Born Into Hospitality – Are Second-Generation Refugees Temporary Guests or Residents "at Home"?

Main Article Content

Miriam Jaehn

Abstract

While the focus on the Rohingya refugees in Thailand tends to be on those who fled from Arakan/Rakhine State due to their violent persecution by the military regime, this paper focuses on the second generation of Rohingya born and/or growing up in Thailand. Based on an ethnographic inquiry, I argue that despite the state’s hospitality towards refugees, migrants, and stateless people, second-generation Rohingya create routes of home in Thailand. Focusing on the life story of Shafak, I show that second-generation Rohingya's sense of home is forged through floating intimate ties that allow them to secure their lives in Thailand and remake their homes elsewhere if needed. Though constructed as a ‘national security threat’ and perceived as unwelcome guests by the government, second-generation Rohingya act as residents and become residents at the margins of the nation-state where its sovereignty over territory and people remains challenged. I will demonstrate this specifically in Thailand's so-called deep South. In the end, I claim that second-generation Rohingya's routes of home along the thresholds of the nation-state beg the question of whether they can still legitimately be viewed only as 'temporary guests.’

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaehn, M. (2024). Born Into Hospitality – Are Second-Generation Refugees Temporary Guests or Residents "at Home"?. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 10(2). retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HRPS/article/view/279411
Section
Research Articles

References

Abhornsuwan, Thanet. 2007. “Rebellion in Southern Thailand: Contending Histories.” Policy Studies 35. Washington, DC: East-West Center.

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Habitus. In Habitus: A Sense of Place, (eds.) Jean Hillier & Emma Rooksby, Ashgate, 27-34.

Chachavalpongpun, P. (2023). Peace and Conflict Studies in Thailand: The Primacy of the State's Narrative of Security. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 11(1), 95-117. Doi: 10.18588/202305.00a336

Chantavanich, S. (2020). Thailand’s Challenges in Implementing Anti-Trafficking Legislation: The Case of the Rohingya. Journal of Human Trafficking, 6(2), 234-243. Doi:

1080/23322705.2020.1691825

Coddington, K. (2023). The everyday erosion of refugee claims: Representations of the Rohingya in Thailand. Social & Cultural Geography, 24(2), 274–291. Doi: 10.1080/14649365.2021.1939125

— (2020). Producing Thailand as a transit country: borders, advocacy, and destitution. Mobilities, 15(4), 588-603. Doi: 10.1080/17450101.2020.1759928

Derrida, J. (2000). Hostipitality. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 5(3), 3-18. Doi: 10.1080/09697250020034706

Easthope, H. (2004). A Place Called Home. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(3), 128–138. Doi: 10.1080/14036090410021360

Engvall, Anders, Jitpiromsri, Srisombob, Potchapornkul, Emma, & Ropers, Norbert (eds.). (2020). Southern Thailand/Patani. Understanding dimensions of conflict and peace. Peace Resource Collaborative.

Engvall, Anders. (2020). Violence in southern Thailand’s border provinces: Status, trends, and patterns 2004-2018. In Southern Thailand/Patani. Understanding dimensions of conflict and peace, (eds.) Anders Engvall, Srisombob Jitpiromsri, Emma Potchapornkul, & Norbert Ropers, Peace Resource Collaborative, 56-86.

Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic. Modernity and Double Consciousness. Harvard University Press.

Jaehn, M. (2022). From Refugees to Legitimate Minority? Rohingya PerformingNational Belongings in Thailand. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 37(3), 465-489. Doi: 10.1355/sj37-3c

Jittiang, B. (2023). In the name of national security: Thailand and the securitisation of the Rohingya. In: Marginalisation and Human Rights in Southeast Asia, (eds.) Al Khanif and Khoo Ying Hooi, Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series, 151-166.

— (2022). Policy Entrepreneurship and the Drafting of Refugee Law in a Non-Signatory Country: The Case of Thailand’s National Screening Mechanism. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(4), 1492-1507. Doi: 10.1093/jrs/feac032

Kellett, P., & Moore, J. (2003). Routes to home: homelessness and home-making in contrasting societies. Habitat International, 27, 123-141.

