Firm Performance and Corporate Sustainability Performance Management: The Mediating Effect of Investors’ Reliability towards Companies listed on the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI)

Main Article Content

Thanet Oonprechavanich

Abstract

     This research aimed to analyze direct and indirect effects of variables influencing the corporate sustainability performance management. The model consisted of 3 latent variables, namely firms’ performance as cause variable, investors’ reliability as mediator variable, and the effect variable as the corporate sustainability performance management of companies listed on the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). This research was the survey research testing 125 respondents from entrepreneurs in Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). The research samples were obtained from stratified random sampling. The data was collected by questionnaire. In this study, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique was used for hypothesis testing. According to the analysis found that (1) the firm’s performance had a direct effect on the investors’ reliability and the corporate sustainability performance management of companies listed on MAI were equal to 0.820 and 0.311 respectively (2) the investors’ reliability had a direct effect on the corporate sustainability performance management of companies listed on MAI was equal to 0.595 and (3) the firm’s performance had indirect effect on the corporate sustainability performance management of companies listed on MAI by passing through the investors’ reliability was equal to 0.488.


Article history: Received 10 March 2023    


                           Revised 25 April 2023


                           Accepted 27 April 2023      


                           SIMILARITY INDEX = 3.39 %.....................

Article Details

How to Cite
Oonprechavanich, T. (2023). Firm Performance and Corporate Sustainability Performance Management: The Mediating Effect of Investors’ Reliability towards Companies listed on the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). Journal of Management Science Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, 10(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.14456/jmsnpru.2023.11
Section
Research Articles

References

haiPublica. (2020). 45 ปีตลาดหลักทรพย์ฯ “มุ่งพัฒนาตลาดทุน เพื่อทุกคน” อย่างยั่งยืน. [ออนไลน์]. ค้นเมื่อ 20 มกราคม 2565 จาก https://thaipublica.org/2020/04/45-years-set-native-ad/.

ตลาดหลักทรัพย์ เอ็ม เอ ไอ. (2565). โครงสร้างการจัดกลุ่มอุตสาหกรรมในตลาดหลักทรัพย์ เอ็ม เอ ไอ. [ออนไลน์]. ค้นเมื่อ 22 มกราคม 2565 จาก https://www.set.or.th/mai/th/company/

industry_group_p1.html.

Abdioglu, N. (2020). The Role of Corporate Sustainability on Firm Value: An Application on Borsa Istanbul. In Handbook of Research on Creating Sustainable Value in the Global Economy (pp. 203-220). IGI Global.

Alvino, F., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., and Palladino, R. (2020). Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 76-94.

Amiraslani, H., Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2022). Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 1-42.

Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., and Huiskonen, J. (2017). Understanding the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainability performance in manufacturing firms in Pakistan. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 768-777.

Bajo, E., Croci, E., and Marinelli, N. (2020). Institutional investor networks and firm value. Journal of Business Research, 112, 65-80.

Baker, M., and Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of economic perspectives, 21(2), 129-152.

Bananuka, J., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Kaawaase, T. K., Mindra, R. K., and Kayongo, I. N. (2022). Sustainability performance disclosures: the impact of gender diversity and intellectual capital on GRI standards compliance in Uganda. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. Retrieved January 28, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-09-2021-0301.

Barbier, E. B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental conservation, 14(2), 101-110.

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

Black, E. L., Carnes, T. A., and Richardson, V. J. (2000). The market valuation of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1), 31-42.

Cooper, L. A., and Weber, J. (2021). Does Benefit Corporation status matter to investors? An exploratory study of investor perceptions and decisions. Business and Society, 60(4), 979-1008.

Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper and Row.

Dakhlallh, M. M., Rashid, N., Abdullah, W. A. W., Qawqzeh, H. K., and Dakhlallh, A. M. (2020). Accrual-based Earnings Management, Real Earnings Management and Firm Performance: Evidence from Public Shareholders Listed Firms on Jordanian's Stock Market. Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(1), 16-27.

Feola, R., Vesci, M., Marinato, E., and Parente, R. (2021). Segmenting “digital investors”: Evidence from the Italian equity crowdfunding market. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1235-1250.

