Intellectual Property policy for Higher Educational Institution in Thailand

Main Article Content

Watsaporn Arayaphan


In intellectual-property society, intellectual property plays an important role as a foundation of economic development. Being the place for knowledge and research findings, universities need to have effective intellectual property management, so that the further utilization and development of these properties can fairly achieved. The important factor for achieving this goal is having policies on intellectual property management that are relevant to the context and the mission of universities. To create good policies, it requires cooperation among executives, staffs, and students. Moreover, the made policies must be practical.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arayaphan, W. (2020). Intellectual Property policy for Higher Educational Institution in Thailand. Journal of Human Sciences, 21(2), 176-197. Retrieved from
Academic Articles


Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9). 1160-1173.
Carter, H., Snyder, C., & Imre, A. (2007). Library Faculty Publishing and Intellectual Property Issues: A survey of Attitudes and Awareness. Libraries and the Academy, 7(1). 65-79.
Chareonwongsak, K. (2007). The 5th Wave, Social Philosophy, Desirable Society in 21st Century. Bangkok: Success Media.
Clausen, H. (2004). Intellectual property, the internet and the libraries. New Library World, 105(1206/1207). 417-422.
Dai, Y., Popp, D., & Bretschneider, S. (2005). Institutions and intellectual property: the influence of institutional forces on university patenting. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(3). 579-598.
Downing, D. B. (2005). Academic Freedom as Intellectual Property: When Collegiality Confronts the Standardization Movement. Symploke, 13(1-2). 56-79.
Fine, C. R., & Castagnera, J. O. (2003). Should there be corporate concern?: Examining American university intellectual property policies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1). 49-60.
Fiscal Policy Research Institute. (2006). Final Report of Procurement for the Consultants of National Master Plan of Intellectual for Free Trade Negotiation. Bangkok: Fiscal Policy Research Institute.
Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and the Management of Intellectual Property. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hemaratchata, C. (2001). Characteristics of Intellectual Property Laws. Bangkok: P.J. Plate Processor.
Howkins, J. (2013). Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Idea. London: Penguin Books.
Intellectual Property Department. (2010). What is Intellectual Property. Retrieved from
Intellectual Property Office. (2007). Intellectual asset management for universities. Oxford: Intellectual Property Office.
Kelley, K. B., & McMichael, J. S. (2002). Intellectual Property, Ownership and Digital Course Materials : A Study of Intellectual Property Policies at Two-and Four-Year Colleges and Universities. Libraries and the Academy, 2(2). 255-266.
Kelley, K.B., Bonner, K., McMichael, J.S., & Pomea, N. (2002). Intellectual property, ownership and digital course material: a study of intellectual policies at two and four year colleges and university. Libraries and the Academy, 2(2). 255-266.
Khademi, T., & Ismail, K. B. (2013). Commercialization success factors of university research and development commercialization capability. Production & Manufacturing Research An Open Access Journal, 2(1). 586-602.
Kon, A. (2007). Intellectual Capital Management as Part of Knowledge Management Initiatives at Institutions of Higher Learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2). 181-192.
Kumar, S. & Ellingson, J. (2007). Adaptive IP strategies in China: a tactical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1). 139-158.
Lucibella, C. (2010). File sharing and Ownership of Digital Objects: Intellectual Property According to Kant’s Theory of Possession. Theoretical & Applied Ethics (November 2010), 35-42.
Maesincee, S. (2007). Change of the Globe: New Definition of Wealth = Post knowledge based society. Bangkok: International Vintage.
Matkin, G. W. (1994). Technology transfer and public policy: lessons from a case study. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2). 371-383.
National Reform Steering Assembly. (2016). Report of Economic Reform Steering, National Reform Steering Assembly, Intellectual Property Reformation. Retrieved from
Nelson, R. R. (1990). U.S. Technological leadership: where di d it come from and where did it come from and where did it go?. Research Policy, 19. 119-132.
Nollan, R. (2004). Campus intellectual property policy development. Reference Services Review, 32(1). 31-34.
Office of the Higher Education Commission, the Ministry of Education. (2008). The 2nd Long Term Higher Education Framework, 15 Years (2008-2022). Bangkok: Higher Education Policy Planning, Office of the Higher Education Commission.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2016). 12th National Economic and Social Development Plan, 2017-2021. Retrieved from
Pinyosinwat, J. (2009). Rationale of Rights Protection in Intellectual Property. (Doctor of Laws Thesis, The Faculty of Law, Thammasat University).
Powell, W.W. & Owen-Smith, J. (1998). Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life science. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2). 253-277.
Shimoda, R. (2005). Intellectual Property Management of National University Corporations. International Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Economy and Management, 1. 37-45.
Smith, G. V. (1994). The New Role of Intellectual Property in Commercial Transactions. NY: Wiley.
Tang, P., & Tunzelmann, V. (2000). Management, Governance and Intellectual Property: Electronic Publishing in the UK. Journal of Management and Governance, 4. 299-318.
The Department of Intellectual Property, the Ministry of Commerce. (2017). Annual Report 2018. Bangkok: the Department of Intellectual Property.
The Department of Intellectual Property, the Ministry of Commerce. (2005). Basic Knowledge in Intellectual Property. Bangkok: the Department of Intellectual Property.
The World University Rankings. (2020). World university rankings 2020. Retrieved from ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Titu, M. A., Oprean, C., Stan, S., & Titu, S. (2017). The place and role of intellectual property policies in an advanced scientific research and education university. International conference knowledge-based organization, 1(23). 479-488.
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third wave. United States: Bantam Books.
U.S. News & World Report. (2020). Best global universities rankings. Retrieved from
UNCTAD. (2008). Creative economy report 2008. NY: United Nation.
UNESCO. (2013). Creative economy report 2013 special edition: widening local development pathways. Paris: United Nations/UNDP/UNESCO.
Von, H. (1988). Sources of innovation. NY: Oxford University press.
Wiputhanupong, C. (2009). The Management of Intellectual Property in Thailand University. Sripatum Parithat Journal, Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1). 87-95.
World Intellectual Property Organization (2019c). Database of polices. Retrieved from
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2010). Guidelines on Developing Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and R&D Organizations. Retrieved from
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019a). IP toolkit for universities and PRIs: IP policies. Retrieved from
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019b). Universities and intellectual property. Retrieved from