Laungaramsri, P. (2020). Governing by paper: mediating textual border and negotiating mobility in Thailand. South East Asia Research, 28(3), 267-283. Doi: 10.1080/0967828X.2020.1813622

Malyrojsiri, Pindarica. Language and Language-in-education as key features of the conflict and its transformation. In Southern Thailand/Patani. Understanding dimensions of conflict and peace, (eds.) Anders Engvall, Srisombob Jitpiromsri, Emma Potchapornkul, & Norbert Ropers, Peace Resource Collaborative, 232-272.

Massey, D. (1992). A place called home. New formations, 17(3), 3-15.

McCargo, Duncan. 2012. Mapping National Anxieties: Thailand’s Southern Conflict. NIAS Press.

— (2009). Tearing apart the land. Islam and legitimacy in Southern Thailand. NUS Press.

Missbach, A., & Philips, M. (2020). Introduction: Reconceptualizing Transit States in an Era of Outsourcing, Off shoring, and Obfuscation. In Migration and Society: Advances in Research 3, 19–33. Doi: 10.3167/arms.2020.111402

Moretti, S. (2015). The challenge of durable solutions for refugees at the Thai–Myanmar border. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 34(3), 70-94. Doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdv008

Thabchumpon, Naruemon, Bea Moraras, Bea, Laocharoenwong, Jiraporn, & Karom, Wannaprapa. (2014). “Social Welfare and Security”. In Temporary Shelters and Surrounding Communities: Livelihood Opportunities, the Labour Market, Social Welfare and Social Security, (eds) Yongyuth Chalamwong, Naruemon Thabchumpon, and Supang Chantavanich, Springer, pp. 57-167.

Nelson, A. (2020). From Romance to Tragedy: House Ownership and Relocation in the Resettlement Narratives of Nepali Bhutanese Refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(4), 4053-4071. Doi:10.1093/jrs/feaa079

Nillsuwan, B. (2023). Interacting with global refugee complexity and wresting control: Shan refugees and migrants in Thailand. Asian Politics & Policy, 15(2), 226-248. Doi: 10.1111/aspp.12694

Oh, Su-Ann. (2014). “Burmese Refugees in Thailand: Should They Stay Or Should They Go?”. ISEAS Perspective 18, pp. 1–9.

— (2013). Rohingya Boat Arrivals in Thailand: From the Frying Pan into the Fire?. ISEAS Perspective 11, pp. 1–6

Open letter: Human rights concerns regarding the draft notification of the protected person screening committee. Fortify Rights. December 15, 2022.

Saltsman, A. (2014). Beyond the law: Power, discretion, and bureaucracy in the management of asylum space in Thailand. Journal of Refugee Studies, 27(3), 457-476. Doi: 10.1093/jrs/feu004

Shryock, A. (2012). Breaking hospitality apart: bad hosts, bad guests, and the problem of sovereignty. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, (N.S), 20-33. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01758.x

Simonsen, K. (2012). In quest of a new humanism: Embodiment, experience and phenomenology as critical geography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 10-26. Doi: 10.1177/0309132512467573

Sirriyeh, A. (2010). Home journeys: Im/mobilities in young refugee and asylum-seeking women’s negotiations of home. Childhood, 17(2), 213-227. Doi: 10.1177/0907568210365667

Sold Like Fish, Crimes Against Humanity, Mass Graves, and Human Trafficking from Myanmar and Bangladesh to Malaysia from 2012 to 2015. SUHAKAM & Fortify Rights, 2019.

Stothard, D. (2023, September 12). 34th #WhatsHappeninginMyanmar. SEA-Junction. [Online Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc9HtJcXsQk

Taylor, H. Refugees, the state and the concept of home. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 32(2), 130–152. Doi:10.1093/rsq/hdt004

Wilding, R. (2017). Families, Intimacy and Globalization: Floating Ties. London: Bloomsbury Publishing