Avoidance Strategies to Answer the Question for Image Presentation Concerning their Ending the Relationship Used by Performers.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study the avoidance strategies of performers to answer the questions, the relation between avoidance strategies in answering the questions and presenting self-images and the relation between self-images that the performers present and social values in case the performers end the relationship with their lovers via internet. Eleven clips with length of 2 hours of performers who answered the questions about breaking up with their lovers are from year 2017 and 2018 which have been found in database of www.youtube.com were studied, the turn-taking was found at 289 times. The researcher analyzed the research data by applying the Cooperative Principle of Paul H. Grice, concept of images and concept of Thai social value.
The research results are found that the performers used the avoidance strategies to answer the questions in case of breaking up by not following the Cooperative Principle in conversations that are Violating a maxim, Flouting a maxim, and Opting out a maxim. In addition, the performers used those avoidance strategies to present their self-images that
Regarding the relation between avoidance strategies in answering the questions and presenting self-images, it is found that the performers used avoidance strategies by not following the Cooperative Principle to present their self-images which conform to Thai social values. These values seem like the rule which controls the member of the society. When the images of the performers are in conformity with these values, the performers will be admired and accepted or supported for their career progression and job stability in the future.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
language skill for communication]. Bangkok: Sripratum university.
Awakun, W. (2002). phatthana bukkhalikkaphap: theknik lae withikan [Personality development:
techniques and methods]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn university.
Chinwikai, W. (2003). khwammai priap “na” priapthiap phasa thai kap phasa yi pun [A
Comparative Study of Face-Related Figurative Language in Thai and Japanese]. Master’s
thesis, Thammasat University.
Grice, Paul H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (Eds.) Studies in
Syntax and semantics III (pp. 41 – 58). New York: Academic Press.
Hongladarom, K. & Choksuwanit, Th. (2008). watjana patibat sat [Pragmatics]. Bankgkok:
Chulalongkorn university.
Jaichansukkit, Ph. (2005). phalang haeng phaplak [Image is power]. Bangkok: Than media
network.
Nantachantoon, S. (1997). radap phasa khong phasa phut lae phasa khian [Level of Spoken
and Written language]. 361661 Spoken and Written language. Bangkok: Kasetsart
University.
Phaithayawat, S. (1995). phuenthan watthanatham thai: naeothang kan anurak lae kan
phatthana [Thai culture: Guidelines for Conservation and Development]. Bangkok:
Rajabhat Institute Council.
Phajit, B. (2006). prapheni watthanatham thai lae khati khwamchuea [Thai culture, traditions and
beliefs]. Bangkok: Odeon store.
Rong, Chen. (2001). “Self politeness: A proposal.” Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1): 87 – 106.
Vivattananukun, M. (2002). lakkan samphat nai wongkan borihan kan suesanmuanchon lae kan
wichai [Interviewing principles in management, mass communication and research].
Bankgkok: Chulalongkorn university.
Wannaprasert, Ch. (1979). sangkhom thai [Thai Society]. Bangkok: Prae Pittaya.
Wongmontha, S. (1998). Kan Prachasamphan: Thruesadi Lae Patibat [Public relations: theory and practice]. Bangkok: Thira Film.