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, 122-126.

Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., and Kazmi, A. A. (2013). Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: Literature review and future research agenda. Management Decision, 51(2), 361-379.

Gumbus, A., and Lussier, R. N. (2006). Entrepreneurs use a balanced scorecard to translate strategy into performance measures. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 407-425.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.

(7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hoque, Z. (2005). Linking environmental uncertainty to non-financial performance measures and performance: a research note. The British Accounting Review, 37(4), 471-481.

Jan, A. A., Lai, F. W., Draz, M. U., Tahir, M., Ali, S. E. A., Zahid, M., and Shad, M. K. (2021). Integrating sustainability practices into islamic corporate governance for sustainable firm performance: from the lens of agency and stakeholder theories. Quality and Quantity, 1-24.

Javed, M., Rashid, M. A., Hussain, G., and Ali, H. Y. (2020). The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1395-1409.

Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (2005). Creating the office of strategy management. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

Kopecka, N. (2015). The balanced scorecard implementation, integrated approach and the quality of its measurement. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 59-69.

Kumar, P., and Firoz, M. (2022). Does Accounting-based Financial Performance Value Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures? A detailed note on a corporate sustainability perspective. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(1), 1-33.

Laskar, N., and Maji, S. G. (2018). Disclosure of corporate sustainability performance and firm performance in Asia. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(4), 414-443.

Maharantika, S. F., and Fuad, F. (2022). The Influence of Environmental Performance, Environment Management Systems, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Financial Performance. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11(1), 1-15.

Mio, C., Costantini, A., and Panfilo, S. (2022). Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 29(2), 367-384.

Mishra, A., and Mishra, D. (2013). Applications of stakeholder theory in information systems and technology. Engineering Economics, 24(3), 254-266.

Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117727.

Nair, S., Gopikumar, V., Viswanathan, P. K., Gopakumar, S., and Gil, M. T. (2020). A contingency model of board characteristics and foreign institutional investor ownership: the moderating role of firm size and market valuation. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1739465.

Nasifoglu Elidemir, S., Ozturen, A., and Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3295.

Neely, A., Kennerley, M., and Adams, C. (2007). Performance measurement frameworks: a review. Business Performance Measurement, 143-162.

Nikolaou, I. E., Tsalis, T. A., and Evangelinos, K. I. (2019). A framework to measure corporate sustainability performance: A strong sustainability-based view of firm. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 1-18.

Nugroho, T. W., Hanani, N., Toiba, H., and Sujarwo, S. (2022). Promoting Subjective Well-Being among Rural and Urban Residents in Indonesia: Does Social Capital Matter?. Sustainability, 14(4), 2375.

Obamuyi, T. M. (2013). Factors influencing investment decisions in capital market: A study of individual investors in Nigeria. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 141-161.

Rovinelli, R. J., and Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49-60.

Roxas, B. (2021). Environmental sustainability engagement of firms: The roles of social capital, resources, and managerial entrepreneurial orientation of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2194-2208.

Sari, A. W., Alfiany, N., Hesti, A. N., and Nisa, A. Z. (2022). The Application of a Balanced Scorecard in SME: A case Study of Milanzo Kids. KEUNIS, 10(1), 56-65.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., and Muller H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and goodness-of-fit models. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.

Singer, S. J., and EDMONDSON, A. (2008). When Learning and Performance are at Odds: Confronting the Tension Chapter. Learning and performance matter, 33-58.

Van Riel, C. B., and Fombrun, C. J. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. London: Routledge.

Wahyudin, A., Sari, M. P., Ardiansari, A., Raharja, S., and Kalbuana, N. (2021). Instrument design of small industry performance measurement in Semarang city with balanced scorecard concept. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(3), 1-9.

Wang, Y., and Zhao, D. (2021). Research on the Evaluation Index System of Trust, Innovation and MandA Value. In International Symposium on Automation, Information and Computing (ISAIC 2020) 2-4 December 2020, Beijing, 1828(012178).

Yamane, Taro. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. (3rd ed). New York: Harper and Row Publications.