Phonological Variation of Intervocalic /t/ among Thai learners

Main Article Content

Suthinee Promkandorn

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating an English phonological variable of /t/ which can be realized as an aspirated t [tʰ] and a flap t [ɾ] across three speech styles, including Interview, Reading Passage, and Wordlist. Forty English major students from four universities in Chiang Mai participated in the study by using a purposive random sampling method. Different realizations of /t/ from the three tasks were judged by a native English speaker and categorized under the feature of RP (Received Pronunciation) or GA (General American), which can lead to a discussion of which accent is preferable among Thai learners. The analysis confirmed once again by the researcher for credibility. Sounds that were still in ambiguity was further analyzed by using a speech analyzer program called “PRAAT” to view their spectral content.  The results indicate that the realization of intervocalic /t/ as [tʰ] which belongs to the Received Pronunciation is widely practiced among students in different institutes. It is, therefore, regarded as a prestigious feature that the students would like to adopt. The preference towards the [tʰ] sound is also supported by the considerably higher percentage of [tʰ] in the wordlist, which is the most formal style, than in other instruments. The Chi-square test also confirmed that the pronunciation awareness of /t/ is significantly correlated with the speech styles (χ2 = 17.11, df = 2,  p<.01).

Article Details

How to Cite
Promkandorn, S. (2020). Phonological Variation of Intervocalic /t/ among Thai learners. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities, 21(1), 96–115. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JHUMANS/article/view/222237
Section
Research Articles

References

Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J., & Jones, M. (2010). Analysing stops. In Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge

Jenkins, J. (2002). A Sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an International Language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1). 83–103.

Kanokpermpoon, M. (2007). Thai and English consonantal sounds: A problem or a potential for EFL learning?. ABAC Journal, 27(1). 57–66.

Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4). 654–655.

Labov, W. (2006). The Social Stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mooney, A., & Evans, B. (2015). Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Romaine, S. (1984). The Language of Children and Adolecents. Oxford: Blackwell.

Thieberger, N. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Trudgill, P., & Hannah, J. (1994). International English: A Guide to Varieties of Standard English. London: E. Arnold.

Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Yaeger-Dror, M. (2001). Primitives of a system for style and register. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation (pp. 170–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.