An analysis of speech perception test result: a comparison of using accuracy and d’

Main Article Content

Thanasak Sirikenerat

Abstract

Signal Detection Theory (SDT) uses mathematical methods to analyze human decision quality. Some research on speech perception applies SDT to analyze speech perception test results. More precisely, some speech perception researchers use only d’ (a value calculated based on SDT) and some use only accuracy in their analysis. However, it is unknown if using only d’ and only accuracy lead to different research results. In the present study, speech perception test data from five research studies were used to calculate d’ and accuracy separately, and then compare results statistically. The data revealed that using either d’ or accuracy do not make significant differences in terms of inferential statistical analysis. A study involving a larger pool of people studied would improve reliability. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sirikenerat, T. (2022). An analysis of speech perception test result: a comparison of using accuracy and d’. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 23(2), 85–103. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JHUMANS/article/view/258496
Section
Research Articles

References

Christine, K. (1998). An investigation into the relatioship between speech perceptio and speech production in an experimental speech training program for children with hearing loss. [Doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York].

Holderman, G. (2015). The accuracy of the Spanish Words in Noise (S-WIN) speech perception test in bilingual populations. [Bachelor of Arts thesis, University of Florida].

Huang, Y., & Ferreira, F. (2020). The application of Signal Detection Theory to acceptability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 31, 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073

Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., K, Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, b47-b57.

Iversona, P., & Kuhl, P., K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of Acoustical Aociety of America, 97(1), 553-62.

Li, Y. (2015). Audio-visual training effect on L2 perception and production of English /θ/-/s/ and /ð/-/z/ by Mandarin speakers. [Doctoral, dissertation, Newcastal University].

Macmillan, N., A. (2002). Signal Dection Theory. In J. Wixed (Ed.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Macmillan, N., A, & Creelman, C., Douglas. (2005). Detection Theory: A User's Guide (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

McNicol, D. (1972). A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. Australasian Publishing.

Moseley, P., Smailes, D., Ellison, A., & Fernyhough, C. (2016). The effect of auditory verbal imagery on signal detection in hallucination-prone individuals. Cognition, 146, 206–216.

Pastore, R., E, & Scheirer, C., J. (1974). Signal Detection Theory: considerations for general application. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 945-958.

Phillips, V., L, Saks, M., J, & Peterson, J., L. (2001). The application of signal detection theory to decision-making in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(2), 294-308.

Phuangcharoen, W. (1993). Speech perception ability of the persons who loss the high frequency. [Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University].

Rader, T., Adel, Y., Fastl, H., & Baumann, U. (2015). Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation: a simulation and model comparison. Ear and hearing, 36(6), e314-325.

Sirikanerat, T. (2017). The effect of F0 variation on the learning of Japanese pitch accent: a case study of Chinese speakers. [Doctoral disseration, Tohoku University]. Tohoku University Repository. https://tohoku.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=124353&item_no=1&page_id=33&block_id=46.

Sirikanerat, T. & Sugaya, N. (2014). The effect of pitch variation in Japanese pitch accent on L2 learners: A pilot study. Proceedings of the 28th General Meeting of The Phonetic Society of Japan, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology Koganei Campus, Tokyo, 27-28 September (pp. 111-116).

Sirikanerat, T. & Sugaya, N. (2016). Difficulties in the perception of Japanese pitch accent by Thai learners using discrimination paradigm: The effects of accent type and multi-talker variation (in Japanese). Bulletin of Institute for Excellence in Higher Education, Tohoku University, 63-74.

Strange, W., & Shafer, V., L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: the re-education of selective perception. In J. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. John Benjamins Publishing.