a systematic and process.

Article Details

How to Cite
Koosela, W., & Eamwong, S. . (2022). The Possibility of Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) System for Inquiry Officials to Analyze the Primary Consideration System under Judicial System in Thailand. Journal of Politics and Governance, 12(3), 35–50. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jopag/article/view/247248
Section
Research Articles

References

นิศา ชูโต. (2548.) การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ Qualitative research. กรุงเทพฯ: พริ้นต์โพร.

Deobold B. V. Dalen & William. J. M. (1962). Understanding Educational Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 163-173.

James, O., & Leon, S. (1999). JUSTICE: A Judicial Search Tool Using Intelligent Concept Extraction. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. June 1999, 173-181.

Kouziokas, G. N., and Perakis, K. (2017). Decision support system based on artificial intelligence, GIS and remote sensing for sustainable public and judicial management. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(3), 397-404.

Manager Online. (16 พฤศจิกายน 2560). ศาลจีนใช้หุ่นปัญญาประดิษฐ์ช่วยงานอำนวยยุติธรรม. ผู้จัดการออนไลน์. สืบค้นจาก https://mgronline.com/china /detail/9600000115921.

Nattaphan, S. (2 กรกฎาคม 2562). ล้ำไปอีก! จีนเปิดตัวผู้พิพากษาปัญญาประดิษฐ์เป็นครั้งแรกของโลก. สืบค้นจาก https://www.beartai.com/news/ itnews/339985.

Richard, M. R., and Alicia, S. N,. (2019). Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice. Stanford Technology Law Review, 22, 242-289.

Sartor, G., and Branting, L. K. (1998). Introduction: judicial applications of artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6, 105-110.

Tania, S,. (2018). Judge v. Robot: Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision-Making. UNSWLJ, 41, 1114-1133

Thomas, J.B,. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Court Legitimacy Problems of AI Assistance in the Judiciary. Retskraft–Copenhagen Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 41-59.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press, New York, 87-88.