Language and Ideology in the “Sexually Confused” Consultation Discourse in a Virtual Community

Main Article Content

Pornchai Techa
Panadda Bunyasaranai

Abstract

This research investigates ideologies and linguistic strategies in the “sexually confused” consultation discourse in a virtual community by adopting Critical Discourse Analysis approach. The data were 324 texts from the bulletin board at www.pantip.com. The results reveal that the “sexually confused” consultation discourse conveys the three sets of ideologies: the ideology of natural sex, the ideology of gender essentialism, and the ideology of gender neutrality. Linguistic strategies that impart these ideologies include lexical choice, transitivity, metaphor, presupposition, and implicature. The ideologies construct and define the meanings of sex, gender, and sexuality in Thai society. The results also insist that the group of individuals in Thai society did not unanimously believe and follow a particular ideology. Consequently, such a lack of ideological coherence allows the participants in this virtual community to consider the condition of being “sexually confused” in varying perceptions. Finally, this research proposes that there is no such a thing as a “sexually confused” condition. Yet, the construction of the “sexually confused” discourse originates from the intrusion of the “natural sex” and “gender essentialism” ideologies. Thus, we contend that “sexually confused” as a descriptive term should be debunked for the reason that the set of ideas is constructed to alienate an individual from oneself and to impede the full acceptance of gender diversity and equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Techa, P., & Bunyasaranai, P. (2020). Language and Ideology in the “Sexually Confused” Consultation Discourse in a Virtual Community. Journal of Human Sciences, 21(3), 85-105. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JHUMANS/article/view/242164
Section
Research Articles

References

Chairerk, W. (2015). Phasa lae udomkan khwampenchai thi prakot nai nittayasan chi-em: kansuksa wathakam wikhro chœng wiphak [Language and masculine ideology in GM magazine: a critical discourse analysis]. (Doctoral’s thesis, Naresuan university).
Chonwilai, S. (2013). rak song phet khong phuying thang luak khong khwampratthana lae kan khonha niyam attalak [Love of bisexual women: choice, desire, and sexual identity]. In N. Duangwiset, P. A. Jackson (eds.), phet lak chet si: phahu watthanatham thang phet nai sangkhom Thai [Cultural Pluralism and Sex/Gender Diversity in Thailand] (pp. 176-216). Bangkok: Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre.
Duangwiset, N. (2013). phet laklai nai sangkhom Thai kap kanmuang khong 7attalak [Sex/Gender Pluralism in Thailand and the Politics of Identity]. Journal of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences Chiang Mai University, 25(2). 137-168.
____________. (2015) thopthuan withikan sang khwamru khwamching ruang phet [Review: construction of knowledge about sex, gender, and sexuality]. Retrieved from https://www.sac.or.th/databases/anthropology-concepts/articles/2
____________. (2017). chai num pen watthu thang phet lae kan prap khabuan phet withi nai lakhon chai rak chai [Male sexual objectification and adjustment of the sexual orientation in male homosexual dramas]. In N. Duangwiset (eds.), mua rang klai pen phet: amnat seriniyom mai khong phet withi nai sangkhom Thai [The Sexualized body: neoliberal power, new media trends and transnational East Asian influences on sexuality in Thailand] (pp. 188-233). Bangkok: Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre (Public Organization).
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
___________. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
Kang, M., Lessard, D., Heston, L., & Nordmaken, S. (2017). Introduction to Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies. MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.
Kavilanan, K. (2018). konlawithi thang phasa phua prakop sang khwamrak khongke nai botphleng prakop lakhon sirike: kansưksa tam naeo wathakam wikhro choeng wiphak [Linguistic Strategies for Gay’s Love Construction in Thai Gay Series Songs: A Critical Discourse Analysis Study]. Mekong salvin civilization journal, 9(2). 95-114.
Klinsuwan, K. (2013). khwamtaektang rawang chai-ying nai kanhaikhamnaenam panha chiwit rak nai hong Sala prachakhom wepsai phanthip dot khom: kansuksa wathakam wikhro chœng wiphak [Difference between men and women in relationship advisory discourse on salaprachakhom web board on www.pantip.com: a critical discourse analysis] (Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University).
Phanichtrakul, K. (2013). khwamsamphan rawang phasa kap udomkan waduai chai rak chai nai nangsu phim rai wan phasa Thai pi phoso 2555 [The relationship between language and ideology of male homosexuality in Thai daily newspaper in 2012: a critical discourse analysis] (Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University).
Mahittivanicha, N. (2019). khomun phuchai ngan su dichiton khong prathet Thai Makarakhom songphansipkao [Thailand digital usage 2019]. Retrieved from https://www.twfdigital.com/blog/2019/02/thailand-digital-usage-stats-2019
Mey, J. L. (2009). Concise encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Nippanon, P. (2016). kansang phap tuathaen thom khong nittayasan @ tom actz rawang Pho So 2550-2559 [The construction of female trasgender “tom” stereotype in @tom actz magazine during
2007-2016] (Master’s thesis, Thammasat University).
Odrowaz Coates, A. (2015). Is gender neutrality a post-human phenomenon? The concept of gender neutral in Swedish education. Journal of Gender and Power, 3(1). 113-133.
Pakdeepasuk, P. (2010). wathakam khwampen phuying nai nittayasan sukkhaphap lae khwam ngam phasa Thai [Discourse of Femininity in Advertisements in Thai Health and Beauty Magazines]. Bangkok: Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Panpothong, N. (2013). wathakam wikhro chœng wiphak tam naeo phasasat: naeokhit lae kannam masuksa watthakam nai phasa Thai [Critical Discourse Analysis: concept and usage in Thai discourse]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Parker, R. D. (2014). How to Interpret Literature: Critical Theory for Literary and Cultural Studies (3 ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
The National Discovery Museum Institute. (2019). phet haeng Sayam prawattisat hwamlaklai thang phet [Gender of Siam: history of sexual diversity]. Bangkok: The National Discovery Museum Institute.
UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia. (2017). gender equality: glossary term and concept. Leknath Marg: Kathmandu.
Wattanachaisriskul, N. & Lerlertyuttitham, P. (2017). phap thaen kanyomrap kan rak phet diaokan khong wairun chak raikan khlap fraide [Representation “Acceptance of Homosexual” ofteenager in Thai Societyfrom Club Friday Radio Program]. Liberal arts review, 12(23),75-83.
Wongchusap, S. (2019). Unisex mua faechan songsœm khwam thaothiam thang phet Unisex [Unisex fashion trends encourage gender equality]. Retrieved from http://www.thaifranchisecenter.com/document/show.php?docuID=5272
Wongthai, N. (2019). atthasatparichanbuangton [cognitive semantic]. Bangkok: world of print.