Success of the Project Administration to Enhance the Village Potential According to the Civil State Policy.

Abstract

                The objectives of this study were threefold: 1) to compare the effectiveness of enhancing the village potential according to the Civil State policy; 2) to compare the problem and obstacles springing from the project administration concerning the enhancement of the village potential to drive the fundamental economy according to the Civil State policy; and 3) to seek guidelines for use in streamlining the project administration.
                 The study was qualitative in character. 60 key informants comprised the sample of the study. They included the following persons: deputy chiefs of district offices, “kamnan” or village headman, and some villagers of high caliber. The collected data were analyzed by using the content analysis.
                 The data analysis has shell light on the following facts: driving the fundamental economy brought about the people’s participation in solving the villages’ problems, in sharing ideas, in working together to craft various projects; all activities were supervised by community leader or official leaders; the leaders played a dominant part in making recommendations, creating new ideas, providing useful data for use in decision making, as well as creating volunteering – mind. In addition, people or government officials directly responsible for the projects would make final decisions in carrying out the most useful projects after they had exchanged views and ideas with the villagers and all stakeholders. It was noteworthy that community members or villagers were highly prepared for the operation of various projects according to the Civil State policy despite the time constraints; they expedited currying out all the projects until completion notably the projects that had been planned in advance. Furthermore, the community members or villagers were fully prepared for forming groups in a voluntary fashion. By so doing, they were in a better position to express their views and ideas about the policies and projects that were most likely to be of great benefit to their localities.

Article history : Received 3 June 2019
                              Revised 16 June 2019
                              Accepted 18 June 2019
                              SIMILARITY INDEX = 0.00 %